-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Clean up docs build scripts/type error in discord.ts
package
#65
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ponderingdemocritus has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 20 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request involves significant documentation changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on removing content related to the Daydreams library and updating documentation links. The changes include removing the README content, updating source code links in various documentation files, adding a new Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Docs as Documentation
participant Processor as ResearchQuantProcessor
participant LLMClient as LLM Client
Docs->>Processor: Initialize with parameters
Processor->>LLMClient: Configure client
Processor-->>Docs: Ready for processing
Docs->>Processor: Call canHandle()
Processor-->>Docs: Validate content type
Docs->>Processor: Call process()
Processor->>LLMClient: Process content
LLMClient-->>Processor: Return processed result
Processor-->>Docs: Return processed data
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
nice! could you fix thie conflict |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md (1)
404-404
: Consider using a more specific return type.The
process
method's return type is currently documented asPromise<any>
. Consider using a more specific type, such asPromise<ProcessedResult>
like in the MessageProcessor, to provide better type safety and documentation.Also applies to: 442-442
docs/package.json (1)
9-11
: Consider enhancing the documentation pipeline.The current setup could benefit from:
- A clear separation between API documentation and general documentation scripts
- A validation step to ensure documentation completeness
- A preview script that builds and serves the documentation locally
Consider this enhanced script structure:
{ "scripts": { - "docs:api": "typedoc", - "docs:dev": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm dev", - "docs:build": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm build" + "docs:api": "typedoc", + "docs:content": "vocs build", + "docs:validate": "node scripts/validate-docs.js", + "docs:dev": "pnpm docs:api && pnpm dev", + "docs:preview": "pnpm docs:build && pnpm preview", + "docs:build": "pnpm docs:validate && pnpm docs:api && pnpm docs:content" } }Would you like me to help create the validation script?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/_media/banner.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md
(1 hunks)docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Chains.md
(15 hunks)docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/IO/namespaces/Twitter.md
(5 hunks)docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md
(10 hunks)docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Providers.md
(1 hunks)docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Utils.md
(9 hunks)docs/package.json
(1 hunks)packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts
(3 hunks)readme.md
(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- readme.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Providers.md
- docs/docs/pages/api-reference/README.md
- docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/IO/namespaces/Twitter.md
- docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Chains.md
- docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Utils.md
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts (3)
1-10
: LGTM! Improved type safety with discord.js imports.The addition of
ChannelType
,TextChannel
, andChannel
type imports enhances type safety for channel-related operations.
111-113
: LGTM! Well-implemented type guard.The
getIsValidTextChannel
method is a well-crafted type guard that:
- Uses TypeScript's type predicate for proper type narrowing
- Centralizes channel type validation logic
- Makes the code more maintainable
133-133
: LGTM! Improved channel type validation.The change from
isTextBased()
togetIsValidTextChannel()
provides more precise channel type validation, fixing the type error mentioned in the PR objectives.docs/docs/pages/api-reference/namespaces/Processors.md (3)
7-7
: LGTM! Documentation links and clarity improvements.The updates maintain documentation accuracy with:
- Updated source code links to the correct commit hash
- Improved clarity about the processor's purpose for handling shorter messages
Also applies to: 22-22, 74-74, 86-86, 98-98, 110-110, 132-132, 134-135, 155-155, 173-173
60-69
: LGTM! Well-documented property.The
contentLimit
property documentation is complete with:
- Clear property definition
- Proper inheritance information
219-230
: LGTM! Comprehensive class documentation.The ResearchQuantProcessor documentation is well-structured with:
- Clear purpose definition
- Detailed list of responsibilities
- Good context for implementation and usage
docs/package.json (2)
10-11
: Verify that the referenced npm scripts exist.The commands now use
pnpm dev
andpnpm build
instead of directvocs
commands. These should map to the scripts defined above them.Let's verify the script definitions:
✅ Verification successful
Scripts are properly defined and chained correctly
The
dev
andbuild
scripts exist in the package.json and correctly map tovocs
commands, making thedocs:dev
anddocs:build
scripts valid.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract and verify the script definitions echo "Verifying script definitions..." jq -r '.scripts | to_entries | .[] | select(.key | test("^(dev|build)$"))' docs/package.jsonLength of output: 255
9-9
: Verify the impact of removing README.md copy operation.The removal of the README.md copy operation aligns with the PR objective to clean up build scripts. However, we should verify that this doesn't leave a gap in the documentation.
Let's check if there's alternative content for the documentation homepage:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of README.md copy operation is safe ✅
The documentation has a dedicated, comprehensive
index.mdx
that serves as the homepage, containing complete project documentation including features, installation instructions, and examples. No content gaps are introduced by removing the README.md copy operation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's an alternative index page echo "Checking for alternative index page..." fd -t f "index.mdx?" docs/pages/ # Check the typedoc output location echo "Checking typedoc output..." fd -t f "index.*" -E "*.ts" -E "*.js" docs/Length of output: 355
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check content of index.mdx echo "Content of index.mdx:" cat docs/docs/pages/index.mdx # Look for vocs configuration echo -e "\nChecking for vocs config:" fd -t f "vocs.config.ts" docs/Length of output: 8160
# Conflicts: # packages/core/src/core/io/discord.ts
@ponderingdemocritus done ✅ |
Cleans up the build scripts for the
docs
directory, and removes the hardcodedreadme
file. Also fixes an issue due to channel types in thediscord.ts
file in the packages directory that was causing the build scripts to fail.Note: not certain on how the CI/CD pipeline is in this project, so I just build the project locally and included those commit hash reference updates in this PR.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation Updates
ResearchQuantProcessor
class documentation with enhanced definitions.Code Changes
The changes primarily focus on documentation refinement and improvements in channel validation.