fix: proximitytransport creation #106
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: D4ryl00 <[email protected]>
jefft0
changed the title
jefft0
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2025
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.0.4 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the proximity transport was created, it took a
host.Hostas argument. But since libp2p/go-libp2p#2118, the host argument is not more provided causing a failure on proximitytransport.Instead of getting the host, we get the swarm to work with.
Btw, I opened a libp2p PR to update the Transport option documentation: libp2p/go-libp2p#3144