Fixing all protobuf java to be 3.25.5 #1182
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: salaboy <[email protected]>
salaboy
force-pushed
the
1178-grpc-proto-vul
branch
from
135d791 to
988aab7
Compare
|
🎅 |
|
/retest |
artursouza
approved these changes
Dec 26, 2024
artursouza
pushed a commit
to artursouza/java-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2025
Signed-off-by: salaboy <[email protected]>
cicoyle
added a commit
to cicoyle/java-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]>
artursouza
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2025
artursouza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
) * up versions to be secure and fix issues due to deprecation Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * see if this fixes it Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * check if protoc is in ci Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * see if changes from this PR (#1182) fix it Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * 3.25.5 version protobuf-java Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * rm explicit versions and fix deprecation dependency to new one Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * merge in release branch and lower protoc versions to match Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * force upped version Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * use protobuf.version 3.25.5 (secure) Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * use correct protobuf for sdk tests Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]>
cicoyle
added a commit
to cicoyle/java-sdk
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…pr#1187) * up versions to be secure and fix issues due to deprecation Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * see if this fixes it Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * check if protoc is in ci Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * see if changes from this PR (dapr#1182) fix it Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * 3.25.5 version protobuf-java Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * rm explicit versions and fix deprecation dependency to new one Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * merge in release branch and lower protoc versions to match Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * force upped version Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * use protobuf.version 3.25.5 (secure) Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> * use correct protobuf for sdk tests Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Cassandra Coyle <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Updating grpc to 1.69.0 to match protobuf-java to 3.25.5
Issue reference
We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.
Please reference the issue this PR will close: #1178
Checklist
Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list: