Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add new slurm version #361

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add new slurm version #361

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bgruening
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@chambm
Copy link
Contributor

chambm commented Jul 11, 2017

Yay! Glad to see a SLURM update. Does this slurm-drmaa have support for cpus-per-node in the nativeSpecification?

@bgruening
Copy link
Owner Author

I don't think so. Slurm-drmaa has not seen any update in a while :(

@chambm
Copy link
Contributor

chambm commented Jul 11, 2017

@natefoo added it and I use it (quite necessary for nodes with 40 cores, like Jetstream has). Try this:

apt-get install bison libtool gperf ragel && \
git clone https://github.com/natefoo/slurm-drmaa.git --recurse-submodules \
cd slurm-drmaa && \
git checkout slurm-drmaa-1.2.0 && \
wget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/s/slurm-llnl/slurm-llnl_2.6.5.orig.tar.bz2 && \
tar xjf slurm-llnl_2.6.5.orig.tar.bz2 && \
./autogen.sh --with-slurm-inc=/root/slurm-drmaa/slurm-2.6.5 --with-slurm-lib=/root/slurm-drmaa && \
make && \
cp .libs/*.so /usr/local/lib

This is compiling against the old SLURM version though. Hmm. Maybe the .so will still work with new SLURM? ;)

@bgruening
Copy link
Owner Author

@natefoo is currently restructuring the slurm patches, expect some updates soon.
Which makes me think of removing this stuff here and waiting for ppa packages :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants