Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nerve/typescript definitions #290

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BurntNerve
Copy link

No description provided.

@BurntNerve BurntNerve closed this Dec 30, 2024
@BurntNerve BurntNerve reopened this Dec 30, 2024
@2xburnt 2xburnt force-pushed the nerve/typescriptDefinitions branch from ae1a603 to 915bb5f Compare December 30, 2024 21:18
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 30, 2024

🔍 Vulnerabilities of xion:linux-amd64

📦 Image Reference xion:linux-amd64
digestsha256:6a5f5a4f4f520051798c3a48ececad9deb28defc4aa08481d61ca5c7390a739a
vulnerabilitiescritical: 3 high: 9 medium: 13 low: 2 unspecified: 1
platformlinux/amd64
size119 MB
packages345
📦 Base Image alpine:05a56cc5acbd9c9c5b7ba5ec88d866a0ddc76b586828f8288d29c57ccaa15a10
also known as
  • 3
  • 3.20
  • 3.20.3
  • latest
digestsha256:029a752048e32e843bd6defe3841186fb8d19a28dae8ec287f433bb9d6d1ad85
vulnerabilitiescritical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0
critical: 1 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/hashicorp/go-getter 1.7.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/hashicorp/[email protected]

critical 9.8: CVE--2024--3817 Improper Neutralization of Argument Delimiters in a Command ('Argument Injection')

Affected range>=1.5.9
<1.7.4
Fixed version1.7.4
CVSS Score9.8
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score0.043%
EPSS Percentile11th percentile
Description

When go-getter is performing a Git operation, go-getter will try to clone the given repository. If a Git reference is not passed along with the Git url, go-getter will then try to check the remote repository’s HEAD reference of its default branch by passing arguments to the Git binary on the host it is executing on.

An attacker may format a Git URL in order to inject additional Git arguments to the Git call.

Consumers of the go-getter library should evaluate the risk associated with these issues in the context of their go-getter usage and upgrade go-getter to 1.7.4 or later.

high 8.4: CVE--2024--6257 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Affected range<1.7.5
Fixed version1.7.5
CVSS Score8.4
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score0.043%
EPSS Percentile11th percentile
Description

HashiCorp’s go-getter library can be coerced into executing Git update on an existing maliciously modified Git Configuration, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. When go-getter is performing a Git operation, go-getter will try to clone the given repository in a specified destination. Cloning initializes a git config to the provided destination and if the repository needs to get updated go-getter will pull the new changes .

An attacker may alter the Git config after the cloning step to set an arbitrary Git configuration to achieve code execution.

critical: 1 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 golang.org/x/crypto 0.11.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

critical 9.1: CVE--2024--45337 Improper Authorization

Affected range<0.31.0
Fixed version0.31.0
CVSS Score9.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.045%
EPSS Percentile18th percentile
Description

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/[email protected] enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

medium 5.9: CVE--2023--48795 Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

Affected range<0.17.0
Fixed version0.17.0
CVSS Score5.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score94.860%
EPSS Percentile99th percentile
Description

Summary

Terrapin is a prefix truncation attack targeting the SSH protocol. More precisely, Terrapin breaks the integrity of SSH's secure channel. By carefully adjusting the sequence numbers during the handshake, an attacker can remove an arbitrary amount of messages sent by the client or server at the beginning of the secure channel without the client or server noticing it.

Mitigations

To mitigate this protocol vulnerability, OpenSSH suggested a so-called "strict kex" which alters the SSH handshake to ensure a Man-in-the-Middle attacker cannot introduce unauthenticated messages as well as convey sequence number manipulation across handshakes.

Warning: To take effect, both the client and server must support this countermeasure.

As a stop-gap measure, peers may also (temporarily) disable the affected algorithms and use unaffected alternatives like AES-GCM instead until patches are available.

Details

The SSH specifications of ChaCha20-Poly1305 ([email protected]) and Encrypt-then-MAC (*[email protected] MACs) are vulnerable against an arbitrary prefix truncation attack (a.k.a. Terrapin attack). This allows for an extension negotiation downgrade by stripping the SSH_MSG_EXT_INFO sent after the first message after SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS, downgrading security, and disabling attack countermeasures in some versions of OpenSSH. When targeting Encrypt-then-MAC, this attack requires the use of a CBC cipher to be practically exploitable due to the internal workings of the cipher mode. Additionally, this novel attack technique can be used to exploit previously unexploitable implementation flaws in a Man-in-the-Middle scenario.

The attack works by an attacker injecting an arbitrary number of SSH_MSG_IGNORE messages during the initial key exchange and consequently removing the same number of messages just after the initial key exchange has concluded. This is possible due to missing authentication of the excess SSH_MSG_IGNORE messages and the fact that the implicit sequence numbers used within the SSH protocol are only checked after the initial key exchange.

In the case of ChaCha20-Poly1305, the attack is guaranteed to work on every connection as this cipher does not maintain an internal state other than the message's sequence number. In the case of Encrypt-Then-MAC, practical exploitation requires the use of a CBC cipher; while theoretical integrity is broken for all ciphers when using this mode, message processing will fail at the application layer for CTR and stream ciphers.

For more details see https://terrapin-attack.com.

Impact

This attack targets the specification of ChaCha20-Poly1305 ([email protected]) and Encrypt-then-MAC (*[email protected]), which are widely adopted by well-known SSH implementations and can be considered de-facto standard. These algorithms can be practically exploited; however, in the case of Encrypt-Then-MAC, we additionally require the use of a CBC cipher. As a consequence, this attack works against all well-behaving SSH implementations supporting either of those algorithms and can be used to downgrade (but not fully strip) connection security in case SSH extension negotiation (RFC8308) is supported. The attack may also enable attackers to exploit certain implementation flaws in a man-in-the-middle (MitM) scenario.

critical: 1 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 0 golang.org/x/crypto 0.27.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

critical 9.1: CVE--2024--45337 Improper Authorization

Affected range<0.31.0
Fixed version0.31.0
CVSS Score9.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score0.045%
EPSS Percentile18th percentile
Description

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/[email protected] enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

critical: 0 high: 2 medium: 3 low: 0 golang.org/x/net 0.12.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

high 8.7: CVE--2024--45338 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Affected range<0.33.0
Fixed version0.33.0
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS Score0.045%
EPSS Percentile17th percentile
Description

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

high 7.5: CVE--2023--39325 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.17.0
Fixed version0.17.0
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score0.490%
EPSS Percentile76th percentile
Description

A malicious HTTP/2 client which rapidly creates requests and immediately resets them can cause excessive server resource consumption. While the total number of requests is bounded by the http2.Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting, resetting an in-progress request allows the attacker to create a new request while the existing one is still executing.

With the fix applied, HTTP/2 servers now bound the number of simultaneously executing handler goroutines to the stream concurrency limit (MaxConcurrentStreams). New requests arriving when at the limit (which can only happen after the client has reset an existing, in-flight request) will be queued until a handler exits. If the request queue grows too large, the server will terminate the connection.

This issue is also fixed in golang.org/x/net/http2 for users manually configuring HTTP/2.

The default stream concurrency limit is 250 streams (requests) per HTTP/2 connection. This value may be adjusted using the golang.org/x/net/http2 package; see the Server.MaxConcurrentStreams setting and the ConfigureServer function.

medium 6.9: CVE--2023--44487 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.17.0
Fixed version0.17.0
CVSS Score6.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS Score80.090%
EPSS Percentile99th percentile
Description

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack

The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RST_STREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RST_STREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RST_STREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RST_STREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory

swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

medium 6.1: CVE--2023--3978 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Affected range<0.13.0
Fixed version0.13.0
CVSS Score6.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score0.079%
EPSS Percentile36th percentile
Description

Text nodes not in the HTML namespace are incorrectly literally rendered, causing text which should be escaped to not be. This could lead to an XSS attack.

medium 5.3: CVE--2023--45288 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.23.0
Fixed version0.23.0
CVSS Score5.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
EPSS Score0.044%
EPSS Percentile15th percentile
Description

An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames. Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a request's headers exceed MaxHeaderBytes, no memory is allocated to store the excess headers, but they are still parsed. This permits an attacker to cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data, all associated with a request which is going to be rejected. These headers can include Huffman-encoded data which is significantly more expensive for the receiver to decode than for an attacker to send. The fix sets a limit on the amount of excess header frames we will process before closing a connection.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 3 low: 1 unspecified: 1github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk 0.46.0-beta2.0.20230614103911-b3da8bb4e801 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/cosmos/[email protected]

high 8.7: GHSA--8wcc--m6j2--qxvm Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.47.15
Fixed version0.47.15
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description

Summary

ASA-2024-0012

Name: ASA-2024-0012, Transaction decoding may result in a stack overflow
Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: cosmos-sdk versions <= v0.50.10, <= v0.47.14
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators, node operators

ASA-2024-0013

Name: ASA-2024-0013: CosmosSDK: Transaction decoding may result in resource exhaustion
Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: cosmos-sdk versions <= v0.50.10, <= v0.47.14
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators, node operators

Impact

ASA-2024-0012

When decoding a maliciously formed packet with a deeply-nested structure, it may be possible for a stack overflow to occur and result in a network halt. This was addressed by adding a recursion limit while decoding the packet.

