-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Paper: homogenise and tidy .bib file (#112)
* Update 4-Quick_Start.ipynb * Update 2-Questions.md * Update Workshop_1_Write_Up.md * Update Solving_problem_with_delay_learning.ipynb * Update Workshop_1_Write_Up.md * Homogenise and tidy .bib file
- Loading branch information
1 parent
69d2f42
commit fd89ad9
Showing
1 changed file
with
40 additions
and
40 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,47 +1,47 @@ | ||
| @article{Grothe2010, | ||
| author = {Benedikt Grothe and Michael Pecka and David Mcalpine}, | ||
| doi = {10.1152/physrev.00026.2009.-The}, | ||
| title = {Mechanisms of Sound Localization in Mammals}, | ||
| url = {www.prv.org}, | ||
| year = {2010}, | ||
| title = {Mechanisms of Sound Localization in Mammals}, | ||
| author = {Benedikt Grothe and Michael Pecka and David Mcalpine}, | ||
| year = {2010}, | ||
| doi = {10.1152/physrev.00026.2009.-The}, | ||
| url = {www.prv.org} | ||
| } | ||
| @generic{Grothe2014, | ||
| abstract = {Our concepts of sound localization in the vertebrate brain are widely based on the general assumption that both the ability to detect air-borne sounds and the neuronal processing are homologous in archosaurs (present day crocodiles and birds) and mammals. Yet studies repeatedly report conflicting results on the neuronal circuits and mechanisms, in particular the role of inhibition, as well as the coding strategies between avian and mammalian model systems. Here we argue that mammalian and avian phylogeny of spatial hearing is characterized by a convergent evolution of hearing air-borne sounds rather than by homology. In particular, the different evolutionary origins of tympanic ears and the different availability of binaural cues in early mammals and archosaurs imposed distinct constraints on the respective binaural processing mechanisms. The role of synaptic inhibition in generating binaural spatial sensitivity in mammals is highlighted, as it reveals a unifying principle of mammalian circuit design for encoding sound position. Together, we combine evolutionary, anatomical and physiological arguments for making a clear distinction between mammalian processing mechanisms and coding strategies and those of archosaurs. We emphasize that a consideration of the convergent nature of neuronal mechanisms will significantly increase the explanatory power of studies of spatial processing in both mammals and birds.}, | ||
| author = {Benedikt Grothe and Michael Pecka}, | ||
| doi = {10.3389/fncir.2014.00116}, | ||
| issn = {16625110}, | ||
| issue = {OCT}, | ||
| journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, | ||
| keywords = {Archosaurs,Binaural hearing,Birds,Evolution,GABA,Glycine,LSO,MSO}, | ||
| month = {10}, | ||
| pmid = {25324726}, | ||
| publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, | ||
| title = {The natural history of sound localization in mammals-a story of neuronal inhibition}, | ||
| volume = {8}, | ||
| year = {2014}, | ||
| title = {The natural history of sound localization in mammals-a story of neuronal inhibition}, | ||
| author = {Benedikt Grothe and Michael Pecka}, | ||
| year = {2014}, | ||
| month = {10}, | ||
| journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, | ||
| publisher = {Frontiers Media S.A.}, | ||
| volume = {8}, | ||
| doi = {10.3389/fncir.2014.00116}, | ||
| issn = {16625110}, | ||
| abstract = {Our concepts of sound localization in the vertebrate brain are widely based on the general assumption that both the ability to detect air-borne sounds and the neuronal processing are homologous in archosaurs (present day crocodiles and birds) and mammals. Yet studies repeatedly report conflicting results on the neuronal circuits and mechanisms, in particular the role of inhibition, as well as the coding strategies between avian and mammalian model systems. Here we argue that mammalian and avian phylogeny of spatial hearing is characterized by a convergent evolution of hearing air-borne sounds rather than by homology. In particular, the different evolutionary origins of tympanic ears and the different availability of binaural cues in early mammals and archosaurs imposed distinct constraints on the respective binaural processing mechanisms. The role of synaptic inhibition in generating binaural spatial sensitivity in mammals is highlighted, as it reveals a unifying principle of mammalian circuit design for encoding sound position. Together, we combine evolutionary, anatomical and physiological arguments for making a clear distinction between mammalian processing mechanisms and coding strategies and those of archosaurs. We emphasize that a consideration of the convergent nature of neuronal mechanisms will significantly increase the explanatory power of studies of spatial processing in both mammals and birds.}, | ||
