Disallow reference loop between modules #39
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant restructuring within the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
test/support/ref_mod.ex (3)
1-4: Consider documenting the purpose of this module and its usage ofCharms.The module uses the
Charmslibrary, which seems to provide a custom DSL. It would be helpful to add a module documentation explaining its purpose and how it integrates withCharms.
9-11: Clarify the purpose ofterm_roundtrip1/1and its relation toterm_roundtrip0/2.The function
term_roundtrip1/1seems to do the same thing asterm_roundtrip0/2, but with one less parameter. Consider:
- Documenting the purpose of this function and how it differs from
term_roundtrip0/2.- If they serve the same purpose, consider consolidating them into a single function.
14-17: Consider documenting the purpose of this module and its relationship withRefereeMod.The module seems to be closely related to
RefereeMod. It would be helpful to add module documentation explaining its purpose and how it interacts withRefereeMod.test/defm_test.exs (1)
51-52: LGTM: Improved JIT initialization and code clarity.The changes enhance the test by:
- Capturing and verifying the JIT initialization key.
- Improving the readability of conditional statements.
These modifications add an extra layer of verification and make the test more maintainable.
Consider extracting the
:add_intatom into a module attribute for better maintainability:@test_jit_name :add_int # Then use @test_jit_name instead of :add_int in the testAlso applies to: 67-68
bench/enif_tim_sort.ex (1)
Line range hint
30-30: Consider making the run size adaptiveThe
tim_sortfunction uses a fixed run size of 32. While this is a common choice, consider making the run size adaptive based on the input size for potentially better performance on varying input lengths.Here's a suggestion for an adaptive run size:
run = max(32, min(64, n / 2))This approach ensures the run size is between 32 and 64, and scales with the input size for larger arrays.
bench/sort_util.ex (1)
6-6: Simplify the calculation ofn1The expression in line 6:
n1 = m - l + 1 - 1 + 1Simplifies to:
n1 = m - l + 1Consider simplifying the expression for clarity and readability.
Apply this diff to simplify the expression:
-n1 = m - l + 1 - 1 + 1 +n1 = m - l + 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- bench/enif_merge_sort.ex (1 hunks)
- bench/enif_tim_sort.ex (1 hunks)
- bench/sort_util.ex (1 hunks)
- lib/charms.ex (2 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm.ex (1 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (1 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (3 hunks)
- lib/charms/jit.ex (2 hunks)
- mix.exs (2 hunks)
- test/defm_test.exs (4 hunks)
- test/expander_test.exs (1 hunks)
- test/support/child_mod.ex (0 hunks)
- test/support/ref_mod.ex (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- test/support/child_mod.ex
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (27)
test/support/ref_mod.ex (1)
1-23: Verify the necessity of circular references between modules.The PR title mentions "Ban reference loop", but this file introduces two modules that seem to reference each other.
ReferrerModcalls functions fromRefereeMod, which might create a circular dependency. Please verify if this is intentional and aligns with the PR objectives.To check for other potential circular references, you can run:
Consider refactoring to avoid circular dependencies if they are not intentional. This could involve:
- Moving shared functionality to a separate module.
- Rethinking the module structure to have a clear hierarchy.
- Using callbacks or behaviors instead of direct references if appropriate.
test/defm_test.exs (2)
29-35: LGTM: New test case improves module interface verification.This new test case effectively verifies the export status of functions in the
RefereeModmodule. It ensures that only the intended functions are exposed, which is crucial for maintaining proper encapsulation and module interface integrity.
94-96: Verify changes in JIT destruction process.The modifications to the cleanup assertions are good:
- The expected result for
Charms.JIT.destroy(ENIFMergeSort)has changed from:noopto:ok.- A new assertion for destroying
SortUtilhas been added.These changes suggest updates to the JIT destruction process and the addition of a new module to be cleaned up.
To ensure consistency, let's verify the changes in the
Charms.JIT.destroyfunction:bench/enif_tim_sort.ex (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Clarify how the PR objective "Ban reference loop" is addressedThe PR title mentions "Ban reference loop", but it's not immediately clear how this objective is met by the current changes. Could you please elaborate on how this change contributes to banning reference loops? This information would be valuable for reviewers and future maintainers.
To help clarify this, could you provide more context on:
- What specific reference loops were problematic?
- How does moving the merge operation to
SortUtiladdress this issue?- Are there any other changes in the PR that contribute to this objective?
test/expander_test.exs (1)
163-163: Approved: More flexible pattern matching, but verifyCharms.JIT.init/2contract.The change to use
{_key, %Charms.JIT{}}instead of{:ok, %Charms.JIT{}}makes the test more flexible, allowing for any key in the returned tuple. This is good for accommodating potential changes in theCharms.JIT.init/2function's return value.To ensure this change aligns with the intended behavior of
Charms.JIT.init/2, please run the following script:This will help confirm whether the function's contract has changed or if the more flexible pattern is intended to accommodate multiple success states.
lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (4)
672-672: Minor improvement in symbol name generationThe change from using SHA256 to
erlang:phash2/1for generating symbol names is a good optimization. This should provide faster symbol name generation while still maintaining a low probability of collisions.
Line range hint
962-989: New macro expansion for:opimproves flexibilityThis new
expand_macro/5clause for the:opmacro enhances the module's capability to handle MLIR operations more flexibly. Here are the key improvements:
- It now uses the new
decompose_call_signature/1function to separate the call and return types.- The dialect and operation are extracted from the call, allowing for dynamic operation creation.
- It handles both inferred and explicitly specified return types.
- The creation of the MLIR operation is now more streamlined and consistent with other parts of the module.
These changes should make it easier to work with various MLIR operations within the macro system.
1211-1221: Newdecompose_call_signature/1function improves code organizationThe addition of the
decompose_call_signature/1function is a good refactoring step. It separates the logic for decomposing call signatures from the macro expansion logic, which improves code organization and reusability.The function handles two cases:
- Calls with an explicit return type (using the
::operator).- Calls without an explicit return type.
This separation of concerns makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand.
Line range hint
672-1221: Overall improvements in symbol generation, macro expansion, and code organizationThe changes in this file represent significant improvements to the
Charms.Defm.Expandermodule:
- The symbol name generation has been optimized by using
erlang:phash2/1instead of SHA256.- The macro expansion system has been enhanced to handle MLIR operations more flexibly, particularly with the new
:opmacro expansion.- The introduction of the
decompose_call_signature/1function improves code organization and reusability.These changes should result in better performance, increased flexibility in handling MLIR operations, and improved maintainability of the codebase.
bench/enif_merge_sort.ex (2)
Line range hint
5-22: Code changes are appropriate and maintain functionalityThe restructuring of the
ENIFMergeSortmodule by moving themergefunctionality toSortUtilenhances modularity and reusability. The updated call in thedo_sortfunction correctly delegates the merge operation toSortUtil.merge, and the overall logic of the sorting algorithm remains intact.
13-13: Verify thatSortUtil.merge/4is defined and compatiblePlease confirm that the
SortUtilmodule defines themerge/4function with the expected parameters and behavior. This verification ensures that the refactoring does not introduce any discrepancies or runtime errors due to differences in the merge implementation.Run the following script to confirm that
SortUtildefines themerge/4function:mix.exs (3)
12-13: Integration of documentation options looks goodThe addition of
docs: docs()integrates the documentation options into the project's configuration correctly.
37-62: Injection of Mermaid scripts for documentation renderingThe
before_closing_head_tag/1function correctly injects the necessary scripts to render Mermaid diagrams in the generated documentation. This enhances the documentation by allowing inline diagrams.
64-68: Documentation configuration is set up correctlyThe
docs/0function correctly specifies the documentation options, including thebefore_closing_head_tagcallback for injecting custom scripts.bench/sort_util.ex (4)
5-5: Confirm the usage ofdefmfor function definitionYou are using
defmto define themergefunction. Please ensure thatdefmis the appropriate macro or function for defining this function within the context of theCharmslibrary.
9-10: Ensure proper memory management for allocated pointersThe pointers
left_tempandright_tempare allocated usingPointer.allocate. Ensure that any allocated memory is properly managed and deallocated if necessary to prevent memory leaks.Would you like assistance in verifying if the allocated memory is correctly deallocated?
33-58: Review the condition within the main merging loopIn the
while_loopstarting at line 33, the condition is:while_loop(Pointer.load(i32(), i_ptr) < n1 && Pointer.load(i32(), j_ptr) < n2) doEnsure that this condition correctly represents the intended logic for merging the subarrays, and verify that the pointers
i_ptr,j_ptr, andk_ptrare being updated appropriately within the loop.
60-84: Confirm the correctness of the remaining elements copy loopsThe
while_loops starting at lines 60 and 73 handle copying any remaining elements fromleft_tempandright_tempto the original array. Verify that these loops correctly handle the copying process and that the indices and pointers are managed properly.lib/charms.ex (5)
39-40: Definition of__use_ir__is appropriateThe function
__use_ir__is correctly defined and marked with@doc falseto exclude it from generated documentation.
48-59: Proper handling of referenced modules in__before_compile__/1The updated
__before_compile__/1macro correctly processesdefmdeclarations and compiles them. The logic that iterates overreferenced_modulesand excludesenv.moduleeffectively prevents self-referencing, which helps avoid circular dependencies.
61-70: Efficient computation of@ir_hashThe computation of
@ir_hashby combining the hash of@irwith hashes from referenced modules is well-implemented. Excluding__MODULE__in the recursive hash gathering prevents self-referencing issues.
77-81:__ir__hash__function is correctly implementedThe
__ir__hash__function properly returns@ir_hashand is marked with@doc falseto keep it internal.
95-95: Simplification of thedefmmacro definitionThe
defmmacro now directly delegates toCharms.Defm.Definition.declare/3, which simplifies the macro and improves maintainability.lib/charms/jit.ex (4)
5-5: Approved: AliasLockedCachecorrectly addedThe alias for
LockedCachefrom__MODULE__is appropriately added and enhances code readability.
132-137: Approved: Introduction ofkey_of_module/1functionThe new
key_of_module(module)function enhances code clarity by encapsulating the key generation logic and safely checks ifmoduleexports__ir__hash__/0before calling it. This improvement helps prevent potential runtime errors and promotes code maintainability.
144-145: Approved: Consistent use ofkey_of_module/1inengine/1The usage of
key_of_module(module)in theengine/1function ensures consistent key retrieval and aligns with the updated key management strategy.
153-155: Approved: Consistent key usage indestroy/1functionUsing
key_of_module(module)in thedestroy/1function maintains consistency across the module and ensures that keys are accurately derived for cache operations.
refactor Update jit.ex Update jit.ex Update jit.ex
jackalcooper
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
test/defm_test.exs (2)
29-35: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The new test case effectively verifies the export behavior of functions defined with the
defmmacro. It ensures that only the correct functions are exported and accessible.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this test, e.g.:
# Verify that only the correct functions are exported when using the `defm` macro
51-52: LGTM! Consider using consistent formatting for conditionals.The changes improve code readability and add a valuable assertion for the JIT initialization process. The new key assertion enhances the test's robustness.
For consistency, consider formatting the nested
cond_brstatement similarly to the outer one:cond_br enif_get_int64(env, a, ptr_a) != 0 do cond_br enif_get_int64(env, b, ptr_b) != 0 do # ... (rest of the code) else ^arg_err end else ^arg_err endAlso applies to: 67-68
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- lib/charms.ex (2 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (1 hunks)
- lib/charms/jit.ex (2 hunks)
- test/defm_test.exs (4 hunks)
- test/macro_test.exs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (18)
test/macro_test.exs (1)
7-7: Approved: Refined destruction assertion using__ir_digest__()The change from
Charms.JIT.destroy(CallMacroMod)toCharms.JIT.destroy(CallMacroMod.__ir_digest__())appears to be a more precise approach to cleanup or resource management. This modification maintains the original intent of the test while potentially improving its specificity.Could you please clarify the rationale behind using
__ir_digest__()instead of the module directly? This information would be valuable for understanding the broader context of this change and its implications for the JIT compilation process.To verify the usage of
__ir_digest__(), let's run the following script:This will help us understand if this change is part of a broader pattern in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
__ir_digest__()across the codebaseThe modification in
test/macro_test.exsaligns with the established usage of__ir_digest__()observed in other test files and library modules. This change maintains the original intent of the test while adhering to the project's conventions for module cleanup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of __ir_digest__() in the codebase # Search for __ir_digest__() usage echo "Occurrences of __ir_digest__():" rg --type elixir "__ir_digest__\(\)" # Search for Charms.JIT.destroy usage echo "\nOccurrences of Charms.JIT.destroy:" rg --type elixir "Charms\.JIT\.destroy"Length of output: 1424
test/defm_test.exs (2)
Line range hint
1-92: Overall improvements to test coverage and clarity.The changes in this file enhance the test suite for the Charms library. New test cases have been added, existing ones have been clarified, and assertions have been updated to reflect changes in the underlying implementation. These improvements contribute to better code quality and more robust testing.
Key improvements:
- New test case for verifying function export behavior with the
defmmacro.- Enhanced assertions in the JIT initialization and destruction processes.
- Improved code formatting for better readability.
These changes will help maintain the reliability and correctness of the Charms library as it evolves.
89-92: Verify the updated JIT destruction behavior.The changes to the JIT destruction assertions reflect updates in the underlying implementation. The new assertion for SortUtil is a good addition to ensure comprehensive cleanup.
Please confirm that the change from
:noopto:okfor ENIFMergeSort destruction is intentional and consistent with the updated JIT implementation. Also, verify that the:noopresult for SortUtil destruction is the expected behavior.✅ Verification successful
JIT destruction assertions are correctly implemented.
The changes in the JIT destruction assertions are consistent with the current codebase. The transition from
:noopto:okforENIFMergeSortand the addition of theSortUtildestruction assertion are correctly reflected and validated.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify JIT destruction behavior in the codebase # Test: Search for JIT destruction calls and their expected results rg --type elixir -e "Charms\.JIT\.destroy.*:ok" -e "Charms\.JIT\.destroy.*:noop"Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify all JIT destruction calls in the Elixir codebase # Search for all Charms.JIT.destroy calls and their assertions rg --type elixir 'assert\s+:?(ok|noop)\s+=\s+Charms\.JIT\.destroy\('Length of output: 637
lib/charms/jit.ex (6)
5-5: LGTM: Improved module aliasingThe addition of the
LockedCachealias enhances code readability and maintainability by allowing more concise references throughout the module.
112-130: LGTM: Improved key handling and caching logicThe changes to use a key from options and the updated
LockedCache.runcall improve the flexibility and robustness of the caching mechanism. The conditional block for processing modules enhances performance by avoiding unnecessary operations.
136-137: LGTM: Consistent use of keys for cache accessThe update to the
enginefunction to use a key instead of a module directly aligns well with the changes made in theinitfunction. This modification enhances consistency in how modules are identified and accessed throughout the module.
Line range hint
144-153: LGTM: Consistent key-based approach in destroy functionThe update to the
destroyfunction to use a key instead of a module directly is consistent with the changes made in other functions. The error handling for various scenarios has been preserved, maintaining the robustness of the function.
Line range hint
1-153: Overall improvement in caching mechanism and consistencyThe changes to the
Charms.JITmodule represent a significant improvement in the caching mechanism and overall consistency of the code. The shift to a key-based approach for identifying and accessing JIT instances enhances flexibility and potentially improves performance. These modifications appear to be part of a well-thought-out refactoring effort that maintains the module's core functionality while making it more robust and easier to maintain.
123-126:⚠️ Potential issuePotential issue: Incorrect use of
modulein for loop guardThe guard condition
when is_atom(module)usesmodulefrom the outer scope instead ofm. This may not filter the list as intended. Consider changing it towhen is_atom(m)to correctly check each element in the list.Apply this diff to correct the guard:
-for m when is_atom(module) <- modules, +for m when is_atom(m) <- modules,lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (4)
1-41: LGTM: Well-documented module with appropriate importsThe module documentation provides a clear and comprehensive overview of the compilation process, including a helpful mermaid diagram. The imports and aliases are appropriate for the module's functionality.
100-110: LGTM: Well-implementeddeclare/3functionThe
declare/3function correctly creates a new struct instance and generates an appropriate quoted expression for declaring a JIT-compilable function. The implementation aligns well with the module's purpose.
