[CodeHealth][rust] bump tracing-subscriber 0.2 -> 0.3

[bridiver]

Resolves brave/brave-browser#44129

Submitter Checklist:

• I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed and no other type of reviews are needed, or that I have requested them
• There is a ticket for my issue
• Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
• Wrote a good PR/commit description
• Squashed any review feedback or "fixup" commits before merge, so that history is a record of what happened in the repo, not your PR
• Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
• Checked the PR locally:
  • npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests wiki
  • npm run presubmit wiki, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
• Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

• A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
• New files have MPL-2.0 license header
• Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
• Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
• Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
• Code follows the style guide
• Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

• The associated issue milestone is set to the smallest version that the
  changes has landed on
• All relevant documentation has been updated, for instance:
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Deviations-from-Chromium-(features-we-disable-or-remove)
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Proxy-redirected-URLs
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Fingerprinting-Protections
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Brave%E2%80%99s-Use-of-Referral-Codes
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/Web-Compatibility-Exceptions-in-Brave
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/QA-Guide
  • https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/wiki/P3A

Test Plan:

[github-actions]

[puLL-Merge] - brave/brave-core@27740

Here's my analysis of this pull request:

Description

This PR downloads and reverts the tracing-subscriber dependency from v0.3 to v0.2 in the Brave browser's SKUS component. The change includes downgrading several related dependencies and adding new ones to support the older version.

Possible Issues

• Downgrading to an older version of tracing-subscriber may miss out on bug fixes and improvements from v0.3
• Additional dependencies being added increase the overall package size

Security Hotspots

1. The PR notes a security vulnerability (RUSTSEC-2021-0139) related to the ansi_term crate being unmaintained, which is added as a new dependency. This should be monitored for potential security issues.

Changes

Changes

By filename:

• components/skus/browser/rs/cxx/BUILD.gn: Updates tracing-subscriber dependency from v0.3 to v0.2
• components/skus/browser/rs/cxx/Cargo.toml:
  • Downgrades tracing-subscriber to v0.2.0
  • Adds additional features requirements
• components/skus/browser/rs/cxx/src/log.rs: Updates formatting code to work with older API
• components/skus/browser/rs/lib/Cargo.toml: Adds tracing-subscriber v0.2 as dev dependency with note about security vulnerability
• Added multiple new dependency files for:
  • ansi_term v0.12
  • valuable v0.1
  • winapi v0.3

sequenceDiagram
    participant Build as Build System
    participant SKUs as SKUS Component
    participant Tracing as Tracing Subscriber
    participant Format as Log Formatter

    Build->>SKUs: Initialize
    SKUs->>Tracing: Initialize v0.2 subscriber
    Tracing->>Format: Configure formatter
    Format->>Format: Apply ANSI settings
    Format->>SKUs: Return formatted log
    SKUs->>Build: Complete initialization

Loading

[bridiver]

This PR downloads and reverts the tracing-subscriber dependency from v0.3 to v0.2 in the Brave browser's SKUS component

That's backwards

[bridiver]

Moved the whole thing into #27745