-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature(engine): add activityIdIn filter to HistoricProcessInstanceQuery #4619
Merged
venetrius
merged 11 commits into
master
from
4618-add-ActivityIdIn-filter-to-HistoricProcessInstanceQuery
Sep 20, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
da6ee40
feature(engine): add activityIdIn filter to HistoricProcessInstanceQuery
venetrius a09c5df
add tests for multiple scope and when failing activity
venetrius e3f6b72
add activityIdIn tests based on runtimeQuery test
venetrius 211ebc4
Update engine-rest/engine-rest/src/main/java/org/camunda/bpm/engine/r…
venetrius a1a554b
test activityIdIn filter whith deleted / completed instances
venetrius 853438f
update test for activityIdIn where AsyncBefore, AsyncAfter or Compens…
venetrius bd259a6
Revert "update test for activityIdIn where AsyncBefore, AsyncAfter or…
venetrius 3b0d072
update docs and test for AsyncBefore, AsyncAfter or Compensation
venetrius 0c46579
update docs -> less verbose
venetrius fa47e2e
fix: join with incident instead of job to avoid bug in activityId filter
tasso94 e6dc437
Apply suggestions from code review
venetrius File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❓ Do we need to consider adding some indexes here? To ensure performance for the modification. Or the existing indexes will be good enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's be careful with indices on history tables. I would only add them when we get feedback. Adding a new index for existing databases with tables that have huge amounts of data is a costly operation, and it slows down process execution since history insertion is slower.