Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(cognitarium): move query messages into dedicated AST file #681

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Dec 17, 2024

Let’s move the types used to query the cognitarium into a dedicated ast file. Their structure already hints at an AST-like representation of the query grammar. This sets the stage for what’s coming next… Stay tuned. 👀

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new parser module to enhance parsing capabilities.
    • Added comprehensive data structures for RDF query components in the new ast module.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the submit_claims function.
  • Refactor

    • Reorganized imports across various modules to source types from the new parser module instead of the msg module, enhancing code clarity and maintainability.
  • Documentation

    • Added documentation comments for clarity on various structs and enums.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a significant architectural refactoring of the Axone Cognitarium project, focusing on modularizing query-related types and structures. The primary change involves creating a new parser module to centralize type definitions previously located in the msg module. This restructuring aims to improve code organization by separating message definitions from parsing-related types, enhancing the overall maintainability and clarity of the codebase.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/lib.rs Added new public parser module
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/msg.rs Removed multiple enum and struct definitions related to query handling
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/ast.rs Created new file with comprehensive query language data structures
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/mod.rs Established module with public re-export of ast contents
Multiple querier and RDF mapper files Updated import statements from msg to parser module
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs Refined claim submission logic and import statements

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant MSGModule as Old msg Module
    participant ParserModule as New parser Module
    
    Developer->>MSGModule: Previously defined types
    MSGModule->>Developer: Tight coupling, less flexibility
    
    Developer->>ParserModule: Restructure types
    ParserModule-->>Developer: More modular, clear separation of concerns
    
    Note over Developer,ParserModule: Improved code organization and maintainability
Loading

The sequence diagram illustrates the transition from a monolithic message module to a more structured parser module, highlighting the architectural improvement in type management and code organization.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Dec 17, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_objectarium.wasm 458.07 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_law_stone.wasm 593.03 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_cognitarium.wasm 882.05 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_dataverse.wasm 697.14 KB (0%)

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2024 09:46
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (1)

Line range hint 48-50: Security concern: Accepting unverified credentials without proper verification

Accepting unverified credentials when the issuer matches the sender can introduce security vulnerabilities. Relying solely on the transaction's signature may allow malicious actors to submit fraudulent credentials without proper validation. It is recommended to enforce full credential verification even when the issuer matches the sender to ensure the integrity of the data.

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1)

Line range hint 8-41: Consider enhancing error handling and documentation.

While the code is well-structured, consider these improvements:

  1. Replace generic StdResult with custom error types for more specific error handling
  2. Add documentation comments explaining the purpose and behavior of each function

Example implementation:

/// Custom error type for mapping operations
#[derive(Debug, thiserror::Error)]
pub enum MapperError {
    #[error("Failed to resolve namespace: {0}")]
    NamespaceResolution(String),
    #[error("Invalid IRI format: {0}")]
    InvalidIRI(String),
}

/// Converts a Literal to an Object, resolving any typed values using the provided namespace solver
/// 
/// # Arguments
/// * `ns_solver` - Namespace resolver implementation
/// * `prefixes` - Map of prefix to namespace mappings
/// * `literal` - The literal value to convert
/// 
/// # Returns
/// * `Result<Object, MapperError>` - The converted object or an error
pub fn literal_as_object(
    ns_solver: &mut dyn NamespaceSolver,
    prefixes: &HashMap<String, String>,
    literal: Literal,
) -> Result<Object, MapperError> {
    // ... existing implementation ...
}
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (2)

Line range hint 888-1084: Consider improving test maintainability

The test cases contain repetitive template construction code. Consider introducing helper functions to reduce duplication and improve maintainability.

Example refactor:

fn create_delete_template(subject: &str, predicate: &str, object: &str) -> parser::TripleDeleteTemplate {
    parser::TripleDeleteTemplate {
        subject: VarOrNamedNode::NamedNode(Full(subject.to_string())),
        predicate: VarOrNamedNode::NamedNode(Full(predicate.to_string())),
        object: VarOrNamedNodeOrLiteral::NamedNode(Full(object.to_string())),
    }
}

// Usage in tests
let template = create_delete_template(
    "https://ontology.axone.space/dataverse/dataspace/metadata/unknown",
    "https://ontology.axone.space/core/hasTopic",
    "https://ontology.axone.space/thesaurus/topic/Test"
);

Line range hint 2285-2340: Enhance code clarity in construct templates

While the functionality is correct, consider these improvements for better readability:

  1. Use more descriptive variable names (e.g., temporal_coverage instead of tcov)
  2. Consider breaking down long template definitions into smaller, well-named components

Example refactor:

// Define template components with descriptive names
let temporal_coverage_template = parser::TripleConstructTemplate {
    subject: VarOrNode::Node(BlankNode("metadata".to_string())),
    predicate: VarOrNamedNode::NamedNode(Full(
        "https://my-ns/predicate/temporal-coverage".to_string(),
    )),
    object: VarOrNodeOrLiteral::Variable("temporal_coverage".to_string()),
};

// Use components in test cases
let templates = vec![
    temporal_coverage_template,
    information_template,
    // ... other templates
];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4ace56 and 3656a03.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (14 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/msg.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/ast.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/expression.rs (4 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (6 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs (2 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/registrar/registry.rs (1 hunks)
  • packages/axone-cognitarium-client/src/client.rs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs
  • contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/mod.rs
  • packages/axone-cognitarium-client/src/client.rs
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (11)
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/lib.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-dataverse/src/registrar/registry.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/expression.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/msg.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/ast.rs (1)

Pattern **/*.rs: Review the Rust code, point out issues relative to principles of clean code, expressiveness, and performance.
Suggest idiomatic solutions and best practices.

🔇 Additional comments (20)
contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1)

1-1: LGTM! The import change aligns with the architectural refactoring.

The modification to import Literal and IRI from parser instead of msg reflects a cleaner separation of concerns, moving parsing-related types to a dedicated module.

Let's verify the consistency of this change across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Import changes are consistent across the codebase

The verification confirms that:

  • No remaining imports of Literal or IRI from the msg module exist
  • All imports of these types now consistently use the parser module across four files:
    • contract.rs
    • variable.rs
    • plan_builder.rs
    • mapper.rs
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all imports of Literal and IRI are now from the parser module

# Check for any remaining imports from msg module
echo "Checking for any remaining imports from msg module..."
rg "use crate::msg::(.*)(Literal|IRI)" -g "*.rs"

# Verify new imports are consistent
echo "Verifying new imports from parser module..."
rg "use crate::parser::(.*)(Literal|IRI)" -g "*.rs"

Length of output: 687

contracts/axone-dataverse/src/registrar/registry.rs (1)

4-7: LGTM! Clean import restructuring.

The changes align well with the PR's objective of moving query-related types to a dedicated AST file. The imports are properly organized and maintain a clear separation of concerns.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs (5)

7-20: LGTM! Clean implementation of Subject mapping.

The implementation correctly handles all node types and maintains proper error handling.


23-33: LGTM! Property mapping implementation is correct.

The implementation properly handles both full and prefixed IRIs with appropriate error handling.


36-49: LGTM! Value mapping from Node is well-implemented.

The implementation maintains proper handling of all node types and error cases.


Line range hint 52-74: LGTM! Value mapping from Literal is comprehensive.

The implementation correctly handles all literal variants with proper error handling.


Line range hint 86-94: LGTM! PrefixMap implementation is clean.

The implementation maintains a clear and efficient conversion from prefix list to map.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/expression.rs (3)

107-109: LGTM! Term methods are well-implemented.

The from_iri and from_literal methods properly handle all cases with appropriate error handling. The test coverage is comprehensive and validates the behavior thoroughly.

Also applies to: 112-123


390-398: LGTM! IRI test cases are comprehensive.

The test cases cover all important scenarios including successful conversions and error cases.


415-437: LGTM! Literal test cases are thorough.

The test cases provide good coverage of all literal variants and error scenarios.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/msg.rs (1)

1-3: Imports updated to reflect module refactoring

The import statements correctly reference types from crate::parser, aligning with the reorganization of query-related types.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/lib.rs (1)

4-4: Addition of parser module enhances modularity

Introducing the parser module improves code organization by separating parsing functionalities from message definitions.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (6)

1-4: Imports adjusted for module restructuring

The import statements now correctly source types from crate::parser, ensuring consistency with the refactored codebase.


121-162: Function build_expression correctly utilizes parser::Expression

The build_expression function has been appropriately updated to pattern-match on parser::Expression variants, maintaining functionality after the refactoring.


288-288: Test module imports updated appropriately

The test module now imports Literal, Node, Prefix, and IRI from crate::parser, ensuring that tests align with the updated module structure.


671-754: Test cases updated to use new parser::Expression variants

The test cases have been adjusted to utilize parser::Expression variants, ensuring they effectively test the refactored build_expression function.


915-915: Filter expression correctly handles bound variables

In the build_plan test case, the filter expression uses variable "1", which is bound in the inner WhereClause. This ensures proper evaluation during query execution.


943-943: ⚠️ Potential issue

Unbound variable detected in filter expression

The filter expression uses variable "oups", which is not bound in the inner WhereClause. This will result in an error due to the unbound variable.

Please verify that all variables used in filter expressions are properly bound in the query plan to prevent runtime errors.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (1)

1-1: Imports updated to use types from crate::parser

The import statements have been adjusted to source query-related types from crate::parser, reflecting the modularization of parsing components.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (1)

56-57: LGTM: Clean import reorganization

The imports have been properly reorganized to use types from the dedicated parser module, which aligns with the PR's objective of better separating concerns.

contracts/axone-cognitarium/src/parser/ast.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Dec 17, 2024

@coderabbitai resolve

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 17, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Dec 17, 2024

The test coverage has decreased due to the calculation method, as some files were moved without their associated tests. However, the actual coverage remains unchanged.

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 1a08ef5 into main Dec 17, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the refactor/move-query-ast branch December 17, 2024 10:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants