Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: rework on attachment azure #427

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

vrenaville
Copy link
Member

@vrenaville vrenaville commented Jun 7, 2023

Refactor for V16, more deep change bring by @#401
It permit to have a more globally configuration for azure storage indepent from object

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #427 (bb74d64) into 16.0 (d600d74) will decrease coverage by 0.54%.
The diff coverage is 38.46%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             16.0     #427      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.58%   36.05%   -0.54%     
==========================================
  Files          34       33       -1     
  Lines         768      760       -8     
  Branches      107      106       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          281      274       -7     
+ Misses        481      480       -1     
  Partials        6        6              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
attachment_azure/models/__init__.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
base_attachment_object_storage/__init__.py 42.85% <38.46%> (-57.15%) ⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@vrenaville vrenaville changed the title feat: clean version for storage feat: rework on attachment azure Jun 7, 2023
@vrenaville vrenaville merged commit 9069a09 into camptocamp:16.0 Jun 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants