Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-17109 cart: clients URI lookup of rank0 can lead to crash #15891

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frostedcmos
Copy link
Contributor

  • Cart group was incorrectly leaving gp_psr_rank field to 0, causing issues when rank=0 was being looked up.

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

- Cart group was incorrectly leaving gp_psr_rank field to 0, causing
issues when rank=0 was being looked up.

Signed-off-by: Alexander A Oganezov <[email protected]>
Copy link

Ticket title is 'self_test issues with tcp provider'
Status is 'Open'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-17109

Copy link
Contributor

@knard38 knard38 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested and validated on wolf cluster.

@frostedcmos frostedcmos marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 15:53
@frostedcmos frostedcmos requested review from a team as code owners February 12, 2025 15:53
@@ -1090,6 +1091,8 @@ crt_grp_priv_create(struct crt_grp_priv **grp_priv_created,

grp_priv->gp_size = 0;
grp_priv->gp_refcount = 1;
grp_priv->gp_psr_rank = CRT_NO_RANK;

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how does setting it to no rank fix the issue ? the title says look up of rank 0, is rank 0 set to CRT_NO_RANK ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

during URI_LOOKUP handling there is a following logic block:
if (base_addr == NULL && !crt_is_service()) { D_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(&grp_priv->gp_rwlock); if (tgt_ep->ep_rank == grp_priv->gp_psr_rank && dst_tag == 0) { D_STRNDUP(uri, grp_priv->gp_psr_uri, CRT_ADDR_STR_MAX_LEN); D_RWLOCK_UNLOCK(&grp_priv->gp_rwlock);

If rank being looked up (tgt_ep->ep_rank) matches a psr_rank then we can use psr's uri.
The problem is that we inialized before gp_psr_rank to 0, causing this block then to assume that psr rank has been set (to 0) and therefor gp_psr_uri is valid.

Setting gp_psr_rank to CRT_NO_RANK at init ensures 'gp_psr_rank' is treated properly in checks like above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants