Skip to content

Create fit-together.json #530

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create fit-together.json #530

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 34 additions & 0 deletions daos/mainnet/fit-together.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
{
"name": "FitTogether",
"Avatar": "0x006087d6ac20840c23ba298512DB454a05C19b10",
"DAOToken": "0xA3820E0f6be1C306C0a76746AF80b60c228d99C2",
"Reputation": "0x63853faCE2FA44c4E7a8b4Cf2371416c5aF8e68b",
"Controller": "0x0A23f3Ca789Fe18a08F774de7262aDF13d5b48C6",
"Schemes": [
{
"name": "ContributionRewardExt",
"alias": "ContributionRewardExt",
"address": "0xD598aAd8700bA3c588c3A2d3A43de6C5D69De23b",
"arcVersion": "0.0.1-rc.41"
},
{
"name": "ReputationAdmin",
"alias": "ReputationAdmin",
"address": "0x550F422C14780f64685A0959da12b528531847BA",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the owner of this is 0x06044b5359d8df7886366c22c61c7ecd29becac7 .
who is it ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ben-kaufman ben-kaufman Apr 27, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know, @Theylon should know that.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's the dHack metamask address

"arcVersion": "0.0.1-rc.41"
}
],
"StandAloneContracts": [
{
"name": "ContributionRewardExt",
"address": "0xD598aAd8700bA3c588c3A2d3A43de6C5D69De23b",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why there are 2 ContributionRewardExt?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is only one (note the address is the same for both).
That's "duplicated" because of how the migration deals with the Contribution Reward + Competition interdependency.
It's like that in all daos, see for example https://github.com/daostack/subgraph/blob/master/daos/mainnet/cryptochicks.json

"arcVersion": "0.0.1-rc.41"
},
{
"name": "Competition",
"address": "0xB3d24c0e4411819338BF5efe9702C916B2709a04",
"arcVersion": "0.0.1-rc.41"
}
],
"arcVersion": "0.0.1-rc.41"
}