-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(engine): Populating process instance id in jobs #4334
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
4e97dc1
af36f9b
bdde986
100fa5b
bd1c38d
c374253
3af25b9
d211061
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
*/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
package org.camunda.bpm.engine.test.api.history; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@@ -147,6 +148,19 @@ public void removeBatches() { | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ClockUtil.reset(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
@Test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
public void shouldCreateProcessInstanceRelatedBatchJobsForSingleInvocations(){ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Batch batch = historyService.deleteHistoricDecisionInstancesAsync(decisionInstanceIds, null); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
helper.executeSeedJob(batch); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
//then | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
//Making sure that processInstanceId is set in execution jobs #4205 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
assertThat(helper.getExecutionJobs(batch)) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.extracting("processInstanceId") | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder(decisionInstanceIds.toArray()); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+151
to
+163
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❌ The processInstanceId should not be populated for this type of a batch. It is incorrect to store the decision ids as process instance ids.
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
@Test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
public void createBatchDeletionByIds() { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ | |||||
*/ | ||||||
package org.camunda.bpm.engine.test.api.history; | ||||||
|
||||||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat; | ||||||
|
||||||
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy; | ||||||
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.anyOf; | ||||||
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.not; | ||||||
|
@@ -109,6 +111,21 @@ public void testDeleteHistoryProcessInstancesAsyncWithList() throws Exception { | |||||
assertAllHistoricProcessInstancesAreDeleted(); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
@Test | ||||||
public void testDeleteHistoryProcessInstances_shouldCreateProcessInstanceRelatedBatchJobsForSingleInvocations() { | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 🔧 Better
Suggested change
|
||||||
//when | ||||||
Batch batch = historyService.deleteHistoricProcessInstancesAsync(historicProcessInstances, TEST_REASON); | ||||||
|
||||||
completeSeedJobs(batch); | ||||||
List<Job> executionJobs = managementService.createJobQuery().jobDefinitionId(batch.getBatchJobDefinitionId()).list(); | ||||||
|
||||||
// then | ||||||
//Making sure that processInstanceId is set in execution jobs #4205 | ||||||
assertThat(executionJobs) | ||||||
.extracting("processInstanceId") | ||||||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder(historicProcessInstances.toArray()); | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
@Test | ||||||
public void testDeleteHistoryProcessInstancesAsyncWithListForDeletedDeployment() throws Exception { | ||||||
// given a second deployment | ||||||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -420,6 +420,34 @@ public void shouldSetRemovalTimeForBatch_MultipleInvocationsPerBatchJob() { | |||||||||||
assertThat(historicBatches.get(1).getRemovalTime()).isEqualTo(REMOVAL_TIME); | ||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
@Test | ||||||||||||
public void testRemovalTimeProcess_shouldCreateProcessInstanceRelatedBatchJobsForSingleInvocations() { | ||||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||||
testRule.getProcessEngineConfiguration().setInvocationsPerBatchJob(1); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
String processInstanceIdOne = testRule.process().userTask().deploy().start(); | ||||||||||||
String processInstanceIdTwo = testRule.process().userTask().deploy().start(); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
// when | ||||||||||||
HistoricProcessInstanceQuery query = historyService.createHistoricProcessInstanceQuery(); | ||||||||||||
Batch batch = historyService.setRemovalTimeToHistoricProcessInstances() | ||||||||||||
.absoluteRemovalTime(REMOVAL_TIME) | ||||||||||||
.byQuery(query) | ||||||||||||
.executeAsync(); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
testRule.executeSeedJobs(batch); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
// then | ||||||||||||
//Making sure that processInstanceId is set in execution jobs #4205 | ||||||||||||
List<Job> executionJobs = testRule.getExecutionJobs(batch); | ||||||||||||
assertThat(executionJobs) | ||||||||||||
.extracting("processInstanceId") | ||||||||||||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder(processInstanceIdOne, processInstanceIdTwo); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
// clear | ||||||||||||
managementService.deleteBatch(batch.getId(), true); | ||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
@Test | ||||||||||||
public void shouldSetRemovalTime_SingleInvocationPerBatchJob() { | ||||||||||||
// given | ||||||||||||
|
@@ -2835,6 +2863,9 @@ public void shouldSetExecutionStartTimeInBatchAndHistoryForDecisions() { | |||||||||||
.putValue("temperature", 32) | ||||||||||||
.putValue("dayType", "Weekend") | ||||||||||||
).evaluate(); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
HistoricDecisionInstanceQuery query = historyService.createHistoricDecisionInstanceQuery(); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+2866
to
+2868
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❌ Not needed:
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||
Batch batch = historyService.setRemovalTimeToHistoricDecisionInstances() | ||||||||||||
.absoluteRemovalTime(CURRENT_DATE) | ||||||||||||
.byQuery(historyService.createHistoricDecisionInstanceQuery()) | ||||||||||||
|
@@ -2851,6 +2882,11 @@ public void shouldSetExecutionStartTimeInBatchAndHistoryForDecisions() { | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
assertThat(batch.getExecutionStartTime()).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(CURRENT_DATE); | ||||||||||||
assertThat(historicBatch.getExecutionStartTime()).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(CURRENT_DATE); | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
//Making sure that processInstanceId is set in execution jobs #4205 | ||||||||||||
assertThat(executionJobs) | ||||||||||||
.extracting("processInstanceId") | ||||||||||||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder(query.list().stream().map(HistoricDecisionInstance::getId).toArray()); | ||||||||||||
Comment on lines
+2885
to
+2889
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❌ Process instance id should not be populated for decision related batches:
Suggested change
|
||||||||||||
} | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❌ ✍️ Please check test |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ | |
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.batch.Batch; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.batch.history.HistoricBatch; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.delegate.ExecutionListener; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.history.HistoricJobLog; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.history.HistoricProcessInstanceQuery; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.impl.cfg.ProcessEngineConfigurationImpl; | ||
import org.camunda.bpm.engine.impl.cfg.multitenancy.TenantIdProvider; | ||
|
@@ -1150,6 +1151,35 @@ public void shouldSetExecutionStartTimeInBatchAndHistory() { | |
Assertions.assertThat(historicBatch.getExecutionStartTime()).isEqualToIgnoringMillis(TEST_DATE); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void shouldSetProcessInstanceAndDefinitionIdInHistoryJobLog() { | ||
// given | ||
|
||
ProcessDefinition processDefinition = testRule.deployAndGetDefinition(ProcessModels.TWO_TASKS_PROCESS); | ||
ProcessInstance processInstance = runtimeService.createProcessInstanceById(processDefinition.getId()) | ||
.startBeforeActivity("userTask1") | ||
.execute(); | ||
runtimeService.deleteProcessInstance(processInstance.getId(), "test"); | ||
Batch batch = runtimeService.restartProcessInstances(processDefinition.getId()) | ||
.startAfterActivity("userTask2") | ||
.processInstanceIds(processInstance.getId()) | ||
.executeAsync(); | ||
helper.executeSeedJob(batch); | ||
|
||
Job executionJob = helper.getExecutionJobs(batch).get(0); | ||
assertEquals(processInstance.getProcessDefinitionId(), executionJob.getProcessDefinitionId()); | ||
assertEquals(processInstance.getRootProcessInstanceId(), executionJob.getProcessInstanceId()); | ||
|
||
yanavasileva marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
// when | ||
helper.executeJob(executionJob); | ||
|
||
// then | ||
HistoricJobLog jobLog = historyService.createHistoricJobLogQuery().jobDefinitionType(Batch.TYPE_PROCESS_INSTANCE_RESTART).list().get(0); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(processInstance.getProcessDefinitionId(), jobLog.getProcessDefinitionId()); | ||
assertEquals(processInstance.getRootProcessInstanceId(), jobLog.getProcessInstanceId()); | ||
Comment on lines
+1179
to
+1180
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ❌ The checks are performed for the historic job log, I would expect to check the jobs as well. |
||
} | ||
|
||
protected void assertBatchCreated(Batch batch, int processInstanceCount) { | ||
assertNotNull(batch); | ||
assertNotNull(batch.getId()); | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -93,6 +93,27 @@ public void testDeleteProcessInstancesAsyncWithList() throws Exception { | |||
assertProcessInstancesAreDeleted(); | ||||
} | ||||
|
||||
@Deployment(resources = { | ||||
"org/camunda/bpm/engine/test/api/oneTaskProcess.bpmn20.xml"}) | ||||
@Test | ||||
public void testDeleteProcessInstances_shouldCreateProcessInstanceRelatedBatchJobsForSingleInvocations() { | ||||
// given | ||||
List<String> processIds = startTestProcesses(2); | ||||
|
||||
// when | ||||
Batch batch = runtimeService.deleteProcessInstancesAsync(processIds, null, TESTING_INSTANCE_DELETE); | ||||
completeSeedJobs(batch); | ||||
|
||||
List<Job> executionJobs = managementService.createJobQuery().jobDefinitionId(batch.getBatchJobDefinitionId()).list(); | ||||
|
||||
// then | ||||
//Making sure that processInstanceId is set in execution jobs #4205 | ||||
assertThat(executionJobs) | ||||
.extracting("processInstanceId") | ||||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder(processIds.toArray()); | ||||
} | ||||
|
||||
|
||||
Comment on lines
+115
to
+116
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||
@Deployment(resources = { | ||||
"org/camunda/bpm/engine/test/api/oneTaskProcess.bpmn20.xml"}) | ||||
@Test | ||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note to myself: There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See: |
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note to myself:
See |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something like this will be required to avoid populating the ids for entities that are not process instance: