Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement composite member lookup #32

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023
Merged

Implement composite member lookup #32

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

OJFord
Copy link
Contributor

@OJFord OJFord commented Mar 17, 2023

Closes #9

Also introduces support for a differing db_column, since I covered that in lookup test cases only to realise it actually didn't work at all 🙂.

@OJFord
Copy link
Contributor Author

OJFord commented Mar 17, 2023

I think this may also implement #10 (Django doing the rest) but I haven't tested it.

Copy link
Owner

@danni danni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is very straightforward. Nice work.

@danni
Copy link
Owner

danni commented Mar 20, 2023

Hmm, the linter has failed to run, but I don't think it's your fault. I think something has bitrotten in Poetry.

@danni danni merged commit e5a48c9 into danni:master Mar 20, 2023
@OJFord
Copy link
Contributor Author

OJFord commented Mar 20, 2023

Ah sorry, I didn't notice you were using pre-commit, didn't install it (its hooks for the repo).

@OJFord OJFord deleted the impl-9 branch March 20, 2023 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement lookups on values within composite types
2 participants