Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add cluster-onboarding adr #9

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
# 008 Cluster Onboarding

- Status: [draft | proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md)] <!-- optional -->
- Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
- Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional. To customize the ordering without relying on Git creation dates and filenames -->
- Tags: [greenhouse / cloudoperators] <!-- optional -->
- Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->

## Context and Problem Statement

[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]

## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->

- [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
- … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->

## Considered Options

- [option 1]
- [option 2]
- [option 3]
- … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->

## Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]",
because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->

- [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …

### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->

- [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
- …

## Pros and Cons of the Options | Evaluation of options <!-- optional -->

### [option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

### [option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

### [option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

| Decision Driver | Rating | Reason |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| [decision driver a] | +++ | Good, because [argument a] | |
| [decision driver b] | --- | Good, because [argument b] |
| [decision driver c] | -- | Bad, because [argument c] |
| [decision driver d] | o | Neutral, because [argument d] |

## Related Decision Records <!-- optional -->

[previous decision record, e.g., an ADR, which is solved by this one | next decision record, e.g., an ADR, which solves this one | … | pointer to more information]

## Links <!-- optional -->

- [Link type](link to adr) <!-- example: Refined by [xxx](yyyymmdd-xxx.md) -->
- … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->
Loading