Skip to content

simln-lib/refactor: move parsing into its own module #231

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

f3r10
Copy link
Collaborator

@f3r10 f3r10 commented Mar 15, 2025

fix #214

@f3r10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

f3r10 commented Mar 15, 2025

Hi, @carlaKC I found that async closures are already stabilized on the latest version of rust: rust-lang/rust#132706 so maybe I could update the CI to use version 1.85. WDYT?

btw. most of the changes are based on this previous commit of yours: carlaKC@1951bb8

@f3r10 f3r10 marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2025 02:28
@chuksys
Copy link
Contributor

chuksys commented Mar 17, 2025

WDYT of moving the NodeConnection enum into the parsing module as suggested in the issue description?

@f3r10
Copy link
Collaborator Author

f3r10 commented Mar 17, 2025

yes, you are right, @chuksys. NodeConnection also has to be moved.
I am going to close this PR so we can focus on yours #232

@f3r10 f3r10 closed this Mar 17, 2025
@carlaKC
Copy link
Contributor

carlaKC commented Mar 17, 2025

Hi, @carlaKC I found that async closures are already stabilized on the latest version of rust: rust-lang/rust#132706 so maybe I could update the CI to use version 1.85. WDYT?

Oh good news! I think let's bump version if we end up using them in the PR that addresses this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor: Move parsing into its own module
3 participants