-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement OutOfRangeTx variant of Invalid bundle fraud proof #2039
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
30c7052
first draft of tx out of range fraud proof generation and verification
ParthDesai cbbcd85
add runtime api to get the execution receipt from the hash
ParthDesai eedcedf
retrieve parent domain block hash from consensus state + verify inval…
ParthDesai 1e2792f
integrate invalid bundles proof verifier
ParthDesai 1e21141
remove todo for missing invalid fraud proof and return bad receipt hash
ParthDesai f9a265a
add block hash for ER + bundle and general bug fix for invalid bundle…
ParthDesai df8625a
add test for invalid bundle fraud proof + clippy fixes
ParthDesai 5f5f2b8
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:subspace/subspace into draft-tx-out…
ParthDesai 15ae886
Merge branch 'main' into draft-tx-out-of-range
ParthDesai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The fraud proof is targetting an invalid ER,
consensus_block_incl_bundle
should beER::consensus_block_hash
and why do we needconsensus_block_incl_er
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it is okay to use the best consensus hash to get the bad receipt, because the fraud proof is included in the next consensus block that builds on top of the best consensus block so the fraud proof should be verified against the best consensus block, if the bad receipt don't exist here which means the bad receipt is already pruned or is in other forks, in both cases the fraud proof should be considered as invalid.