improved working on swd exercise

[pow123]

Learners were confused by the exercise as they thought activities 2, 3, and 4 were using interviews_100. So, I recommend adding clarifying language.

[github-actions]

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

• 🎯 correct output
• 🖼️ correct figures
• ❓ new warnings
• ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/datacarpentry/r-socialsci/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-474

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 02-starting-with-data.md            |   2 +
 data-visualisation-handout.md (new) | 293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 data-wrangling-handout.md (new)     | 284 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 intro-R-handout.md (new)            | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 md5sum.txt                          |   6 +-
 starting-with-data-handout.md (new) | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 1036 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2023-07-25 18:42:12 +0000

[juanfung]

@pow123 great catch thank you!