Remove cardano-configurations submodule

[locallycompact]

As far as I can tell this isn't used. It's interfering with using it as a source-repository-package for hydra-explorer.

[github-actions]

Transaction costs

Sizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using arbitrary values and results are not fully deterministic and comparable to previous runs.

Metadata
Generated at	2024-10-15 11:48:48.241948408 UTC
Max. memory units	14000000
Max. CPU units	10000000000
Max. tx size (kB)	16384

Script summary

Name	Hash	Size (Bytes)
νInitial	b512161ccb0652d7e9a0b540e4a3c808f73d6558a4bcabf374d85880	3969
νCommit	ea444d37d226e71eef73ac78d149750da977feb588900135bf9e8221	692
νHead	2253ddd95837c7aacc8635a971caaea743434152dd8dd2849bdf4162	10797
μHead	4d648ca239040b0e87901835aa11423e7aa3bd947ce6befe7db1bae8*	4508
νDeposit	1a011f23b139a6426767026bde10319546485d553219a5848cdac4e5	2993

• The minting policy hash is only usable for comparison. As the script is parameterized, the actual script is unique per head.

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	5094	5.61	2.21	0.44
2	5297	6.99	2.76	0.46
3	5499	8.37	3.30	0.48
5	5899	11.32	4.48	0.53
10	6904	18.11	7.16	0.65
57	16356	82.91	32.79	1.78

Commit transaction costs

This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.

UTxO	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	569	10.84	4.26	0.29
2	755	14.31	5.80	0.34
3	942	17.92	7.39	0.39
5	1320	25.56	10.73	0.49
10	2257	47.11	19.97	0.77
19	3937	94.71	39.81	1.38

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	57	560	20.58	7.85	0.40
2	114	671	28.88	10.99	0.49
3	170	782	35.11	13.37	0.56
4	227	897	41.35	15.77	0.64
5	280	1004	49.05	18.71	0.73
6	339	1116	63.43	24.09	0.89
7	395	1227	62.38	23.76	0.88
8	450	1338	83.17	31.52	1.11
9	505	1449	99.97	37.82	1.29
10	560	1560	96.15	36.53	1.26

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	637	18.68	8.17	0.39
2	795	19.23	9.10	0.41
3	946	22.40	11.15	0.45
5	1378	27.21	14.56	0.54
10	2002	33.45	20.79	0.66
48	7855	97.96	75.26	1.83

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	656	20.87	9.34	0.42
2	745	21.89	10.42	0.44
3	931	23.82	12.24	0.47
5	1251	26.93	15.38	0.53
10	2019	35.52	23.55	0.70
50	8056	99.40	86.22	1.93

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	667	26.76	11.46	0.48
2	814	28.61	13.05	0.51
3	942	30.39	14.60	0.54
5	1217	33.90	17.71	0.61
10	2108	43.78	26.56	0.79
40	6364	99.27	75.48	1.78

Abort transaction costs

There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	4979	15.38	6.58	0.54
2	5105	21.97	9.45	0.62
3	5226	28.00	12.10	0.69
4	5370	35.77	15.52	0.79
5	5458	41.63	18.02	0.86
6	5750	50.68	22.19	0.97
7	5765	54.21	23.50	1.01
8	6041	63.94	28.14	1.14
9	6122	70.40	30.78	1.21
10	6311	76.46	33.49	1.29
11	6226	78.04	33.85	1.30
12	6416	86.70	37.63	1.40
13	6431	89.73	38.77	1.44

FanOut transaction costs

Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	0	0	5089	9.88	4.13	0.48
10	1	57	5123	11.16	4.90	0.50
10	5	284	5259	16.03	7.87	0.57
10	10	568	5428	21.87	11.49	0.65
10	20	1138	5767	33.64	18.76	0.81
10	30	1705	6107	45.04	25.88	0.97
10	40	2275	6446	56.54	33.03	1.13
10	50	2846	6788	69.03	40.62	1.30
10	76	4329	7673	98.68	59.14	1.71

End-to-end benchmark results

This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master code.

Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.

Generated at 2024-10-15 11:50:36.340451351 UTC

Baseline Scenario

Number of nodes	1
Number of txs	300
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	4.530364280
P99	8.986571919999983ms
P95	6.138804700000001ms
P50	4.3074345ms
Number of Invalid txs	0

Three local nodes

Number of nodes	3
Number of txs	900
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms)	24.298012134
P99	118.21130888999998ms
P95	30.872443249999986ms
P50	21.635948999999997ms
Number of Invalid txs	0

[github-actions]

Transaction cost differences

Script summary

Name	Size (Bytes)
νInitial	-
νCommit	-
νHead	-
μHead	-
νDeposit	-

Init transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	-	$${\color{green}-0.20}$$	$${\color{green}-0.09}$$	-
2	+7	+0.31	+0.13	-
3	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	+0.08	+0.04	-
5	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.04}$$	$${\color{green}-0.02}$$	-
10	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.10}$$	$${\color{green}-0.04}$$	-
57	-	-	-	-

Commit transaction costs

UTxO	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	-	-	-	-
2	+1	-	-	-
3	+1	-	-	-
5	-	-	-	-
10	+4	-	-	-
19	$${\color{green}-9.00}$$	-	-	-

CollectCom transaction costs

Parties	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	-	-	+0.03	+0.01	-
2	-	+4.0	$${\color{green}-1.10}$$	$${\color{green}-0.41}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
3	+2.0	-	$${\color{green}-2.27}$$	$${\color{green}-0.84}$$	$${\color{green}-0.03}$$
4	$${\color{green}-2.00}$$	$${\color{green}-4.00}$$	$${\color{green}-3.88}$$	$${\color{green}-1.42}$$	$${\color{green}-0.04}$$
5	-	$${\color{green}-5.00}$$	$${\color{green}-6.73}$$	$${\color{green}-2.48}$$	$${\color{green}-0.07}$$
6	+2.0	-	$${\color{green}-3.56}$$	$${\color{green}-1.29}$$	$${\color{green}-0.04}$$
7	$${\color{green}-2.00}$$	$${\color{green}-4.00}$$	$${\color{green}-8.32}$$	$${\color{green}-3.07}$$	$${\color{green}-0.09}$$
8	+2.0	$${\color{green}-4.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.75}$$	$${\color{green}-0.62}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
9	-	$${\color{green}-4.00}$$	$${\color{green}-5.24}$$	$${\color{green}-1.87}$$	$${\color{green}-0.05}$$

Cost of Decrement Transaction

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	$${\color{green}-9.00}$$	-	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$	-
2	$${\color{green}-2.00}$$	-	-	-
3	$${\color{green}-120.00}$$	$${\color{green}-2.41}$$	$${\color{green}-0.90}$$	$${\color{green}-0.03}$$
5	+63.0	+0.72	+0.27	+0.01
10	+40.0	$${\color{green}-0.35}$$	$${\color{green}-0.21}$$	-

Close transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	$${\color{green}-44.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.33}$$	$${\color{green}-0.30}$$	-
2	+13.0	+0.04	+0.02	-
3	+42.0	+0.29	+0.28	+0.01
5	+249.0	+1.97	+1.67	+0.04
10	+18.0	$${\color{green}-0.07}$$	$${\color{green}-0.08}$$	-

Contest transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	$${\color{green}-39.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.45}$$	$${\color{green}-0.35}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
2	$${\color{green}-59.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.45}$$	$${\color{green}-0.37}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
3	+8.0	-	-	-
5	+119.0	+0.54	+0.59	+0.02
10	$${\color{green}-143.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.09}$$	$${\color{green}-0.82}$$	$${\color{green}-0.02}$$

Abort transaction costs

Parties	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
1	+27.0	-	+0.02	-
2	$${\color{green}-29.00}$$	+0.1	+0.03	-
3	$${\color{green}-15.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.59}$$	$${\color{green}-0.32}$$	-
4	$${\color{green}-102.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.30}$$	$${\color{green}-0.72}$$	$${\color{green}-0.02}$$
5	+37.0	+0.91	+0.47	+0.01
6	$${\color{green}-94.00}$$	$${\color{green}-3.21}$$	$${\color{green}-1.61}$$	$${\color{green}-0.04}$$
7	$${\color{green}-59.00}$$	$${\color{green}-0.28}$$	$${\color{green}-0.21}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
8	$${\color{green}-34.00}$$	+0.78	+0.2	+0.01
9	$${\color{green}-112.00}$$	+1.63	+0.57	+0.01
10	+48.0	+2.76	+1.41	+0.03
11	+43.0	+1.07	+0.52	+0.01
12	+36.0	+9.97	+4.56	+0.11

FanOut transaction costs

Parties	UTxO	UTxO (bytes)	Tx size	% max Mem	% max CPU	Min fee ₳
10	-	-	+1	+0.2	+0.08	-
10	-	-	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	-	-	-
10	-	-	-	+0.09	+0.03	-
10	-	-	-	+0.39	+0.17	+0.01
10	-	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	+0.2	+0.08	+0.01
10	-	+2	+2	$${\color{green}-0.59}$$	$${\color{green}-0.25}$$	$${\color{green}-0.01}$$
10	-	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.00}$$	$${\color{green}-1.18}$$	$${\color{green}-0.51}$$	$${\color{green}-0.02}$$
10	-	-	-	+0.19	+0.09	+0.01
10	+1	+59	+36	+0.38	+0.38	+0.01

[github-actions]

Test Results

  7 files  ±0  164 suites  ±0   26m 38s ⏱️ -4s
557 tests ±0  551 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
559 runs  ±0  553 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit e47e129. ± Comparison against base commit 34c9916.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[v0d1ch]

I think this submodule is used, we describe it in our tutorials and/or demo I think too.

[locallycompact]

It doesn't seem like it is used. Our instructions only refer to a clone of this repository and nothing references it outside of that.

[noonio]

Yay!