Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing base component inheritance to BitMessageBox (#9666) #9667

Conversation

Cyrus-Sushiant
Copy link
Member

@Cyrus-Sushiant Cyrus-Sushiant commented Jan 14, 2025

This closes #9666

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced BitMessageBox component with improved styling and attribute management
    • Added more dynamic customization options for message box appearance
  • Refactor

    • Updated component inheritance to use BitComponentBase
    • Implemented new methods for CSS class and style registration

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the BitMessageBox component in both its Razor markup and code-behind files to inherit from BitComponentBase. This change introduces new capabilities for dynamic styling and attribute management through the addition of StyleBuilder, ClassBuilder, and enhanced attribute handling. The modifications maintain the existing message box functionality while providing more flexibility in component configuration and styling.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/BlazorUI/.../BitMessageBox.razor - Added @inherits BitComponentBase
- Enhanced root <div> with new attributes like @ref, @attributes, id, style, class
- Added dynamic dir attribute setting
src/BlazorUI/.../BitMessageBox.razor.cs - Updated class inheritance to BitComponentBase
- Added RootElementClass property
- Implemented RegisterCssClasses() and RegisterCssStyles() methods

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Inherit BitMessageBox from BitComponentBase [#9666]

Poem

🐰 A message box, now with grace and might,
Inheriting base classes, shining bright!
Styles and classes, dancing with glee,
A component reborn, as flexible as can be!
Hop, hop, hooray for code so clean! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor (1)

Line range hint 10-45: Consider using StyleBuilder and ClassBuilder consistently throughout the component.

Currently, there's a mix of styling approaches:

  • Root element uses StyleBuilder.Value and ClassBuilder.Value
  • Inner elements use direct style/class bindings (e.g., style="@Styles?.Container")

For consistency and better maintainability, consider using the builder pattern throughout the component.

src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor.cs (4)

Line range hint 1-1: Remove unused import.

The System.Reflection.Metadata import appears to be unused and can be removed.


44-52: Consider registering styles for all component parts.

The current implementation only registers root-level styles and classes. Consider registering styles for other parts of the component (container, header, body, footer) to fully utilize the builder pattern.


54-55: Remove extra blank lines.

Multiple consecutive blank lines can be reduced to one.


Line range hint 57-66: Consider consolidating duplicate event handlers.

Both CloseModal and OnOkClick methods have identical implementations. Consider consolidating them into a single method or clarifying their distinct purposes if they're intended to handle different scenarios.

-    private async Task CloseModal()
-    {
-        await OnClose.InvokeAsync();
-    }
-
-    private async Task OnOkClick()
-    {
-        await OnClose.InvokeAsync();
-    }
+    private Task CloseModal() => OnClose.InvokeAsync();
+
+    // If these methods might have different behavior in the future,
+    // consider keeping them separate but add a comment explaining the intention
+    private Task OnOkClick() => CloseModal();
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 606d220 and c5062b0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor (1 hunks)
  • src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor.cs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build and test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor (1)

2-9: LGTM! Inheritance implementation looks correct.

The component now properly inherits from BitComponentBase and correctly implements all the necessary attributes (RootElement, HtmlAttributes, StyleBuilder, ClassBuilder) required for the base component's functionality.

Let's verify the BitComponentBase implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Inheritance implementation verified and consistent with codebase patterns

The BitMessageBox component correctly inherits from BitComponentBase, following the same pattern used by 50+ other components across the codebase, including other components in the Bit.BlazorUI.Extras package. The implementation includes all required base attributes and is consistent with the framework's architecture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if BitComponentBase is properly implemented across other components
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ : BitComponentBase {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 176


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find BitComponentBase definition
rg "class BitComponentBase" -A 5

# Find Razor components inheriting from BitComponentBase
rg "@inherits BitComponentBase" --type razor

Length of output: 646


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find Razor components inheriting from BitComponentBase using file extension
rg "@inherits BitComponentBase" "*.razor"

# Alternative search to find all .razor files
fd ".razor$" --exec grep -l "BitComponentBase" {} \;

Length of output: 4449

src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI.Extras/Components/MessageBox/BitMessageBox.razor.cs (1)

42-42: LGTM! Root element class is properly defined.

The RootElementClass override correctly defines the base class for the message box component.

@msynk msynk changed the title Fix inherit issue in BitMessageBox (#9666) Add missing base component inheritance to BitMessageBox (#9666) Jan 14, 2025
@msynk msynk merged commit 7e52dcb into bitfoundation:develop Jan 14, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BitMessageBox component should inherit from BitComponentBase
2 participants