-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 646
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Polish BSIP40 with latest change requests #2203
base: release
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
See https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r399386266
See https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401052309 A compile error is now thrown if any operation field type is unsupported in use in any predicate with any argument type. See https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r400286103 Unsigned_int is now supported as an integral type
See bitshares#2093 (comment) Add a cmake template file for the list_#.cpp files and autogenerate them from the template rather than having 12 almost identical copies of a file
See https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r400317820
See: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401581235 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401581502 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401582839 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401583091 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401588755
See: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401599873
See: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401604111 I can still get away with reordering the list like this because it's never been released yet.
Now allows ==, !=, <, <=, >, >= for stringish types (including hashes and vector<char>s), container size vs int, and static_variant.which() values vs int. vector<char> is no longer considered a container, but is considered stringish See: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401604111 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401635775 https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-core/pull/ 2093#discussion_r401642590
Add support for innteger comparisons against a stringish that is not a container, necessary because vector<char> is no longer a container but only stringish.
/* 7 */ fc::sha256, \ | ||
/* 8 */ fc::ripemd160, \ | ||
/* 9 */ fc::hash160, \ | ||
/* 10 */ account_id_type, \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately the reordering breaks the public testnet.
[54, {"fee"=>{"amount"=>300000, "asset_id"=>"1.3.0"}, "account"=>"1.2.24713", "enabled"=>true, "valid_from"=>"2019-11-15T00:00:00", "valid_to"=>"2019-11-30T00:00:00", "operation_type"=>0, "auth"=>{"weight_threshold"=>1, "account_auths"=>[["1.2.24713", 1]], "key_auths"=>[], "address_auths"=>[]}, "restrictions"=>[{"member_index"=>2, "restriction_type"=>0, "argument"=>[7, "1.2.23833"], "extensions"=>[]}], "extensions"=>[]}]
[55, {"fee"=>{"amount"=>230000, "asset_id"=>"1.3.0"}, "account"=>"1.2.24713", "authority_to_update"=>"1.17.0", "new_auth"=>{"weight_threshold"=>1, "account_auths"=>[["1.2.24714", 1]], "key_auths"=>[], "address_auths"=>[]}, "restrictions_to_remove"=>[], "restrictions_to_add"=>[], "extensions"=>[]}]
[54, {"fee"=>{"amount"=>330000, "asset_id"=>"1.3.0"}, "account"=>"1.2.24713", "enabled"=>true, "valid_from"=>"2019-11-15T00:00:00", "valid_to"=>"2019-11-30T00:00:00", "operation_type"=>1, "auth"=>{"weight_threshold"=>1, "account_auths"=>[["1.2.24713", 1]], "key_auths"=>[], "address_auths"=>[]}, "restrictions"=>[{"member_index"=>2, "restriction_type"=>10, "argument"=>[39, [{"member_index"=>1, "restriction_type"=>0, "argument"=>[8, "1.3.0"], "extensions"=>[]}]], "extensions"=>[]}], "extensions"=>[]}]
[55, {"fee"=>{"amount"=>230000, "asset_id"=>"1.3.0"}, "account"=>"1.2.24713", "authority_to_update"=>"1.17.1", "new_auth"=>{"weight_threshold"=>1, "account_auths"=>[["1.2.24714", 1]], "key_auths"=>[], "address_auths"=>[]}, "restrictions_to_remove"=>[], "restrictions_to_add"=>[], "extensions"=>[]}]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ahh? I didn't realize this had been released, much less used. The fix is just to move the new hash types to the bottom of the list, no?
This addresses abit's change requests wrt BSIP40 in #2093