More info for choosing the correct subprofile

[dagobert]

This PR contains changes to help the user to decide for a subprofile.

When having eg. a light device which exposes multiple light switches such as RGB and white, the model created needs to have sub-profiles for each one. Since it is not feasable to match the sub-profiles hard coded to the corresponding light entity the uiser needs to decide at configuration time.

When such a light is discovered by powercalc for every light entity there is a seperate item in the integration page. This item has no information that identifies it to which light entity it belongs. all of them are named the same.
When starting the configuration within flow there is still no information which entity the flow belongs to.

This PR introduces an addition to the description in the sub-profile step: It adds the entity ID of the discovery source.

This PR is related to #2978, #2986

[dagobert]

If you agree with the PR I will change the other translations.

[bramstroker]

@dagobert Yes looks fine, great contribution. I would have implemented something similar.
No need to modify the other languages, they can be translated with crowdin later on.

What is up with the 2 PNG's? profile_library/mueller-licht/404005/color_temp.png.
You commited them yesterday when you started this branch I see.
Could you please remove these?

[dagobert]

@dagobert Yes looks fine, great contribution. I would have implemented something similar. No need to modify the other languages, they can be translated with crowdin later on.

What is up with the 2 PNG's? profile_library/mueller-licht/404005/color_temp.png. You commited them yesterday when you started this branch I see. Could you please remove these?

I have no idea where they are coming from. Sorry for the mess. I have done a revert of the png commit. I think the PR is now ready for you to commit.

[bramstroker]

Let's use entity_id instead of entityid to be consistent with how it's named everywhere