Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjusted MCLMC #675

Open
wants to merge 107 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

reubenharry
Copy link
Contributor

@reubenharry reubenharry commented May 15, 2024

A change is also made to partially_refresh_momentum, which allows (adjusted) MCHMC to be the limit of MCLMC with infinite $L$. This is convenient since the user may or not want partial refreshment (in the unadjusted case, we find that it is always beneficial, but don't know yet in the adjusted case)

Addresses #676.

Checklist:

  • If I add a new sampler, there is an issue discussing it already;
  • We should be able to understand what the PR does from its title only;
  • There is a high-level description of the changes;
  • There are links to all the relevant issues, discussions and PRs;
  • The branch is rebased on the latest main commit;
  • Commit messages follow these guidelines;
  • The code respects the current naming conventions;
  • Docstrings follow the numpy style guide
  • pre-commit is installed and configured on your machine, and you ran it before opening the PR;
  • There are tests covering the changes;
  • The doc is up-to-date;
  • If I add a new sampler* I added/updated related examples

@reubenharry reubenharry marked this pull request as draft May 27, 2024 16:41
@reubenharry reubenharry marked this pull request as ready for review May 27, 2024 16:52
blackjax/adaptation/mclmc_adaptation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blackjax/adaptation/window_adaptation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
blackjax/adaptation/mclmc_adaptation.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@reubenharry
Copy link
Contributor Author

reubenharry commented Jun 10, 2024

I think this is ready to review again @junpenglao

EDIT: actually, let me first update the tuning algorithm.

@reubenharry reubenharry marked this pull request as draft June 11, 2024 14:52
@junpenglao junpenglao marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2024 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants