Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Clean up docs build scripts/type error in discord.ts package #65

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 1, 2025

Conversation

harriq
Copy link
Collaborator

@harriq harriq commented Jan 29, 2025

Cleans up the build scripts for the docs directory, and removes the hardcoded readme file. Also fixes an issue due to channel types in the discord.ts file in the packages directory that was causing the build scripts to fail.

Note: not certain on how the CI/CD pipeline is in this project, so I just build the project locally and included those commit hash reference updates in this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation Updates

    • Removed all content related to the "Daydreams" generative agent library from the README files.
    • Updated documentation links across multiple namespaces to reflect new commit hashes.
    • Simplified documentation generation scripts for consistency and efficiency.
    • Added new ResearchQuantProcessor class documentation with enhanced definitions.
  • Code Changes

    • Enhanced channel validation logic in the Discord client.
    • Introduced a new method for validating text channels in the Discord integration.

The changes primarily focus on documentation refinement and improvements in channel validation.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
daydreams ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 1, 2025 11:28pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ponderingdemocritus has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d181279 and 569d70a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md (0 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts (3 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request involves significant documentation changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on removing content related to the Daydreams library and updating documentation links. The changes include removing the README content, updating source code links in various documentation files, adding a new ResearchQuantProcessor, and modifying documentation scripts. The modifications suggest a strategic shift in the project's documentation and potentially its overall direction.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md Completely removed Daydreams library content, replaced with single line # portfolio
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Chains.md Updated source code links for EvmChain, SolanaChain, and StarknetChain classes
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/IO/namespaces/Twitter.md Updated documentation links for TwitterClient
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md Added new ResearchQuantProcessor class with methods and properties
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Providers.md Updated link for fetchGraphQL function
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Utils.md Updated function definition links in Utils namespace
docs/package.json Modified documentation scripts to simplify commands
packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts Added getIsValidTextChannel method to DiscordClient
readme.md Completely removed all existing content

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Docs as Documentation
    participant Processor as ResearchQuantProcessor
    participant LLMClient as LLM Client
    
    Docs->>Processor: Initialize with parameters
    Processor->>LLMClient: Configure client
    Processor-->>Docs: Ready for processing
    
    Docs->>Processor: Call canHandle()
    Processor-->>Docs: Validate content type
    
    Docs->>Processor: Call process()
    Processor->>LLMClient: Process content
    LLMClient-->>Processor: Return processed result
    Processor-->>Docs: Return processed data
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • refactor COT and cleanups #21: This PR involves a refactor of the Chain of Thought (CoT) and cleanups, which may relate to the changes in the main PR that removed the "Daydreams" library content, as both involve significant alterations to the documentation and structure of the project.
  • feat: llm clients #30: This PR focuses on adding support for LLM clients, which could be relevant as the main PR's changes to the documentation may affect how these clients are referenced or utilized in the context of the Daydreams library.
  • feat: processor refactor #45: This PR refactors the processor component, which is directly related to the changes in the main PR that removed documentation about the Daydreams library, as it may impact how processors are documented and utilized.

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, documentation dance!
Old Daydreams fade, a new advance
Processors bloom, links realign
Code's poetry, a fresh design
Rabbit's leap into the unknown! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 04:32
@ponderingdemocritus
Copy link
Contributor

nice! could you fix thie conflict

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md (1)

404-404: Consider using a more specific return type.

The process method's return type is currently documented as Promise<any>. Consider using a more specific type, such as Promise<ProcessedResult> like in the MessageProcessor, to provide better type safety and documentation.

Also applies to: 442-442

docs/package.json (1)

9-11: Consider enhancing the documentation pipeline.