ASA-2024-0013

Nested messages in a transaction can consume exponential cpu and memory on UnpackAny calls. Themax_tx_bytes sets a limit for external TX but is not applied for internal messages emitted by wasm contracts or a malicious validator block. This may result in a node crashing due to resource exhaustion. This was addressed by adding additional validation to prevent this condition.

Patches

The issues above are resolved in Cosmos SDK versions v0.47.15 or v0.50.11.
Please upgrade ASAP.

Timeline for ASA-2024-0012

  • October 1, 2024, 12:29pm UTC: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 1, 2024, 2:47pm UTC: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • December 9, 2024, 11:13am UTC: Core team completes patch for issue
  • Dec 14, 2024,16:00 UTC: Pre-notification delivered
  • Dec 16, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Patch made available

This issue was reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 1, 2024.

Timeline for ASA-2024-0013

  • October 19, 2024, 8:12pm UTC: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 19, 2024, 8:28pm UTC: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • December 11, 2024, 3:31pm UTC: Core team completes patch for issue
  • Dec 14, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Pre-notification delivered
  • Dec 16, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Patch made available

This issue was reported by LonelySloth to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 19, 2024.

If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

If you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [email protected]. For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.

medium 6.5: GHSA--4j93--fm92--rp4m Improper Input Validation

Affected range<=0.47.8
Fixed version0.47.9
CVSS Score6.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

ASA-2024-003: Missing BlockedAddressed Validation in Vesting Module

Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: Low
Affected Versions: Cosmos SDK versions <= 0.50.3; <= 0.47.8
Affected Users: Chain developers, Validator and Node operators
Impact: Denial of Service

Description

A vulnerability was identified in the x/auth/vesting module, which can allow a user to create a periodic vesting account on a blocked address, for example a non-initialized module account. Additional validation was added to prevent creation of a periodic vesting account in this scenario.

If this case is triggered, there is the potential for a chain halt if the uninitialized account in question is called by GetModuleAccount in Begin/EndBlock of a module. This combination of an uninitialized blocked module account is not common.

Next Steps for Impacted Parties

If your chain has uninitialized blocked module accounts, it is recommended to proactively initialize them, as they are often initialized during a chain migration or during init genesis.

If you are a chain developer on an affected version of the Cosmos SDK, it is advised to update to the latest available version of the Cosmos SDK for your project. Once a patched version is available, it is recommended that network operators upgrade.

A Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the Cosmos-SDK repository. For more information about Cosmos SDK, see https://docs.cosmos.network/.

This issue was found by Dongsam who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on January 30, 2024. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

Addendum

A variant trigger of this issue via the x/authz and x/feegrant modules was discovered by Richie who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on April 6th, 2024, and was subsequently fixed by the Cosmos SDK team on April 21st, 2024. The guidance for mitigating this additional variant is the same as the parent advisory, so it is suggested that all chains proactively initialize module accounts if they have not already done so.

medium 5.3: GHSA--2557--x9mg--76w8 Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input

Affected range<=0.47.8
Fixed version0.47.9
CVSS Score5.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

ASA-2024-002: Default PrepareProposalHandler may produce invalid proposals when used with default SenderNonceMempool

Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: Medium
Affected Versions: Cosmos SDK versions <= 0.50.3; <= 0.47.8
Affected Users: Chain developers, Validator and Node operators
Impact: Denial of Service

Summary

When using the default PrepareProposalHandler and the default SenderNonceMempool, an issue was identified which may allow invalid blocks to be proposed when a single sender includes multiple transactions with non-sequential sequence numbers in certain conditions. If this state is reached, it can lead to a reduction in block production for a network.

Next Steps for Impacted Parties

If you are a chain developer on an affected version of the Cosmos SDK, it is advised to update to the latest available version of the Cosmos SDK for your project. Once a patched version is available, it is recommended that network operators upgrade.

A Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the Cosmos-SDK repository. For more information about Cosmos SDK, see https://docs.cosmos.network/.

This issue was found by KonradStaniec, gitferry, SebastianElvis, and vitsalis who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on January 16, 2024. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

medium : GHSA--23px--mw2p--46qm

Affected range<0.46
Fixed version0.46
Description

Component: Cosmovisor
Criticality: Medium
Affected Versions: Cosmovisor < v1.0.0 (distributed with Cosmos-SDK < 0.46)
Affected Users: Validators and Node operators utilizing unsupported versions of Cosmovisor
Impact: DOS, potential RCE on node depending on configuration

An issue has been identified on unsupported versions of Cosmovisor which may result in a Denial of Service or Remote Code Execution path depending on configuration for a node or validator using the vulnerable version to manage their node.

