Point users to discourse for new discussion/archives for old

- If we want users to participate in a conversation, link to
  https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition/
- If we want to link to historic conversations,
  link to the mailing list archives

bibliographic/index.markdown

@@ -17,5 +17,5 @@ wordpress_id: 388
 
   * [Open Bibliography Principles](http://openbiblio.net/principles/)
   * [OpenBiblio.net - Open Bibliographic Projects and Discussion and home of the Open Bibliographic Data Working Group](http://openbiblio.net/)
-  * [Open Bibliographic Data mailing list](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography)
+  * [Open Bibliographic Data mailing list](https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/)
 

contact/index.markdown

@@ -8,9 +8,6 @@ title: 'Contact '
 wordpress_id: 242
 ---
 
-* Email: opendefinition [at] okfn [dot] org
-* Forum: <https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition>
-
-If you have any questions, comments or suggestions about the Open Definition, please contact us. You can do so either by sending and email or writing on the forum.
+If you have any questions, comments or suggestions about the Open Definition, please contact us via [the forum](https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition).
 
 We aim to translate the Definition into many other languages. If you would like to help out with [translating](/participate/) the Definition into a language not already listed, please get in touch either via email or on the forum.

government/index.markdown

@@ -17,4 +17,4 @@ wordpress_id: 264
 
   * [Open Government Data website](http://opengovernmentdata.org/)
   * [Open Knowledge Foundation Working Group on Open Government Data](http://wiki.okfn.org/wg/government)
-  * [Open Government (open-government) mailing list](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government)
+  * [Open Government (open-government) mailing list](https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/)

licenses/process/index.markdown

@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ To do this:
 ## What Will Happen
 
 1. After submission, the Open Definition community will discuss on the forum and reach consensus.
-2. The Open Definition Advisory Council chair will summarize the consensus to the Advisory Council on the forum and to other relevant venues, [okfn-discuss](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss) at a minimum.
+2. The Open Definition Advisory Council chair will summarize the consensus to the Advisory Council on the forum and to other relevant venues, [Open Definition forum](https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition/) at a minimum.
 3. If over next two weeks issues are raised which indicate a different consensus or further discussion needed, chair will step process back to first or second step as appropriate. Otherwise, chair calls for formal approval of consensus by Advisory Council.
-4. If after two weeks at least three Advisory Council members approve the consensus summary on theforum, and at least 75% of Advisory Council members expressing an opinion on the summary if any dissent, the website will be updated, and announcements made to public, submitter, and wider lists as appropriate.  Wider lists includes the [email protected] and [email protected] lists.
+4. If after two weeks at least three Advisory Council members approve the consensus summary on theforum, and at least 75% of Advisory Council members expressing an opinion on the summary if any dissent, the website will be updated, and announcements made to public, submitter, and wider forums as appropriate.
 
 This process will also apply to acceptance of new versions of the Open
 Definition itself.

ossd/index.markdown

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ An open software service is one:
 
 ### Acknowledgements
 
-This definition was originally drafted thanks on the [open definition discussiong mailing list](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss). A variety of people contributed to that effort as well as subsequent improvements and amendments including (in alphabetical order):
+This definition was originally drafted thanks on the [open definition discussiong mailing list](https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/). A variety of people contributed to that effort as well as subsequent improvements and amendments including (in alphabetical order):
 
 * Dave Crossland
 * Francis Irving
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ welcome to [this topic](http://rizzoma.com/topic/a5a8bfa0ced5ab2611cf5e365673a55
 * v0.2: (first version on this site): 2007-07
 * v0.1: 2006-10
 
-This particular formulation originates from discussions taking place originally on the [okfn-discuss mailing list](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss) in September and October 2006 (see in particular [this post](https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2006-October/000177.html)) but owes much to [more recent (Summer 2007) discussions](https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2007-July/000475.html) precipitated by activities at GUADEC 2007 (see [1], [2], [3], [4]).
+This particular formulation originates from discussions taking place originally on the [okfn-discuss mailing list](https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/) in September and October 2006 (see in particular [this post](https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2006-October/000177.html)) but owes much to [more recent (Summer 2007) discussions](https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/2007-July/000475.html) precipitated by activities at GUADEC 2007 (see [1], [2], [3], [4]).
 
 1. [We Need an Open Service Definition](https://blog.okfn.org/2007/07/18/we-need-an-open-service-definition/) -- blog post on the OKFN blog by Francis Irving which references [a post on Havoc Pennington's blog](http://log.ometer.com/2007-07.html#18)
 2. [Evaluating a Free/Open Service Definition (rough draft)](http://tieguy.org/blog/2007/07/22/evaluating-a-freeopen-service-definition-rough-draft/) posted by Luis Villa

participate/index.markdown

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: page
 title: Participate
 ---
 
-The work of the Open Definition project is done in an open manner and everyone is welcome to participate. Conversations are encouraged on the [Open Knowledge Forum](https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition). (Old discussions have previously taken place on the [od-discuss mailing list](https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss)).
+The work of the Open Definition project is done in an open manner and everyone is welcome to participate. Conversations are encouraged on the [Open Knowledge Forum](https://discuss.okfn.org/c/projects/OpenDefinition). (Old discussions have previously taken place on the [od-discuss mailing list](https://lists-archive.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/)).
 
 Also see our [issue tracker](https://github.com/okfn/opendefinition/issues) and [blog](/update/) for other opportunites.
 

source/open-definition-revision-process-dev.markdown

@@ -16,5 +16,4 @@ Definition Revision Approval Process _- draft_
 
 7. Chair calls for formal approval of release candidate by Advisory Council on the forum.
 
-8. If after two weeks at least three Advisory Council members approve the consensus summary on the forum, and at least 75% of Advisory Council members expressing an opinion on the summary if any dissent, the website will be updated, and announcements made to public and wider lists as appropriate. Wider lists includes the [email protected] and [email protected] lists.  If the motion does not pass the chair notifies the list and steps the process back to step 2.
-
+8. If after two weeks at least three Advisory Council members approve the consensus summary on the forum, and at least 75% of Advisory Council members expressing an opinion on the summary if any dissent, the website will be updated, and announcements made to public and wider forums as appropriate. If the motion does not pass the chair notifies the list and steps the process back to step 2.