The current setup could benefit from:

  1. A clear separation between API documentation and general documentation scripts
  2. A validation step to ensure documentation completeness
  3. A preview script that builds and serves the documentation locally

Consider this enhanced script structure:

 {
   "scripts": {
-    "docs:api": "typedoc",
-    "docs:dev": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm dev",
-    "docs:build": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm build"
+    "docs:api": "typedoc",
+    "docs:content": "vocs build",
+    "docs:validate": "node scripts/validate-docs.js",
+    "docs:dev": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm dev",
+    "docs:preview": "pnpm docs:build && pnpm preview",
+    "docs:build": "pnpm docs:validate && pnpm docs:api && pnpm docs:content"
   }
 }

Would you like me to help create the validation script?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa77f77 and 23fa5d6.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/_media/banner.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Chains.md (15 hunks)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/IO/namespaces/Twitter.md (5 hunks)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md (10 hunks)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Providers.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Utils.md (9 hunks)
  • docs/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts (3 hunks)
  • readme.md (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • readme.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Providers.md
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/IO/namespaces/Twitter.md
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Chains.md
  • docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Utils.md
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts (3)

1-10: LGTM! Improved type safety with discord.js imports.

The addition of ChannelType, TextChannel, and Channel type imports enhances type safety for channel-related operations.


111-113: LGTM! Well-implemented type guard.

The getIsValidTextChannel method is a well-crafted type guard that:

  • Uses TypeScript's type predicate for proper type narrowing
  • Centralizes channel type validation logic
  • Makes the code more maintainable

133-133: LGTM! Improved channel type validation.

The change from isTextBased() to getIsValidTextChannel() provides more precise channel type validation, fixing the type error mentioned in the PR objectives.

docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md (3)

7-7: LGTM! Documentation links and clarity improvements.

The updates maintain documentation accuracy with:

  • Updated source code links to the correct commit hash
  • Improved clarity about the processor's purpose for handling shorter messages

Also applies to: 22-22, 74-74, 86-86, 98-98, 110-110, 132-132, 134-135, 155-155, 173-173


60-69: LGTM! Well-documented property.

The contentLimit property documentation is complete with:

  • Clear property definition
  • Proper inheritance information

219-230: LGTM! Comprehensive class documentation.

The ResearchQuantProcessor documentation is well-structured with:

  • Clear purpose definition
  • Detailed list of responsibilities
  • Good context for implementation and usage
docs/package.json (2)

10-11: Verify that the referenced npm scripts exist.

The commands now use pnpm dev and pnpm build instead of direct vocs commands. These should map to the scripts defined above them.

Let's verify the script definitions:

✅ Verification successful

Scripts are properly defined and chained correctly

The dev and build scripts exist in the package.json and correctly map to vocs commands, making the docs:dev and docs:build scripts valid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract and verify the script definitions
echo "Verifying script definitions..."
jq -r '.scripts | to_entries | .[] | select(.key | test("^(dev|build)$"))' docs/package.json

Length of output: 255


9-9: Verify the impact of removing README.md copy operation.

The removal of the README.md copy operation aligns with the PR objective to clean up build scripts. However, we should verify that this doesn't leave a gap in the documentation.

Let's check if there's alternative content for the documentation homepage:

✅ Verification successful

Removal of README.md copy operation is safe

The documentation has a dedicated, comprehensive index.mdx that serves as the homepage, containing complete project documentation including features, installation instructions, and examples. No content gaps are introduced by removing the README.md copy operation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's an alternative index page
echo "Checking for alternative index page..."
fd -t f "index.mdx?" docs/pages/

# Check the typedoc output location
echo "Checking typedoc output..."
fd -t f "index.*" -E "*.ts" -E "*.js" docs/

Length of output: 355


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of index.mdx
echo "Content of index.mdx:"
cat docs/docs/pages/index.mdx

# Look for vocs configuration
echo -e "\nChecking for vocs config:"
fd -t f "vocs.config.ts" docs/

Length of output: 8160

# Conflicts:
#	packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts
@harriq
Copy link
Collaborator Author

harriq commented Jan 29, 2025

@ponderingdemocritus done ✅

@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus merged commit bccc71c into main Feb 1, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@ponderingdemocritus ponderingdemocritus deleted the hq/fix-docs-v2 branch February 1, 2025 23:28
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants