Lazy operators #150
Closed
Lazy operators #150
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
divarvel
force-pushed
the
lazy-operators
branch
from
1a13c70
to
e255848
Compare
Open
|
I think i have found a way to have closures in the stack machine. Laziness is trivially implemented through closures, so this PR might be closed soon. |
|
superseded by 27ec12a |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #129 and the poc in biscuit-auth/biscuit-rust#188, here is a tentative specification of non-strict boolean operators.
The existing spec is a bit light wrt operations, so additional changes bringing more context might be necessary