Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(simapp/v2): wire swagger in testnet cmd #23570

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Jan 31, 2025

Description

Fixes error when using simapp testnet command.


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for configuring Swagger server with new configuration options
    • Integrated Swagger API documentation into the testnet setup
    • Introduced a new method for creating server instances with custom configuration
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced server initialization flexibility
    • Improved developer experience by adding API documentation capabilities

@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2025 15:26
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

level=warning msg="[runner] Can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter: buildir: failed to load package sqlite3: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/bvinc/go-sqlite-lite/sqlite3""
level=error msg="Running error: can't run linter goanalysis_metalinter\nbuildir: failed to load package sqlite3: could not load export data: no export data for "github.com/bvinc/go-sqlite-lite/sqlite3""

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new method NewWithConfigOptions in the Swagger server package, enabling more flexible server configuration. In the testnet.go file, this method is utilized to create a Swagger server with a specific port (8090) during testnet initialization. The changes enhance the server's configuration capabilities by providing a more modular approach to setting up servers with custom options, specifically for Swagger API documentation and testing.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/v2/api/swagger/server.go Added NewWithConfigOptions[T transaction.Tx](opts ...CfgOption) *Server[T] method
simapp/v2/simdv2/cmd/testnet.go - Added Swagger package import
- Introduced swaggerPort variable
- Created swaggerConfig and swaggerServer variables
- Updated initTestnetFiles to include Swagger server configuration

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant TestnetInit
    participant SwaggerServer
    participant ServerConfig

    Developer->>TestnetInit: Initiate testnet
    TestnetInit->>SwaggerServer: NewWithConfigOptions()
    SwaggerServer-->>ServerConfig: Configure with options
    ServerConfig-->>TestnetInit: Return configured server
    TestnetInit->>TestnetInit: Add Swagger server to server list
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:server/v2 api, C:server/v2 appmanager

Suggested reviewers

  • tac0turtle
  • akhilkumarpilli
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2 C:server/v2 api labels Jan 31, 2025
@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge January 31, 2025 15:28
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
simapp/v2/simdv2/cmd/testnet.go (1)

375-376: Consider adding error handling for server configuration.

While the implementation is correct, it might be good to add error handling for the server configuration to maintain consistency with production standards.

-		swaggerServer := swagger.NewWithConfigOptions[T](swagger.OverwriteDefaultConfig(swaggerConfig))
-		server := serverv2.NewServer[T](serverCfg, cometServer, storeServer, grpcServer, grpcgatewayServer, restServer, telemetryServer, swaggerServer)
+		swaggerServer, err := swagger.NewWithConfigOptions[T](swagger.OverwriteDefaultConfig(swaggerConfig))
+		if err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("failed to create swagger server: %w", err)
+		}
+		server, err := serverv2.NewServer[T](serverCfg, cometServer, storeServer, grpcServer, grpcgatewayServer, restServer, telemetryServer, swaggerServer)
+		if err != nil {
+			return fmt.Errorf("failed to create server: %w", err)
+		}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8eb6822 and 27103e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • server/v2/api/swagger/server.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/v2/simdv2/cmd/testnet.go (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
server/v2/api/swagger/server.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

simapp/v2/simdv2/cmd/testnet.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: tests (00)
  • GitHub Check: test-simapp-v2
  • GitHub Check: test-system-v2
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: golangci-lint
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/v2/api/swagger/server.go (1)

67-74: LGTM! Clean and well-documented implementation.

The new constructor method follows Go's idiomatic patterns and clearly documents its limitations.

simapp/v2/simdv2/cmd/testnet.go (3)

192-192: LGTM! Port number choice is appropriate.

The Swagger port (8090) is well-chosen as it doesn't conflict with other service ports.


235-238: LGTM! Single machine configuration is properly handled.

The Swagger configuration correctly handles port offsets for single machine setups, maintaining consistency with other services.


375-376: LGTM! Server integration is clean and consistent.

The Swagger server is properly integrated into the server list, following the same pattern as other server components.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 31, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 009bcc3 Jan 31, 2025
72 of 74 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/fix-testnet branch January 31, 2025 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C:server/v2 api C:server/v2 Issues related to server/v2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants