Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: re-add v1 code #23545

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: re-add v1 code #23545

wants to merge 30 commits into from

Conversation

aljo242
Copy link
Collaborator

@aljo242 aljo242 commented Jan 28, 2025

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Important

Review skipped

More than 25% of the files skipped due to max files limit. The review is being skipped to prevent a low-quality review.

62 files out of 161 files are above the max files limit of 75. Please upgrade to Pro plan to get higher limits.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Comment on lines +722 to +727
go func() {
fmt.Println("Press the Enter Key to terminate all validator processes")
if _, err := fmt.Scanln(); err == nil {
close(shutdownCh) // Signal shutdown
}
}()

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Spawning a Go routine Note test

Spawning a Go routine may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +732 to +736
go func() {
<-sigCh // Wait for Ctrl+C
fmt.Println("\nCtrl+C detected, terminating validator processes...")
close(shutdownCh) // Signal shutdown
}()

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Spawning a Go routine Note test

Spawning a Go routine may be a possible source of non-determinism
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

those additions should stay

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

?

@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ MOCKS_DIR = $(CURDIR)/tests/mocks
HTTPS_GIT := https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk.git
DOCKER := $(shell which docker)
PROJECT_NAME = $(shell git remote get-url origin | xargs basename -s .git)
COSMOS_BUILD_OPTIONS += ' v2'

rocksdb_version=v9.6.1
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can be deleted rocksdb support has been dropped

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'd do a git checkout of release/v0.52.x for this file, as it will be mostly be incorrect with git revert

@@ -24,8 +23,8 @@ test-all: test-unit test-integration test-ledger-mock test-race
.PHONY: test-system
test-system: build
mkdir -p ./tests/systemtests/binaries/
cp $(BUILDDIR)/simdv2 ./tests/systemtests/binaries/
COSMOS_BUILD_OPTIONS=v2 $(MAKE) -C tests/systemtests test
cp $(BUILDDIR)/simd ./tests/systemtests/binaries/
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
cp $(BUILDDIR)/simd ./tests/systemtests/binaries/
cp $(BUILDDIR)/simd$(if $(findstring v2,$(COSMOS_BUILD_OPTIONS)),v2) ./tests/systemtests/binaries/

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted and brought back

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can be deleted (it is in systemtest/`)

@@ -116,7 +122,12 @@ func TestGroupCommands(t *testing.T) {
systest.RequireTxSuccess(t, rsp)

// query votes
voteResp := string(systest.GetRequest(t, fmt.Sprintf("%s/cosmos/group/v1/vote_by_proposal_voter/%s/%s", baseurl, proposalId, valAddr)))

// TODO: remove isV2() check once v2 is integrated with grpc gateway
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, grpc gateway works in v2

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, main should upgrade from 0.52 not 0.50

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, confix got loosened check on both branches.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, we should import cosmos/gogoproto not protobuf

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we reverted, no need to bring back a server dep while it isn't strictly required

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, no need to import server here

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be reverted, that was a linter fix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants