parser-cov: tweak key event detection for LOCK_EVASION #163
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kdudka
added a commit
to kdudka/csdiff
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
Instead of `use_same_locks_for_read_and_modify` we need to pick `thread1_overwrites_value_in_field` in the example used as a test. Closes: csutils#163
kdudka
force-pushed
the
cov-parser-lock-evasion
branch
from
62d2f25 to
fe49207
Compare
Instead of `use_same_locks_for_read_and_modify` we need to pick `thread1_overwrites_value_in_field` in the example used as a test. Closes: csutils#163
kdudka
force-pushed
the
cov-parser-lock-evasion
branch
from
fe49207 to
bdb8014
Compare
|
This pull request is now obsoleted with #165. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Instead of
use_same_locks_for_read_and_modifywe need to pickthread1_overwrites_value_in_fieldin the example used as a test.