-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add words about citation to affiliated package review #229
Conversation
Issues opened to request those coordinated packages add a CITATION file. EDIT: Links in Pey Lian's comment below. |
I cannot edit your post above, but this is an easier way to cross-ref issues across GitHub (also, the third URL was wrong): |
Re: guidelines on actually how to cite, we certainly should not set any strict rules, but some hints on what could get inside the
Needs of course some good balance of minimal info and making too lengthy prescriptions; also wondering if the details are better put into the guidelines (unless both are to be kept closely sync'ed). |
I added more words to the website. Check out astropy/astropy.github.com#460 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to go once astropy/astropy.github.com#460 is done!
Should we merge this as well to keep in sync with astropy/astropy.github.com#460? |
I vote yes but am not sure of who should push the button. @pllim ? |
Sure, though I see healpix and reproject are still lagging. I cannot merge here. |
I am happy with the discussion having started in both places. Merging. |
Adds one sentence to the Documentation section of the Affiliated Package review process. (I will also open an PR on the website to provide a link to some resources.)