Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BIP158: fix btcutil gcs broken link. #1726

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

epysqyli
Copy link

https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/blob/master/gcs leads to a broken link. I'm assuming the correct replacement is at https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/tree/master/btcutil/gcs since btcutil is a sub-package in btcd, as stated in https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file

Copy link
Member

@jonatack jonatack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK, pinging BIP author and editor @Roasbeef for feedback.

@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ Light client: [https://github.com/lightninglabs/neutrino]

Full-node indexing: https://github.com/Roasbeef/btcd/tree/segwit-cbf

Golomb-Rice Coded sets: https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/blob/master/gcs
Golomb-Rice Coded sets: https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/tree/master/btcutil/gcs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Per https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/tree/master, "This package is now a sub-package in the btcutil directory of the btcd repository."

@murchandamus murchandamus added Proposed BIP modification Pending acceptance This BIP modification requires sign-off by the champion of the BIP being modified Bug fix labels Dec 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug fix Pending acceptance This BIP modification requires sign-off by the champion of the BIP being modified Proposed BIP modification
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants