Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Uplift 1.62.x] AI Chat Mixtral fixes #21664

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

[Uplift 1.62.x] AI Chat Mixtral fixes #21664

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 21, 2024

Conversation

petemill
Copy link
Member

@petemill
ai chat: mixtral shouldn't have general seed when prompt is built (#2…
aa8b158 
…1608)

* ai chat: mixtral shouldn't have general seed

* Ai Chat: minor strings

* more page content truncation for mixtral and llama2
@petemill
AI Chat shouldn't think user is newly premium when simply retrieving …
f6f9db9 
…premium status for first time (#21655)
@petemill petemill added this to the 1.62.x - Release milestone Jan 21, 2024
@petemill petemill self-assigned this Jan 21, 2024
@petemill petemill requested a review from a team as a code owner January 21, 2024 04:55
kjozwiak
kjozwiak approved these changes Jan 21, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@kjozwiak kjozwiak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uplift into 1.62.x approved 👍 QA has verified the PR on Nightly via 1.64.x as per #21608 (comment) & #21655 (comment).

@kjozwiak kjozwiak merged commit 98497c9 into 1.62.x Jan 21, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
@kjozwiak kjozwiak deleted the ai-chat-mixtral-fixes-1.62.x branch January 21, 2024 23:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kjozwiak kjozwiak kjozwiak approved these changes

Assignees

@petemill petemill

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.62.x - Release
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@petemill @kjozwiak