Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BACKPORT][CT-2888] Backport #8247 to 1.6.latest #8251

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023
Merged

[BACKPORT][CT-2888] Backport #8247 to 1.6.latest #8251

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 28, 2023

Conversation

QMalcolm
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #8247

Description

Backporting #8250 to 1.6.latest

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
  • I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
  • This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
  • This PR has no interface changes (e.g. macros, cli, logs, json artifacts, config files, adapter interface, etc) or this PR has already received feedback and approval from Product or DX

@QMalcolm QMalcolm added dependencies Changes to the version of dbt dependencies semantic Issues related to the semantic layer labels Jul 28, 2023
@QMalcolm QMalcolm requested review from a team as code owners July 28, 2023 20:59
@QMalcolm QMalcolm requested review from emmyoop and VersusFacit and removed request for a team July 28, 2023 20:59
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla:yes label Jul 28, 2023
@QMalcolm QMalcolm force-pushed the ct-2888--backport-to-1.6.latest branch from b0d2459 to 95a0ea2 Compare July 28, 2023 21:15
@QMalcolm QMalcolm requested a review from martynydbt July 28, 2023 21:28
@emmyoop emmyoop merged commit 02e08c7 into 1.6.latest Jul 28, 2023
29 checks passed
@emmyoop emmyoop deleted the ct-2888--backport-to-1.6.latest branch July 28, 2023 22:19
@aranke aranke mentioned this pull request Jul 12, 2024
Draft
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@martynydbt martynydbt martynydbt approved these changes

@emmyoop emmyoop emmyoop approved these changes

@VersusFacit VersusFacit Awaiting requested review from VersusFacit VersusFacit is a code owner automatically assigned from dbt-labs/guild-oss-tooling

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cla:yes dependencies Changes to the version of dbt dependencies semantic Issues related to the semantic layer
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@QMalcolm @emmyoop @martynydbt