-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Adding figures and most of chapter 8.
- Loading branch information
Showing
9 changed files
with
313 additions
and
3 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,288 @@ | ||
\section{Form of Polyatomic Partition Function}% | ||
\label{sec:polyppf} | ||
With the knowledge of appropriateness to treat particular degrees of freedom | ||
classically, we can approach the topic of polyatomic molecule using an | ||
suitable combination of classical and quantum mechanics. Of course the full | ||
quantum mechanical solution will be strictly more accurate, but not necessarily | ||
usefully more accurate. | ||
\subsection{Approximations} | ||
In order to derive the vibrational and electronic modes, the Born-Oppenheimer | ||
approximation is necessary. In doing so we wish to arrive at a description of | ||
the electronic potential in as a function of a currently unknown number of | ||
variables. To fully describe a polyatomic molecule's position $3n$ coordinates | ||
are needed, where $n$ is the number of atoms in the molecule. 3 coordinates can | ||
describe the center of mass of the particle. 2 $(\theta \text{ and }\phi)$ or 3 | ||
$(\theta,~\phi,\text{ and }\psi)$ coordinates uniquely specify the rotation of a | ||
rigid linear and non-linear body respectively. This leaves $3n - 5$ or $3n - 6$ | ||
degrees of freedom internal to the molecule. Thus, the internal motion of the | ||
molecule occurs in a potential energy landscape of $3n - 5$ or $3n - 6$ | ||
dimensions. | ||
|
||
Furthermore, in order to deal with vibrational and rotational energy modes | ||
separately, we will make the rigid-rotor harmonic oscillator approximation | ||
again. | ||
|
||
\subsection{Translational, Electric, and Nuclear Partition Functions} | ||
The translational partition function is identical to the previous cases except | ||
that we must be careful to define translation as the movement of the center of | ||
mass of the particle. Therefore, the translational partition function is | ||
\begin{equation} | ||
q_{trans} = {\left(\frac{2\pi mkT}{h^3}\right)}V. | ||
\end{equation} | ||
The electronic partition function is also identical. We set the energy zero | ||
to the energy where all atoms are separated in their ground state, in | ||
other words the ground state is at an energy, $-D_e$. The partition function is | ||
then, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{elect} = \omega_{e1} e^{D_{e}/kT}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
We ignore any state other than the ground state for nuclei and set the nuclear | ||
partition function, $q_{nucl} = 1$. | ||
|
||
\section{Vibrational Partition Function}% | ||
\label{sec:polyvpf} | ||
Given the previous analysis of the potential energy field of the nuclei of the | ||
molecule, the nuclei vibrate in $(3n - 5)$ or $(3n - 6)$ dimensions. These | ||
relative dimensions will involve combinations of the nuclei's positions such | ||
that in the squaring of terms leave cross terms. An example would be the | ||
combination, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
(x_2 - x_{1})^{2} = x_{2}^2 - 2 x_1 x_2 + x_1^2. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
The square comes from the assumption that force is roughly linear with small | ||
deviations from the equilibrium positions this is the harmonic oscillator | ||
assumption. Luckily using a method called \textit{normal coordinate analysis} | ||
can determine a set of coordinates $\{Q_{i}\}$ such that each harmonic | ||
oscillator is devoid of cross terms. The Hamiltonian is thus | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
\H &= K + U\\ | ||
&= - \sum_{j=1}^{\alpha}{\frac{\hbar^2}{2 \mu_j} | ||
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial Q_j^2}} + | ||
\sum_{j=1}^{\alpha}{\frac{k_j}{2}Q_{j^2}} \quad \alpha = 3n - 5 | ||
