Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Parallel block verification #2015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions Cargo.lock

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions crates/sc-consensus-subspace/Cargo.toml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ subspace-core-primitives = { version = "0.1.0", path = "../subspace-core-primiti
subspace-proof-of-space = { version = "0.1.0", path = "../subspace-proof-of-space" }
subspace-verification = { version = "0.1.0", path = "../subspace-verification" }
thiserror = "1.0.48"
tokio = { version = "1.32.0", features = ["sync"] }

[dev-dependencies]
# TODO: Restore in the future, currently tests are mostly broken and useless
Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion crates/sc-consensus-subspace/src/lib.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -694,7 +694,6 @@ where
}

// Check if farmer's plot is burned.
// TODO: Add to header and store in aux storage?
if self
.client
.runtime_api()
Expand Down
79 changes: 49 additions & 30 deletions crates/sc-consensus-subspace/src/verifier.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
//! Subspace block import implementation

use crate::{Error, SUBSPACE_FULL_POT_VERIFICATION_INTERMEDIATE};
use futures::lock::Mutex;
use futures::stream::FuturesUnordered;
use futures::StreamExt;
use log::{debug, info, trace, warn};
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -33,6 +34,10 @@ use subspace_core_primitives::crypto::kzg::Kzg;
use subspace_core_primitives::{BlockNumber, PublicKey, RewardSignature};
use subspace_proof_of_space::Table;
use subspace_verification::{check_reward_signature, verify_solution, VerifySolutionParams};
use tokio::sync::Semaphore;

/// This corresponds to default value of `--max-runtime-instances` in Substrate
const BLOCKS_LIST_CHECK_CONCURRENCY: usize = 8;
Copy link
Contributor

@vedhavyas vedhavyas Sep 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe MAX_CONCURRENT_BLOCK_VERIFICATIONS?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really, the verification is running at higher concurrency, this is just for block list check that requires runtime API calls and is bound by number of runtime instances.


/// Errors encountered by the Subspace verification task.
#[derive(Debug, Eq, PartialEq, thiserror::Error)]
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -131,6 +136,8 @@ where
sync_target_block_number: Arc<AtomicU32>,
is_authoring_blocks: bool,
pot_verifier: PotVerifier,
equivocation_mutex: Mutex<()>,
block_list_verification_semaphore: Semaphore,
_pos_table: PhantomData<PosTable>,
_block: PhantomData<Block>,
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -178,6 +185,8 @@ where
sync_target_block_number,
is_authoring_blocks,
pot_verifier,
equivocation_mutex: Mutex::default(),
block_list_verification_semaphore: Semaphore::new(BLOCKS_LIST_CHECK_CONCURRENCY),
_pos_table: Default::default(),
_block: Default::default(),
})
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -414,6 +423,10 @@ where
return Ok(());
}

// Equivocation verification uses `AuxStore` in a way that is not safe from concurrency,
// this lock ensures that we process one header at a time
let _guard = self.equivocation_mutex.lock().await;

// check if authorship of this header is an equivocation and return a proof if so.
let equivocation_proof =
match check_equivocation(&*self.client, slot_now, slot, header, author)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -475,6 +488,10 @@ where
SelectChain: sp_consensus::SelectChain<Block>,
SN: Fn() -> Slot + Send + Sync + 'static,
{
fn supports_stateless_verification(&self) -> bool {
true
}

async fn verify(
&self,
mut block: BlockImportParams<Block>,
Expand All @@ -500,37 +517,39 @@ where
>(&block.header)
.map_err(Error::<Block::Header>::from)?;

// Check if farmer's plot is burned.
// TODO: Add to header and store in aux storage?
if self
.client
.runtime_api()
.is_in_block_list(
*block.header.parent_hash(),
&subspace_digest_items.pre_digest.solution().public_key,
)
.or_else(|error| {
if block.state_action.skip_execution_checks() {
Ok(false)
} else {
Err(Error::<Block::Header>::RuntimeApi(error))
}
})?
// Check if farmer's plot is burned, ignore runtime API errors since this check will happen
nazar-pc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
// during block import anyway
{
warn!(
target: "subspace",
"Verifying block with solution provided by farmer in block list: {}",
subspace_digest_items.pre_digest.solution().public_key
);

return Err(Error::<Block::Header>::FarmerInBlockList(
subspace_digest_items
.pre_digest
.solution()
.public_key
.clone(),
)
.into());
// We need to limit number of threads to avoid running out of WASM instances
let _permit = self
.block_list_verification_semaphore
.acquire()
.await
.expect("Never closed; qed");
if self
.client
.runtime_api()
.is_in_block_list(
*block.header.parent_hash(),
&subspace_digest_items.pre_digest.solution().public_key,
)
.unwrap_or_default()
{
warn!(
target: "subspace",
"Verifying block with solution provided by farmer in block list: {}",
subspace_digest_items.pre_digest.solution().public_key
);

return Err(Error::<Block::Header>::FarmerInBlockList(
subspace_digest_items
.pre_digest
.solution()
.public_key
.clone(),
)
.into());
}
}

let slot_now = (self.slot_now)();
Expand Down
Loading