Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[Merged by Bors] - bevy_reflect: Improved documentation #7148
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - bevy_reflect: Improved documentation #7148
Changes from all commits
c9fabbd
fed2bf6
efa81a8
87dc78e
e799663
6f1f6ac
d1684bb
82c3d13
dcf3b93
a466a90
60fa2c7
51f318a
00b1a21
690797b
f7b3918
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to resolve the Fixme here: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/crates/bevy_asset/src/handle.rs#L119
Initially, I was confused why it works, as when expanding the derive, the Default of
Handle<T>
was used.Reading the following from the
Reflect
documentation of this PR removed the confusion:I don't know how to properly write this down here, but probably something like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually
#[reflect(Default)]
's special casing is likely to be removed by #7317. Ignored fields will useDefault
anyways, I’m pretty sure. If not— or if they want a custom default— they can mark the ignored field with#[reflect(default)]
.So I’m not sure we need to strictly change this.