If a validator is utilizing an affected version of Cosmovisor with DAEMON_ALLOW_DOWNLOAD_BINARIES set to true, a non-default configuration, it may be possible for an attacker to trigger a Remote Code Execution path as well on the host. In this configuration it is recommended to immediately stop use of the DAEMON_ALLOW_DOWNLOAD_BINARIES feature, and then proceed with an upgrade of Cosmovisor.

It is recommended that all validators utilizing unsupported versions of Cosmovisor to upgrade to the latest supported versions immediately. If you are utilizing a forked version of Cosmos-SDK, it is recommended to stop use of Cosmovisor until it is possible to update to a supported version of Cosmovisor, whether through your project’s fork, or directly compiled from the Cosmos-SDK. At the time of this advisory, the latest version of Cosmovisor is v1.5.0.

Additionally, the Amulet team recommends that developers building chains powered by Cosmos-SDK share this advisory with validators and node operators to ensure this information is available to all impacted parties within their ecosystems.

For more information about Cosmovisor, see https://docs.cosmos.network/main/tooling/cosmovisor

This issue was discovered by Maxwell Dulin and Nathan Kirkland, who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

How to tell if I am affected?

Running the following command will output whether your cosmovisor version is vulnerable to this issue or not.

Vulnerable to this issue:

strings ./cosmovisor | grep -q "NEEDED at" && echo "vulnerable" || echo "NOT vulnerable"

vulnerable

NOT vulnerable to this issue:

strings ./cosmovisor_new | grep -q "NEEDED at" && echo "vulnerable" || echo "NOT vulnerable"

NOT vulnerable

A Note from Amulet on the Security Advisory Process

In the interest of timely resolution of this issue for validators and node operators, the Amulet team has chosen to use existing processes and resources for distributing security advisories within the Cosmos and Interchain Ecosystems. Stay tuned as we implement an improved, more robust security advisory distribution system that will provide equitable access to information about security issues in the Interchain Stack.

low : GHSA--86h5--xcpx--cfqc Incomplete Internal State Distinction

Affected range<=0.47.9
Fixed version0.47.10
Description

ASA-2024-005: Potential slashing evasion during re-delegation

Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: Low
Affected Versions: Cosmos SDK versions <= 0.50.4; <= 0.47.9
Affected Users: Chain developers, Validator and Node operators
Impact: Slashing Evasion

Summary

An issue was identified in the slashing mechanism that may allow for the evasion of slashing penalties during a slashing event. If a delegation contributed to byzantine behavior of a validator, and the validator has not yet been slashed, it may be possible for that delegation to evade a pending slashing penalty through re-delegation behavior. Additional validation logic was added to restrict this behavior.

Next Steps for Impacted Parties

If you are a chain developer on an affected version of the Cosmos SDK, it is advised to update to the latest available version of the Cosmos SDK for your project. Once a patched version is available, it is recommended that network operators upgrade.

A Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the Cosmos-SDK repository. For more information about Cosmos SDK, see https://docs.cosmos.network/.

This issue was found by cat shark (Khanh) who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on December 6, 2023. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

unspecified : GHSA--j2cr--jc39--wpx5

Affected range<0.46.13
Fixed version0.46.13
Description

The cosmos-sdk module is affected by the vulnerability codenamed "Barberry".

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 1 low: 0 google.golang.org/grpc 1.56.2 (golang)

pkg:golang/google.golang.org/[email protected]

high 7.5: GHSA--m425--mq94--257g

Affected range<1.56.3
Fixed version1.56.3
CVSS Score7.5
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Impact

In affected releases of gRPC-Go, it is possible for an attacker to send HTTP/2 requests, cancel them, and send subsequent requests, which is valid by the HTTP/2 protocol, but would cause the gRPC-Go server to launch more concurrent method handlers than the configured maximum stream limit.

Patches

This vulnerability was addressed by #6703 and has been included in patch releases: 1.56.3, 1.57.1, 1.58.3. It is also included in the latest release, 1.59.0.

Along with applying the patch, users should also ensure they are using the grpc.MaxConcurrentStreams server option to apply a limit to the server's resources used for any single connection.

Workarounds

None.

References

#6703

medium 6.9: CVE--2023--44487 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<1.56.3
Fixed version1.56.3
CVSS Score6.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS Score80.090%
EPSS Percentile99th percentile
Description

HTTP/2 Rapid reset attack

The HTTP/2 protocol allows clients to indicate to the server that a previous stream should be canceled by sending a RST_STREAM frame. The protocol does not require the client and server to coordinate the cancellation in any way, the client may do it unilaterally. The client may also assume that the cancellation will take effect immediately when the server receives the RST_STREAM frame, before any other data from that TCP connection is processed.

