HCAL DQM small fixes of problems experienced during MWGR2

[vkhristenko]

resubmitting on top of the updated 80X since it wouldn't merge.
I closed previous PR because I didn't really know based from where to rebase. Just merging CMSSW80X branch showed a large number of commits... may be there was a better way...

VK

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @vkhristenko (Viktor Khristenko) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/HcalCommon
DQM/HcalTasks
DQMOffline/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @deguio, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11656/console
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/11658/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 5a2f7f4
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13543/11658/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
cad854b
8e8ed3d
f89595f
0e27df5
fdddf7a
dc44cd8
e4b1500
a5c91fe
440e538
0485b63
c759cab
5c54649
98e00d0
126eaa8
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13543/11658/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13543/11658/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-13543/11658/summary.html

[davidlange6]

@vkhristenko - please give this PR a meaningful name for the release notes. Thanks

[vkhristenko]

@davidlange6 - done

[Martin-Grunewald]

Hi,

This PR in 81X (was auto ported to 81X) seems to create a problem in 81X,
with this error message:

----- Begin Fatal Exception 03-Mar-2016 07:38:05 CET-----------------------
An exception of category 'Configuration' occurred while
   [0] Processing run: 1 lumi: 2 event: 301
   [1] Running path 'validation_step'
   [2] Calling event method for module MultiTrackValidator/'hiTrackValidator'
Exception Message:
Efficiency and fake TrackingParticle (refs) point to different collections (eff 3:256 fake 3:254). This is not supported. Efficiency TP set must be the same or a subset of the fake TP set.
----- End Fatal Exception -------------------------------------------------

It is a cmsDriver generated workflow:

# Auto generated configuration file
# using: 
# Revision: 1.19 
# Source: /local/reps/CMSSW/CMSSW/Configuration/Applications/python/ConfigBuilder.py,v 
# with command line options: RelVal --step=RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,VALIDATION,DQM --conditions=auto:run2_mc_HIon --filein=file:RelVal_DigiL1RawHLT_HIon_MC.root --custom_conditions= --fileout=RelVal_RECO_HIon_MC.root --number=25 --mc --no_exec --datatier SIM-RAW-HLT-RECO --eventcontent=RAW --customise=HLTrigger/Configuration/CustomConfigs.Base --era=Run2_HI --customise= --scenario=HeavyIons --python_filename=RelVal_RECO_HIon_MC.py --processName=RECO