add ggHH HEFT cards

[chuxue26]

Cards for ggHH HEFT production targetting early run3 results. The cards are copies of run2 ones, changing the basis to allow smooth HEFT/c2 scans and CM energy

The powheg model used was: ggHH

[acarvalh]

@tolange @wangjiannju for information

We are requesting the samples with high priority and appreciate the review effort here to allow fast production

[lviliani]

Hi, the number of calls (ncall1 and ncall2) seems a bit smaller than usual.

Did you check the cross section and uncertainty that you get, as well as the integration grids?

Some details can be found here:
https://cms-gen.gitbook.io/cms-generator-central-place/how-to-produce-gridpacks/powheg-box#step-2-stage-1-2-3

Maybe @covarell knows is this is reasonable for HH?

[chuxue26]

Hi, the number of calls (ncall1 and ncall2) seems a bit smaller than usual.

Did you check the cross section and uncertainty that you get, as well as the integration grids?

Some details can be found here: https://cms-gen.gitbook.io/cms-generator-central-place/how-to-produce-gridpacks/powheg-box#step-2-stage-1-2-3

Maybe @covarell knows is this is reasonable for HH?

Hi, I have checked the cross section and uncertainty, they all seem reasonable. And I used the check_bad_st1 1 and check_bad_st2 1 to check integration grids.

The run2 cards here also use the same number of calls.

Thank you very much!

[yihui-lai]

Hi @acarvalh @lviliani @chuxue26 Sorry for chiming in, but what's the difference between these cards and the old ones? https://github.com/cms-sw/genproductions/tree/master/bin/Powheg/production/Run3/13p6TeV/Higgs/gg_HH_HEFT
I think they are exactly the same?
I am asking because we were requested to upload the gridpacks corresponding to these cards, but we already have gridpacks from the old ones in cvmfs.

[chuxue26]

Hi @yihui-lai , could you please point out the cvmfs folder for the old gridpacks? We'll check it. Thank you!
We add one more excess point c2 = 2.24, kl = -20, kt = 1 in these cards

[yihui-lai]

Hi @chuxue26, if I understand correctly, only 1 out of 10 cards you added is really new (c2 = 2.24, kl = -20, kt = 1), the others are the same as what's in gg_HH_HEFT?

I can find 3 batches of gridpacks related with ggHH:

(1) uploaded on Feb 1 2023: /cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/phys_generator/gridpacks/slc7_amd64_gcc700/13p6TeV/powheg/V2/gg_HH/ggHH_slc7_amd64_gcc700_CMSSW_10_6_8_patch1_powheg_ggHH_kl_*

(2) uploaded on Apr 6 2023: /cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/phys_generator/gridpacks/RunIII/13p6TeV/slc7_amd64_gcc700/Powheg/V2/ggHH_slc7_amd64_gcc700_CMSSW_10_6_28_my_ggHH_kl_*

(3) uploaded Mar 19 2024:
/cvmfs/cms.cern.ch/phys_generator/gridpacks/RunIII/13p6TeV/slc7_amd64_gcc700/Powheg/V2/ggHH_slc7_amd64_gcc700_CMSSW_10_6_8_workdir3_ggHH_kl_*0.tgz

There are 3 gridpacks in (3), and MC contact already confirmed that they are the same as the gridpacks being produced with this set of cards you just uploaded. But I am not sure about (1) and (2). I think adding additional tags in the name of gridpacks could also reduce confusion for the future.

[acarvalh]

Hi @yihui-lai

I confirm that the duplication of cards was a miscommunication, and they are the same, with the exception of one.

I also confirm that the 3 gridpacks in your point (3) below are identical to the one existing there, and you can only pass the rest. I believe those are the conditions for running production. The three repeated points can be ignored

(3) uploaded Mar 19 2024:

[yihui-lai]

I think the gridpacks in (1) and (2) are also based on the same cards. So we already have the gridpack for 9 samples. Although I am not sure why they are duplicated in the past.
The only one you will need is this new point: c2 = 2.24, kl = -20, kt = 1?

[acarvalh]

Okay! Thank you @yihui-lai the duplication was plain lack of communication.