Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🩹 Non-critical fixes w.r.t. the ClusterComplete merge (#390) #652

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 3, 2025

Conversation

wlambooy
Copy link
Collaborator

@wlambooy wlambooy commented Jan 30, 2025

Description

This PR resolves two non-critical issues that were discovered shortly after merging #390 .

Checklist:

  • The pull request only contains commits that are related to it.
  • I have added appropriate tests and documentation.
  • I have added a changelog entry.
  • I have created/adjusted the Python bindings for any new or updated functionality.
  • I have made sure that all CI jobs on GitHub pass.
  • The pull request introduces no new warnings and follows the project's style guidelines.

@wlambooy wlambooy changed the title 🩹 Non-critical fixes w.r.t. the ClusterComplete merge 🩹 Non-critical fixes w.r.t. the ClusterComplete merge (#390) Jan 30, 2025
@wlambooy wlambooy added the small fix Non-critical issue or inconsistency label Jan 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clang-tidy made some suggestions

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.40%. Comparing base (4f6cf7e) to head (5766e0d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #652   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.40%   98.40%           
=======================================
  Files         252      252           
  Lines       40856    40856           
  Branches     1863     1864    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        40205    40206    +1     
+ Misses        651      650    -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4f6cf7e...5766e0d. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@wlambooy wlambooy requested a review from Drewniok January 31, 2025 09:03
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 1, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@wlambooy wlambooy requested a review from Drewniok February 1, 2025 18:36
Copy link
Collaborator

@Drewniok Drewniok left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Many thanks! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@wlambooy wlambooy enabled auto-merge February 3, 2025 10:18
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@wlambooy wlambooy disabled auto-merge February 3, 2025 13:50
@wlambooy wlambooy enabled auto-merge (squash) February 3, 2025 13:50
@marcelwa marcelwa disabled auto-merge February 3, 2025 17:40
@marcelwa marcelwa merged commit e974713 into cda-tum:main Feb 3, 2025
49 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
small fix Non-critical issue or inconsistency
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants