Update blobstream-proof-queries.md #1757
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on updating the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (3)
Line range hint
1-7: Consider adding a brief introductionThe document starts directly with prerequisites. Consider adding a brief introduction before the prerequisites section to provide context about Blobstream proof queries and why they are important. This would help readers understand the purpose and significance of the content that follows.
Line range hint
89-136: Enhance code snippet readabilityConsider breaking down longer code snippets into smaller, more digestible parts. For example, the Go code snippet starting at line 89 could be split into multiple sections, each explaining a specific part of the process. This would make it easier for readers to follow and understand the code.
Line range hint
138-170: Clarify technical conceptsIn the section explaining the Celestia square and commitment scheme, consider adding more detailed explanations or visual aids to help readers understand these complex concepts. For example, you could provide a step-by-step breakdown of how a share is committed to in Blobstream, using the diagrams as reference points.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (2)
Line range hint
1-1562: LGTM with minor suggestions for improvementThis document provides a comprehensive guide to Blobstream proof queries, covering both theoretical concepts and practical implementations. The content is well-structured and technically accurate. Consider the following suggestions for future improvements:
- Add a brief introduction to provide context for the document.
- Break down longer code snippets into smaller, more focused sections.
- Enhance explanations of complex technical concepts, possibly with additional visual aids.
- Ensure consistent formatting across all code snippets.
These minor enhancements would further improve an already valuable resource.
1560-1562:⚠️ Potential issueImprove code formatting consistency
Ensure that all code snippets are consistently formatted. For example, the lines at 1560-1562 appear to be a continuation of a code block but are not properly formatted. Wrap these lines in appropriate code block markers to maintain consistency with the rest of the document.
Apply this fix:
-sample project. Learn more on the [Lightlink docs](https://docs.lightlink.io/lightlink-protocol/achitecture-and-design/lightlink-protocol-deep-dive#id-5.-hummingbird). - +``` +sample project. Learn more on the [Lightlink docs](https://docs.lightlink.io/lightlink-protocol/achitecture-and-design/lightlink-protocol-deep-dive#id-5.-hummingbird). +```Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Overview
Summary by CodeRabbit
blobstream-proof-queries.mdguide.prove_shares_v2.