Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ci(gh-action): use new action notify-slack-action #679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

ci(gh-action): use new action notify-slack-action #679

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

akantcheff
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@akantcheff akantcheff changed the title tr(gh-action): use new action notify-slack-action ci(gh-action): use new action notify-slack-action Feb 23, 2024
@akantcheff akantcheff force-pushed the tr/use-new-notify-slack-action branch from 9137eb3 to 1c17624 Compare February 23, 2024 16:22
@sonarqubecloud SonarQubeCloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

benjaminParisel
benjaminParisel approved these changes Feb 26, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👌

@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel merged commit 6564ab6 into master Feb 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel deleted the tr/use-new-notify-slack-action branch February 26, 2024 10:39
@benjaminParisel
Copy link
Contributor

Variable SLACK_CHANNEL_ID removed
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@benjaminParisel benjaminParisel benjaminParisel approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@akantcheff @benjaminParisel