Abuse of this feature is called a Rapid Reset attack because it relies on the ability for an endpoint to send a RST_STREAM frame immediately after sending a request frame, which makes the other endpoint start working and then rapidly resets the request. The request is canceled, but leaves the HTTP/2 connection open.

The HTTP/2 Rapid Reset attack built on this capability is simple: The client opens a large number of streams at once as in the standard HTTP/2 attack, but rather than waiting for a response to each request stream from the server or proxy, the client cancels each request immediately.

The ability to reset streams immediately allows each connection to have an indefinite number of requests in flight. By explicitly canceling the requests, the attacker never exceeds the limit on the number of concurrent open streams. The number of in-flight requests is no longer dependent on the round-trip time (RTT), but only on the available network bandwidth.

In a typical HTTP/2 server implementation, the server will still have to do significant amounts of work for canceled requests, such as allocating new stream data structures, parsing the query and doing header decompression, and mapping the URL to a resource. For reverse proxy implementations, the request may be proxied to the backend server before the RST_STREAM frame is processed. The client on the other hand paid almost no costs for sending the requests. This creates an exploitable cost asymmetry between the server and the client.

Multiple software artifacts implementing HTTP/2 are affected. This advisory was originally ingested from the swift-nio-http2 repo advisory and their original conent follows.

swift-nio-http2 specific advisory

swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial-of-service vulnerability in which a malicious client can create and then reset a large number of HTTP/2 streams in a short period of time. This causes swift-nio-http2 to commit to a large amount of expensive work which it then throws away, including creating entirely new Channels to serve the traffic. This can easily overwhelm an EventLoop and prevent it from making forward progress.

swift-nio-http2 1.28 contains a remediation for this issue that applies reset counter using a sliding window. This constrains the number of stream resets that may occur in a given window of time. Clients violating this limit will have their connections torn down. This allows clients to continue to cancel streams for legitimate reasons, while constraining malicious actors.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 cosmossdk.io/math 1.0.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/cosmossdk.io/[email protected]

high 8.7: GHSA--7225--m954--23v7 Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Affected range<=1.3.0
Fixed version1.4.0
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description

Name: ASA-2024-010: Mismatched bit-length in sdk.Int and sdk.Dec can lead to panic
Component: Cosmos SDK / Math
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: cosmossdk.io/math package versions <= math/v1.3.0
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators

Impact

The bit-length in sdk.Int and sdk.Dec are not aligned, which may present a possible panic condition when interacting with Dec types in an Int context. This issue was resolved by aligning the max size between the data types in the cosmossdk.io/math package.

This issue impacts consumers of the cosmossdk.io/math, which includes popular modules including IBC-Go and tokenfactory (permissionless). If your chain interacts with APIs in the cosmossdk.io/math package, or utilizes a module that consumes this library, it is advised to update to the latest version at the time of the patch release by updating your project's go.mod dependency for cosmossdk.io/math.

The patch can be applied without a hard-fork, and with a version bump in a chain's go.mod file like the following:

go.mod

- cosmossdk.io/math v1.3.0
+ cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0

[!NOTE]
When on a lower version than cosmossdk.io/math v1.3.0, please do a coordinated upgrade before upgrading to >= 1.3.0

Patches

The new release of cosmossdk.io/math v1.4.0 resolves this issue. Chains that utilize the cosmossdk.io/math library or modules that utilize the cosmossdk.io/math library should update to avoid this condition.

Timeline

  • October 31, 2024, 6:55pm UTC: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 31, 2024, 8:56pm UTC: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • Nov 15, 2024, 2:12am PST: Core team completes patch for issue
  • Nov 19, 2024, 8:00am PST / 16:00 GMT: Pre-notification delivered
  • Nov 20, 2024, 8:00am PST / 16:00 GMT: Patch made available

This issue was reported by LonelySloth to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 31, 2024. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

If you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [email protected]. For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 cosmossdk.io/x/tx 0.9.1 (golang)

pkg:golang/cosmossdk.io/x/[email protected]

high 8.7: GHSA--8wcc--m6j2--qxvm Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.13.7
Fixed version0.13.7
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description

Summary

ASA-2024-0012

Name: ASA-2024-0012, Transaction decoding may result in a stack overflow
Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: cosmos-sdk versions <= v0.50.10, <= v0.47.14
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators, node operators

ASA-2024-0013

Name: ASA-2024-0013: CosmosSDK: Transaction decoding may result in resource exhaustion
Component: Cosmos SDK
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: cosmos-sdk versions <= v0.50.10, <= v0.47.14
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators, node operators

Impact

ASA-2024-0012

When decoding a maliciously formed packet with a deeply-nested structure, it may be possible for a stack overflow to occur and result in a network halt. This was addressed by adding a recursion limit while decoding the packet.

