Uncomment assertions of locals

[jackalcooper]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced macro expansion process for improved clarity and consistency.
  • Refined error handling for invalid operands during macro expansion.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated test cases for local variable tracking, simplifying assertions and enhancing coverage.

• Documentation

  • Improved clarity in the structure of the Charms.Defm.Expander module.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to the Charms.Defm.Expander module, focusing on the handling of MLIR operations and Elixir AST expansion. Key updates include modifications to the expand_macro function, which now processes the MLIR.Attribute module differently, and a revised method for accessing the module's body. Additionally, error handling in the expand_call_as_op function has been improved to better validate call arguments. The associated test cases have also been simplified and refined to enhance clarity and coverage for local variable tracking.

Changes

File	Change Summary
lib/charms/defm/expander.ex	- Updated expand_macro function to streamline processing of MLIR.Attribute. - Changed method for setting block from MLIR.CAPI.mlirModuleGetBody to MLIR.Module.body. - Refined error handling in expand_call_as_op for better validation of call arguments. - Updated method signatures for expand, expand_to_mlir, and decompose_call_signature without parameter changes.
test/expander_test.exs	- Simplified assertions in POCTest for local variables, focusing on direct integer values. - Activated previously commented out assertions for local variables in containers (lists, tuples, maps).

Possibly related PRs

• Macro const/1 as syntax sugar to create constant op #21: The introduction of the const/1 macro in the Charms.Defm module is directly related to the changes in the Charms.Defm.Expander module, particularly in how constants are handled during macro expansion.
• Update state.remotes when expanding calls #26: The updates to the expand_call_of_types function in the Charms.Defm.Expander module, which includes enhancements to state management and error reporting, are relevant to the changes made in the main PR regarding the expansion of MLIR operations.
• Improve error message and add tests for invalid argument or return type #38: The improvements in error handling and the addition of validation checks for argument and return types in the expand_macro function are closely related to the modifications in the main PR that refine error handling mechanisms.
• Attach custom diagnostic server in JIT and expander #44: The integration of a custom diagnostic server in the JIT and expander modules enhances error reporting, which aligns with the main PR's focus on improving error handling in the Charms.Defm.Expander module.

🐰 In the garden where code does bloom,
Changes sprout, dispelling gloom.
With macros refined and tests made bright,
We hop along, our future's light!
Local variables dance with glee,
In this code, we’re wild and free! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (1)

923-923: Improved readability by using high-level Module API.

The change from MLIR.CAPI.mlirModuleGetBody to MLIR.Module.body is a good improvement. It makes the code more idiomatic and maintainable by using the higher-level Module API instead of directly calling the CAPI function.

Consider applying similar refactoring to other CAPI calls in the codebase to maintain consistency in the API usage style.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e2bfa5 and 7b4a208.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (1 hunks)
• test/expander_test.exs (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

test/expander_test.exs (2)

32-33: LGTM! Clear and focused test cases.

The simplified test cases effectively validate local function tracking with both direct and nested calls. The assertions properly verify both function names and their arities.

---

41-41: LGTM! Comprehensive container testing.

The uncommented assertions provide thorough coverage of local function tracking across different container types (lists, tuples, maps) with varying complexities. The test cases progress logically from simple to complex scenarios, ensuring robust validation of local function tracking.

Also applies to: 43-45