fix: taro adapter timeout

[gcfeng]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Below are the latest release updates:

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved network request handling by addressing timeout issues, resulting in more reliable and responsive API interactions.

• Chores

  • Updated the package version to the latest beta release, ensuring enhanced stability and overall performance.

These improvements contribute to a smoother user experience when interacting with the API. We appreciate your continued support and feedback.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new JSON documentation file for the @coze/taro-api package that records a patch for a timeout issue. It also updates the package version from 0.0.7-beta.1 to 0.0.7-beta.2 and modifies the taroAdapter function in the API source to include a timeout parameter. These changes formally document the patch, adjust the interface for handling request timeouts, and ensure version consistency.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
common/changes/.../fix-taro-timeout_2025-03-17-09-16.json	Added new JSON file documenting a patch for the taro adapter's timeout issue.
packages/coze-taro/package.json	Updated version from 0.0.7-beta.1 to 0.0.7-beta.2.
packages/coze-taro/src/api.ts	Modified taroAdapter to include a timeout parameter in its request configuration.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant A as CozeAPI
    participant T as taroAdapter
    participant R as Request Function

    C->>A: Calls API function
    A->>T: Pass config (url, method, data, headers, timeout)
    T->>R: Forward request with complete configuration
    R-->>T: Return response
    T-->>A: Return processed response
    A-->>C: Return final response

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• feat: add timeout #60: Addresses similar timeout functionality in the @coze/taro-api, closely aligning with the current changes.

Suggested reviewers

• jsongo

Poem

I'm a hopping little coder,
With carrots of code fresh and new,
I patch timeouts and update versions,
My burrow's filled with changes true,
A bunny bound by lines of code—woohoo!
Hop along, new features in view!
🐇🥕

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)

• We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
  - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

common/changes/@coze/taro-api/fix-taro-timeout_2025-03-17-09-16.json (1)

1-11: Change log entry correctly documents the fix

The change log properly identifies this as a patch-level change addressing the timeout functionality in the taro adapter. This documentation is important for tracking the evolution of the codebase.

A minor suggestion: Consider making the comment slightly more descriptive, such as "Fix timeout parameter handling in taro adapter" to give more context about what was fixed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8efa55 and d4695f0.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• common/changes/@coze/taro-api/fix-taro-timeout_2025-03-17-09-16.json (1 hunks)
• packages/coze-taro/package.json (2 hunks)
• packages/coze-taro/src/api.ts (2 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)

• GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
• GitHub Check: Node.js v20 (ubuntu-latest)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

packages/coze-taro/package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump looks appropriate

The version increment from 0.0.7-beta.1 to 0.0.7-beta.2 is consistent with the patch-level change being made to address the timeout issue.

packages/coze-taro/src/api.ts (2)

53-53: Well-implemented timeout parameter extraction

Adding the timeout parameter to the destructuring assignment ensures it's properly extracted from the config object.

---

64-64: Fix properly passes timeout to request function

The timeout parameter is now correctly passed to the Taro request function, addressing the timeout issue. This change ensures that any timeout configuration specified by users will be properly applied to the underlying Taro requests.