Removed full context from validateGoalSuccess

[0xtechnoir]

Committer: technoir [email protected]

Resolves #16

Working on this PR revealed broader issues relating to how the context is used but will open a separate issue for that. This PR specifically addresses the use of the context in validateGoalSuccess.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Improvements
  • Refined goal validation process to focus more precisely on goal description and success criteria
  • Enhanced validation prompt to improve accuracy of goal assessment

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the validateGoalSuccess method in the ChainOfThought class, specifically refining the validation prompt for goal achievement. The changes focus on streamlining the context passed to the validation process, reducing unnecessary token usage by removing the current context from the validation prompt. The method now emphasizes the goal description and success criteria, maintaining the same return structure for goal validation.

Changes

File	Change Summary
packages/core/src/core/chain-of-thought.ts	Updated validateGoalSuccess method prompt to focus on goal description and success criteria, removing current context from validation

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Optimize context passed to validateGoalSuccess [#16]	✅

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so bright,
Trimming contexts with all my might,
Tokens reduced, validation keen,
Goals now clearer, purpose seen!
Hop hop hooray for lean machine! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

packages/core/src/core/chain-of-thought.ts (1)

498-498: LGTM! The context removal improves token efficiency.

The removal of full context from the validation prompt is a good optimization. The current implementation correctly focuses on essential information:

• Goal description and success criteria for validation requirements
• Recent steps (last 10) for progress assessment

Consider these potential future improvements:

1. Make the number of recent steps configurable
2. Add validation metrics to track token usage improvements

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14f6369 and 3fa9404.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• packages/core/src/core/chain-of-thought.ts (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

packages/core/src/core/chain-of-thought.ts (1)

498-498: Verify that context removal doesn't impact validation accuracy.

While removing context optimizes token usage, let's verify that all necessary information for goal validation is still available.

Run this script to analyze the usage of context in goal validation across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Context removal does not impact validation accuracy

The goal validation system is well-designed to operate independently using only the goal description, explicit success criteria, and recent steps. The broader context is not used in the validation logic.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any direct dependencies on full context in goal validation

# Search for patterns that might expect full context in validation
rg -A 5 "validateGoalSuccess.*context" 

# Search for potential validation failures due to missing context
rg -A 5 "Goal validation failed.*context"

Length of output: 84

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find goal validation implementation and related logic
ast-grep --pattern 'function validateGoalSuccess($_) {
  $$$
}'

# Search for goal validation related patterns
rg -B 5 -A 10 "goal.*success.*criteria" --type ts

Length of output: 3886