-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 479
Bump min Bazel version to 6.3 #2150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you document in the PR description what motivated the change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks! Is the update because of new coverage stuff? Could you describe / link to the changes we depend on in the PR description?
Unfortunately I think coverage issues are present also in 6.3 and onwards bazelbuild/bazel#19098. I updated the PR description though. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
A future Bazel version will contain a breaking API change. bazelbuild#2072 is preparing the `rules_rust` codebase for it, however it relies on Bazel API changes present in `6.3.0` and not `6.0.0`. As per discussion there bazelbuild#2072 (comment), looks like maintainers are fine with bumping the minimum Bazel version to `6.3.0`.
A future Bazel version will contain a breaking API change. #2072 is preparing the
rules_rust
codebase for it, however it relies on Bazel API changes present in6.3.0
and not6.0.0
. As per discussion there #2072 (comment), looks like maintainers are fine with bumping the minimum Bazel version to6.3.0
.