-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement simplified backend selection #428
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Note: I deliberately punted on trying to change |
tarcieri
force-pushed
the
simplified-backend-selection
branch
from
November 11, 2022 03:00
e7f46bf
to
c2b908d
Compare
tarcieri
force-pushed
the
simplified-backend-selection
branch
from
November 11, 2022 03:01
c2b908d
to
11bdd3e
Compare
tarcieri
commented
Nov 11, 2022
tarcieri
commented
Nov 11, 2022
tarcieri
force-pushed
the
simplified-backend-selection
branch
2 times, most recently
from
November 11, 2022 03:23
40bac3c
to
935f182
Compare
Merged
rozbb
requested changes
Nov 13, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good! And nice changes to the CI. Left some small comments here and there. After that, and a conflict resolution, this is good to go.
As proposed in #414, this commit changes the backend selection approach, introspecting `target_pointer_width` to select `u32_backend` vs `u64_backend` (or `fiat_u32_backend`/`fiat_u64_backend` if the `fiat_backend` feature is enabled). This helps eliminate the use of non-additive features, and also the rather confusing errors that happen if multiple backends are selected (i.e. thousands of lines of rustc errors). The selection logic checks if `target_pointer_width = "64"` and uses the 64-bit backend, or falls back to the 32-bit backend otherwise. This means the crate will always have a valid backend regardless of the pointer width, although there may be odd edge cases for exotic platforms which would optimally use the 64-bit backend but have a non-"64" target pointer width for whatever reason. We can handle those cases as they come up.
tarcieri
force-pushed
the
simplified-backend-selection
branch
from
November 13, 2022 16:36
935f182
to
6d69e75
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As proposed in #414, this commit changes the backend selection approach, introspecting
target_pointer_width
to selectu32_backend
vsu64_backend
(orfiat_u32_backend
/fiat_u64_backend
if thefiat_backend
feature is enabled).This helps eliminate the use of non-additive features, and also the rather confusing errors that happen if multiple backends are selected (i.e. thousands of lines of rustc errors).
The selection logic checks if
target_pointer_width = "64"
and uses the 64-bit backend, or falls back to the 32-bit backend otherwise. This means the crate will always have a valid backend regardless of the pointer width, although there may be odd edge cases for exotic platforms which would optimally use the 64-bit backend but have a non-"64" target pointer width for whatever reason. We can handle those cases as they come up.