\text{ or } 3n - 6 | ||
\end{align*} | ||
where $\mu_j$ and $k_j$ are effective masses and force constants for these | ||
normal coordinates respectively. In solving the above Hamiltonian, the total | ||
energy becomes, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
\varepsilon = \sum_{j=1}^{\alpha}{(n_j + \frac{1}{2})h \nu_j} | ||
\quad\text{for}\quad n_j = 0, 1, 2, \ldots | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
where, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
\nu_j = \frac{1}{2\pi} {\left(\frac{k_{j}}{\mu_{j}}\right)}^{1/2}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
|
||
The normal coordinates come from analyzing the potential modes of vibration in a | ||
molecular system. Each independent mode $M$ has a corresponding coordinate $Q$ | ||
that denotes deviation from the equilibrium position inherent to the mode. For | ||
$CO_2$, an example of normal coordinate analysis can be found, see | ||
Fig~\ref{fig:polyco2}. | ||
\begin{figure}[htpb] | ||
\centering | ||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{co2.png} | ||
\caption{$CO_2$ normal coordinate analysis} | ||
\label{fig:polyco2} | ||
\end{figure} | ||
With the normal coordinates then, the partition function is | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{vib} = \prod_{j=1}^{\alpha}{\frac{e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}/2T}}}{(1 - | ||
e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}}/T}}}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
The energy and heat capacity are, | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
E_{vib} &= Nk \sum_{j=1}^{\alpha}{\left(\frac{\theta_{\nu_j}}{2} + | ||
\frac{\theta_{\nu_j} e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}/2T}}}{1 - | ||
e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}}/T}}\right)}\\ | ||
C_{v,vib} &= Nk | ||
\sum_{j=1}^{\alpha}{\left[\left( \frac{\theta_{\nu_{j}}}{T}\right)^2 | ||
\frac{e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}/2T}}}{1 - e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}}/T}}. | ||
\right]}\\ | ||
\end{align*} | ||
|
||
\section{Rotational Partition Function}% | ||
\label{sec:polyrpf} | ||
The rotational partition function depends a lot on the molecules inherent | ||
symmetries. A theorem of rigid body motion which is the mode of energy in | ||
consideration here, is always definable on 3 orthogonal principle axis where the | ||
inertia tensor becomes diagonal. Each entry in the tensor is defined by | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
I_{ij} = \sum_{l=1}^{n}{m_l (x_{l,i} - x_{i,cm})(x_{l,j} - x_{j,cm}). | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
So the theorem states there are orthogonal coordinate axes that make $I_{ij} = | ||
0 ~ \text{for} ~ i \ne j$. | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
\left[\begin{array}{c c c} | ||
I_{xx} & 0 & 0\\ | ||
0 & I_{yy} & 0\\ | ||
0 & 0 & I_{zz} | ||
\end{array}\right]. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
From the diagaonalization of the tensor $\overline{I}$ 4 cases exist: 3 | ||
identical $I$'s, 2 equal $I$'s, 3 unique $I$'s, and 2 identical nonzero $I$'s | ||
and 1 zero $I$. These different cases are known as | ||
spherical top, symmetric top, asymmetric top, and linear. | ||
As a brief aside, a nomenclature for these 3 values have the subscripts as $I_a, | ||
I_b, I_c$ and a convenient rescaling of the moments is given by, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
{(\overline{A},\overline{B},\overline{C})} = \frac{h}{8\pi I_{a,b,c} c}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
\subsection{Linear Molecules} | ||
For linear molecules, the problem is the same as the diatomic case. The moment | ||
of inertia is given by $I = \sum_{i=1}^{n}{m_i r_i^2}$, where $r_{i}^2$ is the | ||