112-141: LGTM: Thorough implementation ofnormalize_call/1The
normalize_call/1function provides a comprehensive normalization of function calls, correctly handling different argument types (env, term, typed). The implementation is well-structured and aligns with the module's requirements.
184-206: LGTM: Well-implementedreferenced_modules/1functionThe
referenced_modules/1function efficiently traverses the IR and correctly extracts referenced module names from function calls. The implementation is well-structured and uses appropriate data structures (MapSet) for efficient operations.lib/charms.ex (5)
39-40: Well-defined private function__use_ir__/0The addition of the
__use_ir__/0function with@doc falseappropriately provides a private interface for internal use without exposing it in the public API.
48-59: Verify prevention of circular dependencies in__before_compile__/1The macro
__before_compile__/1prevents circular dependencies by invoking__use_ir__/0on referenced modules, excluding the current module. Please ensure that all referenced modules implement__use_ir__/0to avoid runtime errors.
61-71: Ensure consistency in IR hash computation across modulesThe calculation of
@ir_hashcombines the hash of@irwith the IR digests of referenced modules. Verify that the__ir_digest__/0function in all referenced modules returns an appropriate hash to maintain consistency.
78-81: Correct implementation of__ir_digest__/0The
__ir_digest__/0function correctly returns@ir_hash, and the use of@doc falsekeeps it internal.
96-96: Simplification ofdefm/2macro enhances modularityDelegating the definition to
Charms.Defm.Definition.declare/3simplifiesdefm/2, improving the modularity and maintainability of the code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
lib/charms.ex (3)
48-81: LGTM! Consider adding explanatory comments.The changes to the
__before_compile__macro significantly enhance the handling of intermediate representations and module references. The new logic for preventing circular dependencies is a valuable addition.To improve maintainability, consider adding comments explaining:
- The purpose of the
__ir_digest__/0function.- The rationale behind the module reference checking logic.
- The significance of the
@ir_hashattribute.These comments would help future developers understand the intent behind these complex operations.
95-97: LGTM! Consider updating the documentation.The simplification of the
defmmacro is a great improvement. Delegating the complexity toCharms.Defm.Definition.declare/3enhances maintainability and readability.To keep the documentation in sync with the implementation:
- Update the
@docstring for thedefmmacro to reflect its new, simpler implementation.- Consider adding a link or reference to the
Charms.Defm.Definitionmodule for developers who need to understand the underlying complexity.
Line range hint
1-97: Consider adding tests for new functionality.The changes to the
Charmsmodule introduce significant enhancements, particularly in IR handling and preventing circular dependencies. To ensure the robustness of these new features, consider adding or updating tests to cover:
- The new
__use_ir__and__ir_digest__functions.- The circular dependency prevention mechanism.
- The simplified
defmmacro with its delegation toCharms.Defm.Definition.declare/3.These tests would help validate the new functionality and protect against future regressions.
Would you like assistance in drafting some example test cases for these new features?
lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (2)
135-175: Effective implementation of safety checks and optimizationsThe
check_poison!/1andappend_missing_return/1functions implement important safety checks and optimizations for the IR. The pattern matching inappend_missing_return/1effectively handles different cases.However, there's room for improvement in the error handling of
check_poison!/1:Enhance exception handling for better debugging
Consider applying this change to improve the raised exception:
- |> raise + |> (&raise ArgumentError, message: &1).()This change creates an
ArgumentErrorwith a detailed message, which is more idiomatic and provides clearer information for debugging.
200-248: Comprehensive compilation process with room for improvementThe
compile/1function implements a thorough compilation process, including the creation of MLIR structures, expansion of definitions, and application of various passes. Theextract_mangled_mod/1function effectively handles the extraction of module names from mangled names.However, the
compile/1function is quite extensive and could benefit from refactoring:Consider refactoring
compile/1for improved readabilityThe function could be broken down into smaller, well-named helper functions. For example:
- Extract the MLIR module creation into a separate function.
- Move the definition expansion loop into its own function.
- Separate the pass composition and execution into another function.
This refactoring could result in a clearer
compile/1function that orchestrates the compilation process more transparently:def compile(definitions) when is_list(definitions) do ctx = create_mlir_context() m = create_mlir_module(ctx) expand_definitions(definitions, ctx, m) |> run_passes(ctx) |> handle_compilation_result(ctx) endThis approach would make the overall compilation process easier to understand and maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- lib/charms.ex (2 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm.ex (1 hunks)
- lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (1 hunks)
- test/call_test.exs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (11)
test/call_test.exs (1)
23-23: Improved test assertion specificityThe change to include the error type
(ArgumentError)in the assertion is a good improvement. It makes the test more precise by ensuring not only the presence of the error message but also the correct error type. This enhancement reduces the likelihood of false positives and aligns with best practices in testing.lib/charms/defm.ex (2)
3-5: Improved module documentationThe updated module documentation provides clearer and more specific information about the purpose and functionality of
Charms.Defm. It now accurately describes the module as a DSL for defining JIT-compilable functions and specifies its role in defining thedefmDSL syntax.Additionally, the grammatical error mentioned in a previous review has been corrected.
1-1: Verify the impact of removed dependencies and functionsSeveral
requireandusestatements have been removed, along with multiple private functions. While these changes are not visible in the provided code, they could significantly impact the module's behavior and its integration with other parts of the system.
- Could you provide more information about why these dependencies and functions were removed?
- How has the implementation of
compile_definitionsbeen affected by these changes?- Have you thoroughly tested the module to ensure it still functions correctly after these removals?
To help verify the impact of these changes, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any lingering references to removed dependencies or functions, and show the current implementation of
compile_definitions.lib/charms.ex (3)
31-31: LGTM! Improved module description.The description for
Charms.Intrinsichas been updated as suggested in the previous review. The new wording is clearer and more accurately describes the module's purpose.
39-40: Please clarify the purpose of__use_ir__/0.A new private function
__use_ir__/0has been added, which returnsnil. Could you please explain the intended purpose of this function? Understanding its role would help in assessing its implementation and potential impact on the module's behavior.
95-97: Verify the impact of removed code.The simplification of the
defmmacro involves removing significant portions of the old implementation. While this is generally a positive change, it's crucial to ensure that all necessary functionality has been maintained.Could you please confirm that:
- All use cases supported by the old implementation are still supported?
- There are no breaking changes for existing users of the
defmmacro?- If there are any breaking changes, they are documented and a migration path is provided?
lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (5)
1-35: Excellent module documentation and structureThe module definition and documentation are well-crafted. The comprehensive explanation of the compilation process, including the mermaid diagram, provides clear insights into the module's purpose and functionality. This level of detail will greatly aid developers in understanding and using the module effectively.
37-42: Well-structured module setup and struct definitionThe module setup with required modules and aliases is appropriate. The struct definition comprehensively captures all necessary information for a function definition, which will facilitate easier manipulation and processing of function data throughout the module.
44-60: Effective implementation ofnew/3functionThe
new/3function efficiently creates and initializes a new struct instance. The processing of the call signature, normalization of the call, and determination of theexportedflag usingmatch?/2are well-implemented. This function provides a solid foundation for creating function definitions within the module.
104-133: Comprehensive implementation ofnormalize_call/1The
normalize_call/1function effectively normalizes function calls by processing their arguments. It handles special cases forenvandtermarguments, and wraps arguments with appropriate type specifications. This implementation ensures that function calls are consistently formatted and typed throughout the module, which is crucial for reliable JIT compilation and invocation.
176-198: Efficient implementation ofreferenced_modules/1The
referenced_modules/1function effectively extracts referenced modules from the IR. It usesBeaver.Walker.postwalk/3to traverse the IR efficiently, handling "func.call" operations and extracting module names from the callee attribute. The use ofMapSetensures that only unique module references are collected. The separation of mangled module name extraction intoextract_mangled_mod/1promotes code modularity and reusability.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Charmsmodule with new macros and improved handling of JIT-compiled functions.SortUtilmodule for merging functionality.defmfunctions in the newCharms.Defm.Definitionmodule.decompose_call_signaturefunction inCharms.Defm.Expander.Bug Fixes
Charms.JITmodule.Documentation
Charms.Defmmodule and added new documentation capabilities in theCharms.MixProject.Tests
Chores
ChildModandChildMod2modules.