Improve CSV reporting of benchmarks, add stencil system benchmark

[PeterTh]

This PR is in preparation of a follow-up which will use tags in the evaluation for categorization.
This needs to be done in 2 steps due to the involvement of the repository state in the CI benchmark worklow.

Preparatory changes:

• Outputs the tag list in to the CSV reporter.
• Changes the script to be resilient to csv layout/order changes.
• Unifies tagging in benchmarks.
• Adds another stencil-like system benchmark.

The last point might seem a bit unrelated. I added it because otherwise, our "full system" benchmark category would include only the many-task benchmark, which is quite far from Celerity's common use case currently.
We always wanted to extend this set anyway, so now I made a first step with a very simple iterative stencil benchmark that should better represent some common usage scenarios in terms of runtime system performance impact.

The goal is to be able to finish https://github.com/celerity/meta/issues/47 in the follow-up.

[github-actions]

Check-perf-impact results: (e3a4351784531e1861bff0cb14c92210)

⚠️ Significant slowdown in some microbenchmark results: 16 individual benchmarks affected
🚀 Significant speedup in some microbenchmark results: 16 individual benchmarks affected
➕ Added microbenchmark(s): benchmark stencil pattern with N time steps - 50 / iterations, benchmark stencil pattern with N time steps - 1000 / iterations

Overall relative execution time: 1.01x (mean of relative medians)

[PeterTh]

This goes to show that the threshold of "significance" also needs to be tweaked in the follow-up PR which reworks the reporting script.

[github-actions]

clang-tidy made some suggestions

[psalz]

LGTM!