| issue = {OCT}, | ||
| keywords = {Archosaurs,Binaural hearing,Birds,Evolution,GABA,Glycine,LSO,MSO}, | ||
| pmid = {25324726} | ||
| } | ||
| @article{Yin2019, | ||
| abstract = {Spatial hearing, and more specifically the ability to localize sounds in space, is one of the most studied and best understood aspects of hearing. Because there is no coding of acoustic space at the receptor organ, physiological sensitivity to spatial aspects of sounds first emerges in the central nervous system. Much progress has been made in the identification and characterization of the circuits in the auditory brainstem that create sensitivity to binaural and monaural cues toward acoustic space. We review the progress over the past third of a century, with a focus on the mammalian brainstem and on the anatomy and cellular physiology underlying the physiological tuning of monaural and binaural circuits to acoustic cues toward spatial hearing. In addition to examining the detailed mechanisms involved in the processing of the three main spatial cues, we also review the integration of these cues and their use toward behavior. © 2019 American Physiological Society.}, | ||
| author = {Tom C.T. Yin and Phil H. Smith and Philip X. Joris}, | ||
| doi = {10.1002/cphy.c180036}, | ||
| issn = {20404603}, | ||
| issue = {4}, | ||
| journal = {Comprehensive Physiology}, | ||
| month = {10}, | ||
| pages = {1503-1575}, | ||
| pmid = {31688966}, | ||
| publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, | ||
| title = {Neural mechanisms of binaural processing in the auditory brainstem}, | ||
| volume = {9}, | ||
| year = {2019}, | ||
| title = {Neural mechanisms of binaural processing in the auditory brainstem}, | ||
| author = {Tom C.T. Yin and Phil H. Smith and Philip X. Joris}, | ||
| year = {2019}, | ||
| month = {10}, | ||
| journal = {Comprehensive Physiology}, | ||
| publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd}, | ||
| volume = {9}, | ||
| pages = {1503--1575}, | ||
| doi = {10.1002/cphy.c180036}, | ||
| issn = {20404603}, | ||
| abstract = {Spatial hearing, and more specifically the ability to localize sounds in space, is one of the most studied and best understood aspects of hearing. Because there is no coding of acoustic space at the receptor organ, physiological sensitivity to spatial aspects of sounds first emerges in the central nervous system. Much progress has been made in the identification and characterization of the circuits in the auditory brainstem that create sensitivity to binaural and monaural cues toward acoustic space. We review the progress over the past third of a century, with a focus on the mammalian brainstem and on the anatomy and cellular physiology underlying the physiological tuning of monaural and binaural circuits to acoustic cues toward spatial hearing. In addition to examining the detailed mechanisms involved in the processing of the three main spatial cues, we also review the integration of these cues and their use toward behavior. © 2019 American Physiological Society.}, | ||
| issue = {4}, | ||
| pmid = {31688966} | ||
| } | ||
| @conference{Kluyver2016jupyter, | ||
| Title = {Jupyter Notebooks -- a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows}, | ||
| Author = {Thomas Kluyver and Benjamin Ragan-Kelley and Fernando P{\'e}rez and Brian Granger and Matthias Bussonnier and Jonathan Frederic and Kyle Kelley and Jessica Hamrick and Jason Grout and Sylvain Corlay and Paul Ivanov and Dami{\'a}n Avila and Safia Abdalla and Carol Willing}, | ||
| Booktitle = {Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas}, | ||
| Editor = {F. Loizides and B. Schmidt}, | ||
| Organization = {IOS Press}, | ||
| Pages = {87 - 90}, | ||
| Year = {2016}, | ||
| doi = {10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87}, | ||
| } | ||
| title = {Jupyter Notebooks -- a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows}, | ||
| author = {Thomas Kluyver and Benjamin Ragan-Kelley and Fernando P{\'e}rez and Brian Granger and Matthias Bussonnier and Jonathan Frederic and Kyle Kelley and Jessica Hamrick and Jason Grout and Sylvain Corlay and Paul Ivanov and Dami{\'a}n Avila and Safia Abdalla and Carol Willing}, | ||
| year = {2016}, | ||
| booktitle = {Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas}, | ||
| pages = {87--90}, | ||
| doi = {10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87}, | ||
| editor = {F. Loizides and B. Schmidt}, | ||
| organization = {IOS Press} | ||
| } |