distance from the center of mass. The final partition function is the same as | ||
before | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{8 \pi^2 IkT}{\sigma h^2} = \frac{T}{\sigma \Theta_r}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
Once again $\sigma$ is the symmetry number which represents the number of | ||
indistinguishable configurations a molecule has. | ||
\subsection{Non-Linear Molecules} | ||
Non-linear rigid bodies have at least two different diagonal moments of | ||
inertia. The principle axis are usually located on the axis of symmetry and | ||
highly symmetric molecules usually have more of their moment of inertia | ||
components the same. | ||
\subsubsection{Spherical Tops} | ||
The case of the spherical top applies to molecules like $CH_4$ and $CCl_4$ and | ||
other highly symmetric molecules. The energy levels of this system are | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
\varepsilon_j &= \frac{J(J+1)\hbar^2}{2I} \qquad J = 0,1,2,\ldots\\ | ||
\text{with degeneracy}\\ | ||
\omega_j &= (2J + 1)^2. | ||
\end{align*} | ||
The taking the classical approximation $q_{rot}$ is given by | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{1}{\sigma} | ||
\int_{0}^{\infty}{(2J + 1)^2 e^{-J(J+1)\hbar^{2}/2kT}\d{J}}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
In addition, at large values of $J$ the $(J + 1) \approx J$, so | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} &= \frac{1}{\sigma} | ||
\int_{0}^{\infty}{4J^2 e^{-J^2 \hbar^{2}/2IkT}\d{J}}\\ | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
Let, | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
u &= 2J &\text{and} \quad | ||
\d{v} = 2J e^{-J^2 \hbar^{2}/2kT}\\ | ||
\d{u} &= 2 \d{J} &\text{and} \quad | ||
v = \frac{4IkT}{\hbar^2} e^{-J^2 \hbar^{2}/2IkT}, | ||
\end{align*} | ||
Here, I note that the integral is directly analogous to that used to prove the | ||
law of equipartition derived in Section\ref{sec:eoe}. Then, the final solution | ||
is | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{1}{\sigma} | ||
{\left( \frac{8\pi^{2/3} IkT}{h^2} \right)}^{3/2}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
Note that the $3/2$ power comes from the constant of $v$ and the | ||
evaluation of $\int{v \d{u}}$ which provides 1 and $1/2$ power | ||
respectively. | ||
\subsubsection{Symmetric Tops} | ||
The symmetric top also has a analytical quantum mechanical solution. A theorem | ||
states that any rigid body with at least $n \ge 3$ fold axis of symmetry is at | ||
least a symmetric top. The energy levels are | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
\varepsilon_{JK} &= \frac{\hbar^2}{2} | ||
{\left( \frac{J(J+1)}{I_A} + K^2 | ||
{\left[\frac{1}{I_c} - \frac{1}{I_{a}}\right]} | ||
\right)}\\ | ||
J &= 0,1,2,\ldots | ||
~ \text{and} ~ K = J, J-1, \ldots, -J\\ | ||
\text{with degeneracy}\\ | ||
\omega_{JK} &= (2J+1). | ||
\end{align*} | ||
$K$ represents the distribution of energy in the non symmetric axis. By | ||
definition then, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{1}{\sigma} | ||
\sum_{J=0}^{\infty}{(2J+1) e^{-\alpha_A J(J+1)}} | ||
\sum_{K=-J}^{J}{e^{-(\alpha_C - \alpha_{A})K^2}}, | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
with | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
\alpha_j = \frac{\hbar^2}{2I_j kT}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
The classical limit (integral) of this equation evaluates much the same as | ||
previously using the results of the error function as has been repeatedly done, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{\pi^{1/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{8\pi^2 I_A kT}{h^2}\right)} | ||
{\left(\frac{8\pi^2 I_C kT}{h^2}\right)}^{1/2}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
\subsubsection{Asymmetric Tops} | ||
The case of asymmetric tops is only numerically solvable in quantum mechanics; | ||
thus, a fully classical approach is necessary to get a closed form partition | ||
function. The classical solution is of the same ilk as the other as one | ||
might expect, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{\pi^{1/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{8\pi^2 I_A kT}{h^2}\right)}^{1/2} | ||
{\left(\frac{8\pi^2 I_B kT}{h^2}\right)}^{1/2} | ||
{\left(\frac{8\pi^2 I_C kT}{h^2}\right)}^{1/2}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
With rotational temperatures, | ||
\begin{equation*} | ||
q_{rot} = \frac{\pi^{1/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{T^3}{\Theta_A \Theta_B \Theta_{C}}\right)}. | ||
\end{equation*} | ||
\subsubsection{Hindered Rotation} | ||
If rotation around a particular bond --- such as the carbon-carbon bond in | ||
ethane --- causes a meaningful change in potential the rotation is hindered. | ||
Previously in this chapter, we have only considered molecules whose internal | ||
rotation occurs in a equa-potential field or internal rotation is unhindered | ||
(free). When internal rotation is free, such motion does not contribute to the | ||
partition function. Taking the ethane example, such internal rotation must be | ||
taken into consideration when deriving the partition function. Let's use the | ||
potential energy of the rotation of the hydrogen in ethane as shown in | ||
Figure~\ref{fig:polyhinderedrotation}. | ||
\begin{figure}[htpb] | ||
\centering | ||
\includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth]{hindered_rotation.png} | ||
\caption{Generic hindered rotation potential field}% | ||
\label{fig:polyhinderedrotation} | ||
\end{figure} | ||
At low temperatures where $kT \ll V_0$ the energy mode can be treated as a | ||
harmonic oscillator around a energy minimum. If $kT \gg V_0$ the problem | ||
rotation is free and a rigid rotor approximation is valid. However, when $kT | ||
\approx V_0$ a different approach must be taken. In this case, we need an | ||
analytical form of the potential, in this case $\frac{1}{2} V_0 (1 - | ||
\cos{3\phi})$. The Schrödinger equation is difficult or impossible to solve | ||
analytically, but the eigenvalues of the function are known. | ||
\section{Thermodynamic Relations}% | ||
\label{sec:polytr} | ||
Here I copy some general thermodynamic relations, | ||
\begin{align*} | ||
q &= q_{trans} q_{rot} q_{vib} q_{elec}\\ | ||
&= {\left(\frac{2\pi mkT}{h^3}\right)}^{3/2}V \cdot | ||
\frac{\pi^{1/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{T^3}{\Theta_A \Theta_B \Theta_{C}}\right)}^{1/2} | ||
{\left(\prod_{j=1}^{3n-6}{\frac{e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}/2T}}}{(1 - | ||
e^{-\theta_{\nu_{j}}/T})}}\right)} | ||
\omega_{e1} e^{D_o /kT}\\ | ||
\frac{-A}{NkT} &= \ln{\left(\frac{2\pi MkT}{h^2}\right)} | ||
\frac{Ve}{N} + \ln{\left[\frac{\pi^{1/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{T^3}{\Theta_A \Theta_B \Theta_{C}}\right)}^{1/2} | ||
\right]} | ||
\sum_{j=1}^{3n-6}{\left(\frac{\Theta_{\nuj}}{2T} + | ||
\ln{(1 - e^{-\Theta_{\nuj}/T})}\right)} + | ||
\frac{D_e}{kT} + \ln{\omega_{e1}}\\ | ||
\frac{E}{NkT} &= \frac{3}{2} + \frac{3}{2} + | ||
\sum_{j=1}^{3n-6}{\left(\frac{\Theta_{\nuj}}{2T} + | ||
\frac{\Theta_{\nuj}/T}{e^{\Theta_{\nuj}/T} - 1}\right)}- | ||
\frac{D_e}{kT}\\ | ||
\frac{C_v}{Nk} &= \frac{3}{2} + \frac{3}{2} + | ||
\sum_{j=1}^{3n-6}{\left({\left(\frac{\Theta_{\nuj}}{T}\right)} + | ||
\frac{e^{\Theta_{\nuj}/T}}{e^{\Theta_{\nuj}/T} - 1}\right)}\\ | ||
\frac{S}{Nk} &= \ln{\left[\frac{2\pi MkT}{h^{2}}\right]}^{3/2} | ||
\frac{Ve^{5/2}}{N} + \ln{\left[\frac{\pi^{1/2} e^{3/2}}{\sigma} | ||
{\left(\frac{T^3}{\Theta_A \Theta_B \Theta_{C}}\right)}^{1/2}\right]} | ||
+ | ||
\end{align*} |
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters