You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While the development of this project seems very inactive now, and looks like some people (for example, the author of this comment) has already give up from using ibus-chewing, and I personally don't use bopomofo anymore.
But, recently, I set up a GNU/Linux environment for my non-tech friend. So I try to install ibus-chewing for them. It's very frustration to use. Some UX-improvement feature, like #147 and #152, has been merged but you can't use it if you don't compile ibus-chewing by yourself!
While there are many alternative options such as ibus-rime etc., or you can even just don't use ibus and instead use fcitx. But I believe ibus is still widely used and actively maintained, elementary os even integrated ibus into their system, and ibus-chewing's user experience is more familiar for those who come from Windows into GNU/Linux. So it would be nice if we can just have a new version tagged and people can just use the newer, better version.
Edited: math
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
binotaliu
changed the title
Any plan to tag new version?
Any plan to tag a new version?
Jul 23, 2022
Hi there,
It has been 6 years since last time this repository got a version tag. While in this period, many new feature / bug fixes got merged. There are even a milestone that been named
1.6.1
, but there was never a1.6.1
version been tagged.While the development of this project seems very inactive now, and looks like some people (for example, the author of this comment) has already give up from using
ibus-chewing
, and I personally don't use bopomofo anymore.But, recently, I set up a GNU/Linux environment for my non-tech friend. So I try to install
ibus-chewing
for them. It's very frustration to use. Some UX-improvement feature, like #147 and #152, has been merged but you can't use it if you don't compileibus-chewing
by yourself!While there are many alternative options such as
ibus-rime
etc., or you can even just don't useibus
and instead usefcitx
. But I believeibus
is still widely used and actively maintained, elementary os even integrated ibus into their system, andibus-chewing
's user experience is more familiar for those who come from Windows into GNU/Linux. So it would be nice if we can just have a new version tagged and people can just use the newer, better version.Edited: math
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: