Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: message example issue in migration guide #3673

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VisualBean
Copy link
Contributor

@VisualBean VisualBean commented Feb 13, 2025

Found an issue in the migration guide surrounding messages. Specifically the example under channels.
Where its stated that message sat on the channel level (which they do not in V2)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Provided an updated migration guide detailing major updates for AsyncAPI v3.
    • Explained changes in metadata organization, server URL structure, channel configuration, and operation keywords.
    • Clarified updates in message definitions, explicit reference usage, trait precedence, schema linkage, optional channels, and parameters refinement.

message never sat on the channel level in v2.
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1a88655
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67adc222d856900008b41d05
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3673--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@VisualBean VisualBean changed the title fix issue in migration guide chore: issue in migration guide Feb 13, 2025
@VisualBean VisualBean changed the title chore: issue in migration guide chore: message example issue in migration guide Feb 13, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (69d74a6) to head (1a88655).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #3673   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           20        20           
  Lines          732       732           
=========================================
  Hits           732       732           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The migration guide for AsyncAPI v3 has been updated to document the breaking changes from v2. The update details a reorganization of metadata (now under the info object), a new breakdown of the server URL into host, pathname, and protocol, and significant modifications to channel, operation, and message definitions. Additional changes include explicit reference requirements, trait precedence, consolidated schema formats, optional channels, and a simplified parameters object. No modifications were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/.../migrating-to-v3.md Updated migration guide for AsyncAPI v3 covering: metadata relocation under info; server URL splitting; decoupling of operations, channels, and messages; renaming of operation keywords (send/receive); explicit references; trait precedence; consolidated schema formats; optional channels; and simplified parameters object.

Suggested labels

autoapproved, autoupdate

Suggested reviewers

  • quetzalliwrites
  • VaishnaviNandakumar
  • J0SAL
  • BhaswatiRoy
  • TRohit20

Poem

I'm a little rabbit with ears so spry,
Hopping through docs under a clear blue sky.
AsyncAPI’s guide now sings a brand new tune,
With changes that sparkle like a harvest moon.
Let every update fill your heart with glee,
For in these lines, fresh code hops free!


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
markdown/docs/migration/migrating-to-v3.md (1)

412-414: Consider adding migration guidance for complex parameter types.

While the simplification of parameters in v3 is well explained, it would be helpful to add guidance for users who need to migrate from v2's complex parameter types (objects, booleans) to v3's string-only approach.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69d74a6 and 1a88655.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • markdown/docs/migration/migrating-to-v3.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
markdown/docs/migration/migrating-to-v3.md (2)

150-162: Well-documented explanation of the publish/subscribe changes!

The explanation of the shift from publish/subscribe to send/receive is clear and comprehensive. The inclusion of references to further reading materials is particularly helpful for users who want to understand the reasoning behind this breaking change.


350-352: Excellent improvement in schema organization!

The consolidation of schema format with the schema itself in v3 is a significant improvement that enhances reusability. This change makes the relationship between schema and its format more explicit and maintainable.


asyncapi: 2.6.0
...
channels:
user/signedup:
message:
messageId: UserMessage
publish
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix syntax error in v2 example code.

The publish keyword is missing a colon in the v2 example.

Apply this diff to fix the syntax:

-    publish
+    publish:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
publish
publish:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant