Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed vignette for #5
PTELL is a little complicated so open to other approaches.
A final issue I haven't yet found the best way to raise is that the year over year percent increase in the capped extension exceeds the PTELL limit BUT that doesn't necessarily mean that the year over year increase for an individual taxpayer would since the PTELL limit is designed to let a taxing body capture new property and expired tif increment etc which generally is referred to as not a tax increase for existing taxpayers even though it leads to increased revenue. That being said, I think being able to show this relationship is a really interesting one but the ways I've played around don't communicate the issue clearly. I tried calculating a tax bill with a constant EAV and also simulating a tax bill which started at a specific EAV in year 2006 and then mirrored the percent changes in the total EAV available to CPS every year. Both were attempts to remove the impacts of relative AV changes (the % share that a property has of the total EAV) to isolate the changes in capped/uncapped tax bills.