ASA-2024-0013

Nested messages in a transaction can consume exponential cpu and memory on UnpackAny calls. Themax_tx_bytes sets a limit for external TX but is not applied for internal messages emitted by wasm contracts or a malicious validator block. This may result in a node crashing due to resource exhaustion. This was addressed by adding additional validation to prevent this condition.

Patches

The issues above are resolved in Cosmos SDK versions v0.47.15 or v0.50.11.
Please upgrade ASAP.

Timeline for ASA-2024-0012

  • October 1, 2024, 12:29pm UTC: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 1, 2024, 2:47pm UTC: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • December 9, 2024, 11:13am UTC: Core team completes patch for issue
  • Dec 14, 2024,16:00 UTC: Pre-notification delivered
  • Dec 16, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Patch made available

This issue was reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 1, 2024.

Timeline for ASA-2024-0013

  • October 19, 2024, 8:12pm UTC: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 19, 2024, 8:28pm UTC: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • December 11, 2024, 3:31pm UTC: Core team completes patch for issue
  • Dec 14, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Pre-notification delivered
  • Dec 16, 2024, 16:00 UTC: Patch made available

This issue was reported by LonelySloth to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 19, 2024.

If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

If you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [email protected]. For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/cometbft/cometbft 0.38.12 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/cometbft/[email protected]

high 8.3: GHSA--p7mv--53f2--4cwj Improper Validation of Array Index

Affected range>=0.38.0
<0.38.15
Fixed version0.38.15
CVSS Score8.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description

Name: ASA-2024-011: Vote Extensions: Panic when receiving a Pre-commit with an invalid data
Component: CometBFT
Criticality: High (Considerable Impact, and Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2)
Affected versions: >= 0.38.x, unreleased v1.x and main development branches
Affected users: Chain Builders + Maintainers, Validators

Impact

A CometBFT node running in a network with vote extensions enabled could produce an invalid Vote message and send it to its peers. The invalid field of the Vote message is the ValidatorIndex, which identifies the sender in the ValidatorSet running that height of consensus. This field is ordinarily verified in the processing of Vote messages, but it turns out that in the case of a Vote message of type Precommit and for a non-nil BlockID, a logic was introduced before this ordinary verification to handle the attached vote extension. This introduced logic (not present in releases prior to 0.38.x) does not double-check the validity of the ValidatorIndex field. The result is a panic in the execution of the node receiving and processing such message.

Impact Qualification

This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node sending this Vote message to its peers. Namely, nodes running upstream code cannot produce invalid Vote messages, with non-existing ValidatorIndex. Moreover, networks utilizing default behavior, where vote extensions are not enabled, are not affected by this issue.

Patches

The new CometBFT release v0.38.15 fixes this issue.

Unreleased code in the main and v1.x branches, and experimental code in the v0.38-experimental and v1.x-experimental branches are patched as well.

Workarounds

When the consensus code panics after receiving an invalid Vote message, the operator can identify the peer from which that message was received. This may require increasing the logging level of the consensus module. This peer can then be subsequently banned at the p2p layer as a temporary mitigation.

References

Timeline

  • October 21, 2024, 3:26pm PST: Issue reported to the Cosmos Bug Bounty program
  • October 21, 2024, 3:41pm PST: Issue triaged by Amulet on-call, and distributed to Core team
  • October 29, 2024, 11:35pm PST: Core team completes validation of issue
  • October 30, 2024, 3:33am PST: Core team completes patch for issue
  • October 30, 2024, 5:09am PST: Amulet creates coordination plan; schedule for distribution
  • November 4, 2024, 8:00pm GMT: Pre-notification delivered
  • November 6, 2024, 8:00am GMT: Patch made available

This issue was reported by corverroos to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne on October 21, 2024. If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

If you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [email protected]. For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.

A Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the CometBFT repository. For more information about CometBFT, see https://docs.cometbft.com/.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 golang.org/x/net 0.29.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

high 8.7: CVE--2024--45338 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Affected range<0.33.0
Fixed version0.33.0
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
EPSS Score0.045%
EPSS Percentile17th percentile
Description

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 2 low: 0 github.com/cosmwasm/wasmvm/v2 2.1.2 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/cosmwasm/[email protected]#v2

medium : GHSA--vmqh--5232--v43r

Affected range>=2.1.0
<2.1.3
Fixed version2.1.3
Description

CWA-2024-008

Severity

Medium (Moderate + Likely)1

Affected versions:

  • wasmvm >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.3
  • wasmvm >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.4
  • wasmvm < 1.5.5
  • cosmwasm-vm >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.4
  • cosmwasm-vm >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.7
  • cosmwasm-vm < 1.5.8

Patched versions:

  • wasmvm 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3
  • cosmwasm-vm 1.5.8, 2.0.7, 2.1.4

Description of the bug

(Blank for now. We'll add more detail once chains had a chance to upgrade.)

Patch

Applying the patch

The patch will be shipped in releases of wasmvm. You can update more or less as follows:

  1. Check the current wasmvm version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm
  2. Bump the github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm dependency in your go.mod to 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3 depending on which minor version you are; go mod tidy; commit.
  3. If you use the static libraries libwasmvm_muslc.aarch64.a/libwasmvm_muslc.x86_64.a, update them accordingly.
  4. Check the updated wasmvm version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm and ensure you see 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3.
  5. Follow your regular practices to deploy chain upgrades.

To double check if the correct library version is loaded at runtime, use this query:
<appd> query wasm libwasmvm-version. It must show 1.5.5, 2.0.4 or 2.1.3.

The patch is consensus breaking and requires a coordinated upgrade.

Acknowledgement

This issue was found by meadow101 who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne.

If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the
program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

Timeline

  • 2024-08-22: Confio receives a report through the Cosmos bug bounty program maintained by Amulet.
  • 2024-08-23: Confio security contributors confirm the report.
  • 2024-09-09: Confio developed the patch internally.
  • 2024-09-23: Patch is released.

medium : GHSA--2q97--m5rc--p3gp

Affected range>=2.1.0
<2.1.3
Fixed version2.1.3
Description

CWA-2024-007

Severity

Medium (Moderate + Likely)1

Affected versions:

  • wasmvm >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.3
  • wasmvm >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.4
  • wasmvm < 1.5.5
  • cosmwasm-vm >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.4
  • cosmwasm-vm >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.7
  • cosmwasm-vm < 1.5.8

Patched versions:

  • wasmvm 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3
  • cosmwasm-vm 1.5.8, 2.0.7, 2.1.4

Description of the bug

(Blank for now. We'll add more detail once chains had a chance to upgrade.)

Patch

Applying the patch

The patch will be shipped in releases of wasmvm. You can update more or less as follows:

  1. Check the current wasmvm version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm
  2. Bump the github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm dependency in your go.mod to 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3 depending on which minor version you are; go mod tidy; commit.
  3. If you use the static libraries libwasmvm_muslc.aarch64.a/libwasmvm_muslc.x86_64.a, update them accordingly.
  4. Check the updated wasmvm version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm and ensure you see 1.5.5, 2.0.4, 2.1.3.
  5. Follow your regular practices to deploy chain upgrades.

To double check if the correct library version is loaded at runtime, use this query:
<appd> query wasm libwasmvm-version. It must show 1.5.5, 2.0.4 or 2.1.3.

The patch is consensus breaking and requires a coordinated upgrade.

Acknowledgement

This issue was found by meadow101 who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne.

If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the
program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

Timeline

  • 2024-08-28: Confio receives a report through the Cosmos bug bounty program maintained by Amulet.
  • 2024-08-30: Confio security contributors confirm the report.
  • 2024-09-02: Confio developed the patch internally.
  • 2024-09-23: Patch is released.
critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 2 low: 0 github.com/dvsekhvalnov/jose2go 1.5.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/dvsekhvalnov/[email protected]

medium 5.3: GHSA--mhpq--9638--x6pw Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<1.5.1-0.20231206184617-48ba0b76bc88
Fixed version1.5.1-0.20231206184617-48ba0b76bc88
CVSS Score5.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

An attacker controlled input of a PBES2 encrypted JWE blob can have a very large p2c value that, when decrypted, produces a denial-of-service.

medium : CVE--2023--50658

Affected range<1.6.0
Fixed version1.6.0
EPSS Score0.043%
EPSS Percentile11th percentile
Description

The jose2go component before 1.6.0 for Go allows attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large p2c (aka PBES2 Count) value.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 google.golang.org/protobuf 1.31.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/google.golang.org/[email protected]

medium 6.6: CVE--2024--24786 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

Affected range<1.33.0
Fixed version1.33.0
CVSS Score6.6
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
EPSS Score0.045%
EPSS Percentile17th percentile
Description

The protojson.Unmarshal function can enter an infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON. This condition can occur when unmarshaling into a message which contains a google.protobuf.Any value, or when the UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown option is set.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 1 github.com/cosmwasm/wasmd 0.53.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/cosmwasm/[email protected]

low : GHSA--vmg2--r3xv--r3xf

Affected range<0.53.2
Fixed version0.53.2
Description

CWA-2024-009

Severity

Low (Marginal + Likely)1

Affected versions:

  • wasmd < 0.53.1

Patched versions:

  • wasmd 0.53.2 (please note that wasmd 0.53.1 is broken and must not be used)

Description of the bug

(Blank for now. We'll add more detail once chains had a chance to upgrade.)

Mitigations

Apart from upgrading, it is recommended to not open the gRPC and REST APIs of validator nodes to the public internet. Use isolated and resource-constrained environments for running separate public RPC nodes instead.
These can then easily be thrown away and replaced with new instances in case of problems.

Applying the patch

Official Wasmd patch

The patch will be shipped in a wasmd release. You will also have to update libwasmvm if you build statically.
If you already use the latest / close to latest wasmd, you can update more or less as follows:

  1. Check the current wasmd version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd
  2. Bump the github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd dependency in your go.mod to 0.53.2 (Cosmos SDK 0.50 compatible); go mod tidy; commit.
  3. If you use the static libraries libwasmvm_muslc.aarch64.a/libwasmvm_muslc.x86_64.a, make sure that you use the same version as your wasmvm version.
  4. Check the updated wasmd version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd and ensure you see 0.53.2.
  5. Follow your regular practices to deploy chain upgrades.

To double check if the correct library version is loaded at runtime, use this query:
<appd> query wasm libwasmvm-version. It must show 2.1.4.

The patch is not consensus breaking if you are already using wasmvm 2.1.3.
If you are instead using wasmvm 2.1.2, then upgrading to 2.1.4 includes the consensus breaking changes of 2.1.3.

DIY Patch

If you are unable to upgrade to the latest version, you can backport the wasmd patch to your version. The patch is available at Wasmd 0.53.2.
However, if you are on an older version of wasmd, you will also be using a different version of wasmvm. We provide the required patches for wasmvm in versions 2.1.4, 2.0.5, 1.5.6.
To upgrade using this method:

  1. Check the current wasmvm version: go list -m github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm and upgrade
    to the closest patched version.
  2. Bump the github.com/CosmWasm/wasmvm dependency in your go.mod to the closest compatible patched version (either 2.1.4, 2.0.5 or 1.5.6); go mod tidy; commit.
  3. Apply the patch linked above to your version of wasmd.
  4. If you use the static libraries libwasmvm_muslc.aarch64.a/libwasmvm_muslc.x86_64.a, make sure that you use the same version as your wasmvm version.
  5. Follow your regular practices to deploy chain upgrades.

To double check if the correct library version is loaded at runtime, use this query:
<appd> query wasm libwasmvm-version. It must show 2.1.4, 2.0.5 or 1.5.6 and must be the same as the wasmvm version in your go.sum.

The patch is not consensus breaking as long as you were using the previous patch version of wasmvm before.

Acknowledgement

This issue was found by meadow101 who reported it to the Cosmos Bug Bounty Program on HackerOne.

If you believe you have found a bug in the Interchain Stack or would like to contribute to the
program by reporting a bug, please see https://hackerone.com/cosmos.

Timeline

  • 2024-09-25: Confio receives a report through the Cosmos bug bounty program maintained by Amulet.
  • 2024-09-30: Confio security contributors confirm the report.
  • 2024-11-21: Confio developed the patch internally.
  • 2024-12-06: Patch release is pre-announced through notification lists.
  • 2024-12-10: Patch released.

Footnotes

  1. following Amulet's Severity Classification Framework ACMv1: https://github.com/interchainio/security/blob/e0227a1fb4059144aab4f6003eeee7f09912db3a/resources/CLASSIFICATION_MATRIX.md 2 3

Copy link
Contributor

@2xburnt 2xburnt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we adding this to the chain repo? wouldn't it make more sense in xion.js repo?

run: |
npm ci

- name: Generate Protobuf Definitions
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already have a script that generates protobufs, why are we forking a second process to do the same?

run: |
npm run test:compatibility

release:
Copy link
Contributor

@2xburnt 2xburnt Dec 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is happening here that hasn't already been done on line 108-125

@2xburnt 2xburnt force-pushed the nerve/typescriptDefinitions branch from 915bb5f to 82d5b69 Compare January 6, 2025 02:22
@justinbarry
Copy link
Contributor

@BurntNerve Is this redundant now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants